Skip to main content
Log in

Methylglyoxal-Induced Protection Response and Toxicity: Role of Glutathione Reductase and Thioredoxin Systems

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Neurotoxicity Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thioredoxin (Trx) and glyoxalase (Glo) systems have been suggested to be molecular targets of methylglyoxal (MGO). This highly reactive endogenous compound has been associated with the development of neurodegenerative pathologies and cell death. In the present study, the glutathione (GSH), Trx, and Glo systems were investigated to understand early events (0.5–3 h) that may determine cell fate. It is shown for the first time that MGO treatment induces an increase in glutathione reductase (GR) protein in hippocampal slices (1 h) and HT22 nerve cells (0.5 and 2.5 h). Thioredoxin interacting protein (Txnip), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), Glo1, and Glo2 were markedly increased (2- to 4-fold) in hippocampal slices and 1.2- to 1.3-fold in HT22 cells. This increase in protein levels in hippocampal slices was followed by a corresponding increase in GR, TrxR, and Glo1 activities, but not in HT22 cells. In these cells, GR and TrxR activities were decreased by MGO. This result is in agreement with the idea that MGO can affect the Trx/TrxR reducing system, and now we show that GR and Txnip can also be affected by MGO. Impairment in the GR or TrxR reducing capacity can impair peroxide removal by glutathione peroxidase and peroxiredoxin, as both peroxidases depend on reduced GSH and Trx, respectively. In this regard, inhibition of GR and TrxR by 2-AAPA or auranofin, respectively, potentiated MGO toxicity in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. Overall, MGO not only triggers a clear defense response in hippocampal slices and HT22 cells but also impairs the Trx/TrxR and GSH/GR reducing couples in HT22 cells. The increased MGO toxicity caused by inhibition of GR and TrxR with specific inhibitors, or their inhibition by MGO treatment, supports the notion that both reducing systems are relevant molecular targets of MGO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Brazilian funding agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; #462333/2014-0, #306204/2014-2) and a Thome Foundation grant to P. Maher. Luiz Felipe de Souza and Ariana Ern Schmitz were CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) Ph.D. fellows. Alcir L. Dafre is a CNPq productivity research fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alcir Luiz Dafre.

Ethics declarations

All experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines on animal care of the local Ethics Committee on the use of animals (CEUA/UFSC), which follows the NIH publication “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care.”

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitz, A.E., de Souza, L.F., dos Santos, B. et al. Methylglyoxal-Induced Protection Response and Toxicity: Role of Glutathione Reductase and Thioredoxin Systems. Neurotox Res 32, 340–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-017-9738-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-017-9738-5

Keywords

Navigation