Abstract
Until recently, personality disorder research in India has been a largely neglected area. A small body of epidemiological research reveals lower prevalence rates for personality disorders in India than seen globally. The present study aims to examine personality disorders within the lens of family of origin and values, thereby providing a culturally relevant framework to understand this heterogeneous and complex clinical condition. The participants were recruited over a 2-year time period and comprised of 20 adults with personality disorders who, using a matched case-control design, were compared with 20 participants from the community. A total of three focus groups were conducted to develop themes for an in-depth interview that highlighted four context specific themes relevant to personality disorders (mood states that impact the self, significant life experiences, impact of family of origin and procreation, and value organization). The study revealed several key findings. Like previous studies, borderline and avoidant personality disorders were more common. Interestingly, participants were brought to the clinical setting in their late twenties. Internalized emotional reactions were predominant. The family acted as both a source of stress, abuse and support, with ties being maintained with extended family such as grandparents, siblings and spouse. Dissonance between individual values and existing pluralistic Indian cultural belief system was experienced. The findings highlight the requirement for expanding on cultural models of personality disorders in South Asian settings and integrating them into mainstream psychosocial assessment and interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alnaes, R., & Torgersen, S. (1989). Personality and personality disorders among patients with major depression in combination with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 79(4), 363–369.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publication.
Avasthi, A. (2010). Preserve and strengthen family to promote mental health. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(2), 113–126.
Brijnath, B. (2012). Why does institutionalized care not appeal to Indian families? Legislative and social answers from urban India. Ageing & Society, 32(4), 697–717.
Census 2011: Data Highlights. 2011. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Data_Products/Data_Highlights/Data_Highlights_link/datahighlights_hh1_2_3.pdf.
Government of India (2011). Census of India: Provisional population totals. New Delhi: Author.
Gupta, S., & Mattoo, S. K. (2010). Personality disorders: Prevalence and demography at a psychiatric outpatient in North India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 58(2), 146–152.
Hyler, S. E. (1994). The Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Kapoor, S., Hughes, P. C., Baldwin, J. R., & Blue, J. (2003). The relationship of individualism–collectivism and self-construals to communication styles in India and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(6), 683–700.
Kleinman, A., & Benson, P. (2006). Anthropology in the clinic: The problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Medicine, 10(3), 1673–1676.
Lamb, S. (1997). The making and unmaking of persons: Notes on aging and gender in North India. Ethos, 25(3), 279–302.
Mascolo, M. F., Misra, G., & Rapisardi, C. (2004). Individual and relational conceptions of self in India and the United States. New directions for child and adolescent development 104, 9–26.
Masten A.S., & Garmezy N. (1985) Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–52). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Murthy, S. (2011). Mental health initiatives in India (1947–2010). National Medical Journal of India, 24(2), 98–107.
Pfohl, B., Conyell, W., Zimmerman, M., & Stangl, D. (1986). DSM-III personality disorders: Diagnostic overlap and internal consistency. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 27(1), 21–34.
Roland, A. (1988). In search of self in India and Japan. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to wellbeing: healthy values, value goal attainment, and environmental congruence. In A. Linsley & J. Stephen (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 68–85). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.
Sharan, P. (2012). An overview of Indian research in personality disorders. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(Suppl1), 250–254.
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (2001). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In A. Dalal & G. Mishra (Eds.), New directions in Indian psychology (pp. 241–256). New Delhi: Sage.
Sinha, J. B. P., & Verma, J. (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 123–129). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Sinha, J. B. P., Vohra, N., Singhal, S. R., Sinha, B. N., & Ushashree, S. (2002). Normative beliefs about collectivist–individualist intentions and behavior of Indians. International Journal of Psychology, 37(5), 309–319.
Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1378–1391.
Tandon, S. (2004). Perception of family functioning and coping in relation to personality clusters in young adults. Unpublished Dissertation, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Funding
The study is a hospital funded project and part of the doctoral work of the author conducted at National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narayanan, G., Rao, K. Personality Disorders in the Indian Culture: Reconsidering Self-Perceptions, Traditional Society and Values. Psychol Stud 63, 32–41 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0437-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-017-0437-3