Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide on the Determination of Sulfur Dioxide by Flue Gas Analyzer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reference materials of SO2, NO2 and CO were used to study the effects of different concentrations of NO2 and CO on the determination value of SO2 by flue gas analyzer with electrochemical sensors and UV differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS). Results showed that SO2 was affected more greatly by NO2 than CO using the method of electrochemical sensors. The electrolytic reaction of NO2 was the primary factor causing the lowerconcentration of SO2. SO2 with the concentration of 0–300 mg/m3 was affected greatly by NO2, and the determination value was unreliable. The determination error of SO2, with the concentration higher than 1500 mg/m3, was about 2%, and the test value was more accurate. The method of UV DOAS could improve the determination reliability of concentration of SO2 greatly when NO2 coexisted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Guo, Method for determination of sulfur dioxide in waste gas of stationary pollution source by constant potential electrolysis. Sci. Technol. Inf., 13 (2013) 70-71 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Shi and Q. Cao, The principle and application of handy SO2 emissions monitoring. Environ. Monit. China 15(5) (1999) 48-50 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Fang, Application and maintenance of electrochemical gas sensor in flue gas analyzer. Meas. Equip. Appl., 16(1) (2006) 30-31 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Yuan, K. Zou and L. Jin, Experiment on the determination accuracy of concentration of sulfur dioxide in flue gas by electrochemical sensor. Shandong Environ., 2 (2000) 25 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Zhang and X. Xie, Influence of carbon monoxide on the determination of sulfur dioxide by constant potential electrolysis method and countermeasure research. Environ. Monit. Manag. Technol., 26(2) (2014) 60-62 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Armitage and C. F. Cullis, Studies of the reaction between nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Combust. Flame, 16(2) (1971) 125-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. A. Betty, S. Choudhury and S. Arora, Tin oxide–polyaniline heterostructure sensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of toxic gases at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem., 220 (2015) 288-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Liu, Y. Wang, B. Wang, X. Yang, Q. Wang, X. Liang, P. Sun, X. Chuai, Y. Wang and G. Lu, Stabilized zirconia-based mixed potential type sensors utilizing MnNb2O6 sensing electrode for detection of low-concentration SO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 238 (2017) 1024-1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Punit, S. Anjali, T. Monika and G. Vinay, SnO2 thin film sensor having NiO catalyst for detection of SO2 gas with improved response characteristics. Sens. Actuators B Chem. (2017) (in press).

  10. H. Jiang and H. Zhao, Study on the accuracy of determination of sulfur dioxide in flue gas by methods of constant potential electrolysis. Liaoning Urban Rural Environ. Sci. Technol., 26(3) (2006) 35-36 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Carter, W. Johansen and C. Britton, Performance of a gas flow meter calibration system utilizing critical flow venturi standards. J. Metrol. Soc. India, 26 (2011) 247.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.-M. Su, W.-T. Lin and S. Masri, Establishment and verification of a primary low-pressure gas flow standard at NIMT. J. Metrol. Soc. India, 26 (2011) 173.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. J. Tsai and S. G. Aggarwal, Overview of the gas and aerosol metrology. J. Metrol. Soc. India, 28(3) (2013) 141-143.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. G. Watson, J. C. Chow, R. J. Tropp, X. Wang, S. D. Kohl and L. W. A. Chen, Standards and traceability for air quality measurements: flow rates and gaseous pollutants. J. Metrol. Soc. India 28(3) (2013) 167-179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Zhou, Study on real time monitoring method for smoke by UV Differential Absorption Spectroscopy. Tianjin University (2008) (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Xu and G. Xie, Portable infrared gas analyzer in the pollution sources discussion on sulfur dioxide monitoring. Guangdong Chem. Ind., 41(8) (2014) 145-146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gersen, M. van Essen, P. Visser, M. Ahmad, A. Mokhov, A. Sepman, R. Alberts, A. Douma and H. Levinsky, Detection of H2S, SO2 and NO2 in CO2 at pressures ranging from 1-40 bar by using broadband absorption spectroscopy in the UV/VIS range. Energy Procedia, 63 (2014) 2570-2582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sisi Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, B., Xu, S., Yu, Q. et al. Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide on the Determination of Sulfur Dioxide by Flue Gas Analyzer. MAPAN 32, 265–271 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-017-0223-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-017-0223-7

Keywords

Navigation