Abstract
Although a growing body of research has examined the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among late adolescent, adult, and older adult populations, there is a dearth of research examining the properties among middle adolescents across countries and cultures. This study therefore examined the psychometric properties—reliability, validity, temporal stability, and gender invariance—of the SWLS among a sample of middle adolescent students attending English-medium schools in the collectivist cultural setting of India. McDonald’s omega coefficient indicated that the SWLS scores showed evidence of reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the factorial validity of the SWLS scores. Bivariate correlational analyses provided support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the SWLS scores. The results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the SWLS scores significantly and positively predicted engagement scores and overall school GPA, thereby demonstrating the predictive validity of the SWLS scores. The test–retest reliability coefficient demonstrated the temporal stability of the SWLS scores. The results of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis provided support for gender invariance in the SWLS scores. Taken together, the results show that the SWLS is a psychometrically sound measure appropriate for assessing subjective well-being among middle adolescents enrolled in English-medium schools in a collectivist culture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
Upon request authors are prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results.
References
Antaramian, S. (2017). The importance of very high life satisfaction for students’ academic success. Cogent Education, 4, 1307622. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1307622
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
DeShon, R. P. (2004). Measures are not invariant across groups without error variance homogeneity. Psychology Science, 46, 137–149.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology, 58, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y
Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J., & Delgadillo-Chase, D. (2017). If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9, 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090
Di Fabio, A., & Gori, A. (2016). Measuring adolescent life satisfaction: Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Italian adolescents and young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915621223
Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4
Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2
Furr, R. M. (2018). Psychometrics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0
Heffner, A. L., & Antaramian, S. P. (2016). The role of life satisfaction in predicting student engagement and achievement. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9665-1
Hofstede, G. (2019). Compare countries. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/.
Jiang, X., Lyons, M. D., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). An examination of the reciprocal relations between life satisfaction and social problem solving in early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.004
Jovanović, V. (2016). The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 3173–3180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5
Jovanović, V., Joshanloo, M., Đunda, D., & Bakhshi, A. (2017). Gender differences in the relationship between domain-specific and general life satisfaction: A study in Iran and Serbia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9461-z
Kern, M. L., Benson, L., Steinberg, E. A., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000201
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2018). Mplus (Version 8.2) [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Vol. 39. Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101–117). New York, NY: Springer.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent child. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 85–88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021326822957
Silva, A. D., Taveira, M. C., Marques, C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Satisfaction with Life Scale among adolescents and young adults in Portugal: Extending evidence of construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 120, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0587-9
Wu, C.-H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012
Zanon, C., Bardagi, M. P., Layous, K., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale to Brazilians: Evidences of measurement noninvariance across Brazil and US. Social Indicators Research, 119, 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0478-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to Participate
All study participants provided written informed consent before completing the study survey.
Consent for Publication
Consent to submit has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Areepattamannil, S., Bano, S. Psychometric Properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) Among Middle Adolescents in a Collectivist Cultural Setting. Psychol Stud 65, 497–503 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00578-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00578-4