Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probability Health Risk Assessment and Measurement Uncertainty Estimation Related to Internal Exposure to Natural Radionuclides from Soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to develop methodology and to assess cancer mortality risks with assigned measurement uncertainty related to lifetime internal exposure to natural radionuclides 238U and 232Th from soil. Included exposure pathways were inhalation and direct ingestion of dust particles originating from soil. Total of 80 samples were collected at 23 locations that belong to meteorological stations under control of Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia. Activity concentration of radionuclides was measured using HPGe detector. Probability risk assessment and measurement uncertainty analysis was conducted using Monte Carlo method. For location with highest measured activity concentration, assessed cancer mortality risk for 238U is 0.185 × 10−6 with coverage interval of (0.0184–0.702) × 10−6 for ingestion exposure and 0.179 × 10−6 with coverage interval of (0.00514–1.33) × 10−6 for inhalation exposure. Mean value for assessed cancer mortality risk for 232Th is 0.582 × 10−6 with coverage interval of (0.0222–2.79) × 10−6 for ingestion exposure and 1.11 × 10−6 with coverage interval of (0.0319–8.27) × 10−6 for inhalation exposure. Coverage interval contains the value of assessed risk with the probability of 95 %. Assessed risks in this paper have low priority for further investigation because they are equal or lower than 10−6. Probability risk assessment introduces uncertainty analysis in convenient way and enables researches and decision-makers to improve quality of their results and decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the U.S. Population, EPA 402-R-11-001, EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, Washington, DC, (2011).

  2. B. Radosevic, J. Kovacevic and V. Jovic, Natural Occurring Uranium in Serbia and Possible Environmental Effect, J. Environ. Prot. Ecol., 3 (2002) 706–718.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Životić, I. Gržetić, H. Lorenz and V. Simić, U and Th in Some Brown Coals of Serbia and Montenegro and Their Environmental Impact, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 15(2) (2008) 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.B. Radenković, S.A. Cupać, J. D. Joksić and D. J. Todorović, Depleted Uranium Mobility and Fractionation in Contaminated Soil (Southern Serbia), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 15(1) (2008) 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Spasić-Jokić, L. Župunski, L. Janković and V. Gordanić, Effective Dose Estimation and Lifetime Cancer Mortality Risk Assessment from Exposure to Chernobyl 137Cs on the Territory of Belgrade City and the Region of Vojvodina, Serbia, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 18(5) (2011) 708–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.B. Tereesh, M.B. Radenkovic, J. Kovacevic and S.S. Miljanic, Terrestrial Radioactivity of the Jabal Eghei Area in Southern Libya and Assessment of the Associated Environmental Risks, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 153(4) (2013) 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Casas-Ruiz, R.A. Ligero and L. Barbero, Estimation of annual effective dose due to natural and man-made radionuclides in the metropolitan area of the bay of Cadiz (SW of Spain), Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 150(1) (2012) 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H.V. Papaefthymiou, M. Manousakas, A. Fouskas and G. Siavalas, Spatial and Vertical Distribution and Risk Assessment of Natural Radionuclides in Soils Surrounding the Lignite Fired Power Plants in Megalopolis Basin, Greece, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 156(1) (2013) 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Zupunski, V.S. Jokic and V. Gordanic, Natural Radionuclides Content in the River Sediment and Related Health Risk Assessment for the West Morava River Basin, Serbia, Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci., 9(3) (2014) 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, EPA/630/P-03/001F, EPA, Washington, DC, (2005).

  11. International agency for research on cancer (IARC), Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Ionizing Radiation Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides, Volume 78, IARC Press, Lyon, (2001) pp. 31–71.

  12. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, (2006) pp. 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.J. Pawel, R.W. Leggett, K.F. Eckerman and C.B. Nelson, Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides, An Uncertainty Analysis for Risk Coefficients Reported in Federal Guidance Report No. 13. ORNL/TM-2006/583, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, (2007).

  14. UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, Annex A, Dose assessment methodologies, United Nations, New York, (2000).

  15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Soil Screening Guidance for Radionuclides: Technical Background Document, Publication 9355.4-16, EPA, Washington, DC, (2000).

  16. S.J. Al-Kharouf, I.F. Al-Hamarneh and M. Dababneh, Natural Radioactivity, Dose Assessment and Uranium Uptake by Agricultural Crops at Khan Al-Zabeeb, Jordan, J. Environ. Radioact., 99 (2008) 1192–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B.J. Howard, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, D. Telleria, G. Proehl, S. Fesenko, R.A. Jeffree, T.L. Yankovich, J.E. Brown, K. Higley, M.P. Johansen, H. Mulye, H. Vandenhove, S. Gashchak, M.D. Wood, H. Takata, P. Andersson, P. Dale, J. Ryan, A. Bollhöfer, C. Doering, C.L. Barnett and C. Wells, The IAEA Handbook on Radionuclide Transfer to Wildlife, J. Environ. Radioact., 121 (2013) 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Kentel and M.M. Aral, Probabilistic-Fuzzy Risk Modeling, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 18 (2004) 324–338.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. V.S. Jokic, L. Zupunski, I. Zupunski, Measurement Uncertainty Estimation of Health Risk from Exposure to Natural Radionuclides in Soil, Measurement, 46 (2013) 2376–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Kentel and M.M. Aral, 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D Fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 19 (2005) 86–96.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Hammonds, F. Hoffman and S. Bartell, An Introductory Guide to Uncertainty Analysis in Environmental and Health Risk Assessment, ES/ER/TM-35/R1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Poulter, Monte Carlo Simulation in Environmental Risk Assessment—Science, Policy And Legal Issues. In: Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 1998. http://ipmall.info/risk/vol9/winter/poulter.pdf Accessed 20 January 2015.

  23. A. Mokhtari and H. Frey, Sensitivity Analysis of a Two-Dimensional Probabilistic Risk Assessment Model Using Analysis of Variance, Risk Anal., 25(6) (2005) 1511–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Helton, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 42 (1993) 327–367.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Lee, J.W. Chung, I.M. Choi, Comparison of KCRV and Its Uncertainty of CCM Key Comparisons by Monte Carlo Method, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 30(4) (2015) 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Yang, G. Li, B. Wu, J. Gong, J. Wang, M. Zhang, Efficient Methods for Evaluating Task-Specific Uncertainty in Laser-Tracking Measurement, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 30(2) (2015) 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. A. Kulkarni, B. B. Ahuja, Test Specific Uncertainty Analysis of Zirconia-Dolerite Ball Plate by Monte Carlo Simulation, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, (2015) doi 10.1007/s12647-015-0152-2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 1), Evaluation of Measurement Data—Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”—Ropagation of Distributions using a Monte Carlo Method. JCGM 101:2008, (2008). http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ Accessed 20 January 2015.

  29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides, Federal Guidance Report 13, EPA 402 –R-99 -001. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, (1999).

  30. D. Popović, V Spasić-Jokić, G Đurić, Chernobyl: More Than Accident?, FTN Press, Novi Sad, (2009) (in Serbian).

    Google Scholar 

  31. International Atomic Energy Agency, Quantifying Uncertainty in Nuclear Analytical Measurements, IAEA-TECDOC-1401, IAEA, Austria, (2004).

  32. L. Župunski, V. Spasić-Jokić, M. Trobok, V. Gordanić, Cancer risk Assessment After Exposure from Natural Radionuclides in Soil Using Monte Carlo Techniques, ESPR, 17(9) (2010) 1574–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Soil Screening Guidance for Radionuclides: User’s Guide, EPA/540-R-00-007, EPA, Washington, DC, (2000).

  34. H.C. Frey and S.R. Patil, Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods, Risk Anal., 22(3) (2002) 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D. Goossens, J. Gross and W. Spaan, Aeolian Dust Dynamics in Agricultural Land Areas in Lower Saxony, Germany, ESPL, 26 (2001) 701–720.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Goossens, M. Riksen, Wind Erosion and Dust Dynamics: Observations, Simulations, Modelling, ESW Publications, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 1), Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, JCGM 100:2008. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ Accessed 20 January 2015.

  38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, EPA/600/R-09/052F, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, (2011) pp. 320–409.

  39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental Guidance, Standard Default Exposure Assumptions, Interim Final Publication 9285.6-03. 25, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).

  40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III—Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment RAGS, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, (2001).

  41. P. K. LaGoy, Estimated Soil Ingestion Rates for Use in Risk Assessment, Risk Anal., 7(3) (1987) 355–359.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is a part of the projects “Physics and Chemistry with Ion Beams” [III45006] and “Joint research of measurements and effects of ionizing and UV radiation in medicine and environmental protection” [III43011]. The authors are sincerely grateful to Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia, for supporting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

    Vesna Spasic Jokic & Ljubica Zupunski

  2. Geoscience, Kosovska 18, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia

    Vojin Gordanic

Authors
  1. Vesna Spasic Jokic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ljubica Zupunski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vojin Gordanic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ljubica Zupunski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spasic Jokic, V., Zupunski, L. & Gordanic, V. Probability Health Risk Assessment and Measurement Uncertainty Estimation Related to Internal Exposure to Natural Radionuclides from Soil. MAPAN 31, 97–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-015-0161-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-015-0161-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation