Abstract
A set of Critical Flow Venturis (CFVs) were manufactured by Flow Systems and calibrated by NIST in Gaithersburg, MD. Subsequently these flow standards along with pressure and temperature standards have been integrated into a gas flow meter calibration (GFC) system. Performance data and an uncertainty analysis is discussed here in this paper. Calibration data on these CFV standards will be used to inter-compare the NIST and CEESI primary facilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Wright and A. Johnson, NIST Lowers Gas Flow Uncertainties to 0.025% or Less, Measure, www.ncsli.org, (2010).
E.W. Lemmon, — M.O. McLinden and M.L. Huber, Refprop 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties, NIST Standard Reference Database 23, Version 8.1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, (2007).
CEESI Document Number: MA-002, Uncertainty Analysis to Support NAVLAP Accreditation of a Calibration Service based on a Gravimetric System Operating Over the 0.1–10 lbm/min Mass Flowrate Range, (2009). Available via: www.ceesi.com
ISO — IEC Guide 99 International Vocabulary of Metrology — Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, Int’l Stands Organ (ISO), Geneva, Switz., (2007). Available via: www.bipm.org
ISO — IEC Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, Int’l Stands Organ (ISO), Geneva, Switz., (1995). Available via: www.bipm.org
G.E. Mattingly, Consultant’s Report: Uncertainty Analysis for a FSI Gas Flow Calibration (GFC) System Calibrating a Meter Under Test (MUT) using a Single “P” Nozzle and a Check Standard (CHK), Report Submitted to Flow Systems Inc, Berthoud, CO, (2010).
D.C. Montgomery and E.A. Peck, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd edit.. Wiley, New York, (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, M., Johansen, W. & Britton, C. Performance of a gas flow meter calibration system utilizing critical flow venturi standards. MAPAN 26, 247–254 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-011-0023-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-011-0023-4