Skip to main content
Log in

The Illusion-of-Transparency and Episodic Memory: Are People Egocentric or Do People Think that Lies are Easy to Detect?

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The illusion-of-transparency seems like an egocentric bias, in which people believe that their inner feelings, thoughts and perspectives are more apparent to others than they actually are. In Experiment 1, participants read out true and false episodic memories to an audience. Participants over-estimated the number of people who would think that they were the liar, and they overestimated how many would correctly identify the liar. Experiment 2 found that with lessened task demands, and by using a scale of doubt, participants distinguished lies from truthful statements (albeit with a degree of error). Over the two experiments, results indicated that people have some ability to distinguish lies from truth (in illusion-of-transparency tasks), although people often overestimate this ability, and participants sometimes think their own lies are easier to detect than is really the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., Lowenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: an experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischoff, B. (1975). Hindsight = foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgement and uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgements under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (pp. 335–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (1998). The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Savitsky, K. (1999). The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency: egocentric assessments of how we are seen by others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(6), 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (1993). How do we know our own minds? The illusions of 1st-person knowledge of intentionality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. A. (1999). The curse of expertise: the effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, B., Ginzel, L. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1995). States of affairs and states of mind: the effect of knowledge on beliefs. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 64, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z. (2005). Egocentrism over email: can we communicate as well as we think. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925–936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., Kuban, J., & Gordon, C. L. (2006). Intentions in teasing: when “just kidding” isn’t good enough. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 412–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P., Robinson, E. J., Isaacs, J. E., & Nye, R. M. (1996). Contamination in reasoning about false belief: an instance of realist bias in adults but not children. Cognition, 59, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 747–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, J., & Baron, J. (2003). “I know, you know”: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(12), 38–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, K., Elphy, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 44–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, K., & Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, L., Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (2003). The illusion of transparency in negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 19(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roshan Rai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rai, R., Mitchell, P. & Faelling, J. The Illusion-of-Transparency and Episodic Memory: Are People Egocentric or Do People Think that Lies are Easy to Detect?. Psychol Stud 57, 58–66 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0138-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0138-2

Keywords

Navigation