Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) Ratio on Elasto-Mechanic-Radiation Shielding Hallmarks of Li2O⋅MgO⋅Al2O3⋅SiO2⋅TiO2⋅ZrO2 Glasses

  • Research
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The radiation, elastic-mechanic-characteristics of LMAS (Li2O-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2) glass systems influenced by the molar ratio [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) additions were investigated. Within the incoming photon energies: 0.015 to 15.0 MeV spanned in this study, both XCOM and Phy-X/PSD codes were utilized. The outcomes demonstrate that substituting P2O5 with Al2O3 at the expense of SiO2 led to an increase in glass density from 3.021 to 3.26 g/cm3, which, in turn, decreased the LAC from 2.633 to 2.534 cm−1 at E = 400 keV. The MAC values were found to be 6.721 < MAC < 7.004 g/cm2 at low photon energy.The uppermost values of MAC were observed for the glass-system encoded as 0P-5AF with a direct relationship to energy. The highest effective-atomic-number (Zeff) was recorded at E = 20 keV, and ranged from 18.13 to 19.31 for the LMAS samples. Subsequently, Zeff declined rapidly to a value around 9.75 at E = 1.0 MeV, and slightly increased above E = 1.50 MeV. Furthermore, the tenth-value-layer (TVL) values bare that an decrease of [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) mol% from 0.0 to 20.8% decreased the thickness required to stop or obstruct photons (e.g., 11.974 < TVL < 11.241 cm at E = 1.0 MeV). The 3P-5A sample exhibited the highest half-value-layer 0.033 < HVL < 10.666 cm, while the 2P-16A sample had the lowest HVL. The optimized ratio [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) was found to be 6.8.The radiation shield hallmarks of the LMAS glass blocks developed as the ratio [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) enhanced in the glass samples. The elastic moduli were found to depend on this ratio content molar concentration. Accordingly, the radiation shielding properties are also correlated in same manner. Also, the calculated elastic-mechanical intrinsic of these transparent blocks, include the molar volume (Vm), which increased from 18.157 to 19.92 cm3/mol, and the free-energy (G) from 71.895 to 83.313 kJ/cm3 were found to depend on the nominated mol%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in this article.

References

  1. McMillan PW (1964) Glass-ceramics. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pinckney LR, Beall GH (2008) Microstructural evolution in some silicate glass-ceramics: a review. J Am Ceram Soc 91:773–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ananthanarayanan A, Kothiyal G, Montagne L, Revel B (2010) MAS-NMR studies of lithium aluminum silicate (LAS) glasses and glass–ceramics having different Li2O/Al2O3 ratio. J Solid State Chem 183:120–127

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grussaute H, Montagne L, Palavit G, Bernard JL (2000) Phosphate speciation in Na2O–CaO–P2O5–SiO2 and Na2O–TiO2–P2O5–SiO2 glasses. J Non-Crystal Solids 312–317:263–264

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Luo Z, Liu T, Hao X, Li Z, Lu A (2014) MgO-doping in the Li2O–ZnO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramics for better sealing with steel. J Non-Crystal Solids 405:170–175

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shyu JJ, Lee HH (1995) Sintering, crystallization, and properties of B2O3/P2O5-doped Li2O–Al2O3–4SiO2 glass-ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 78:2161–2167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Y, Zhang Z, Liu L, Wang X (2015) FTIR, Raman and NMR investigation of CaO–SiO2–P2O5 and CaO–SiO2–TiO2–P2O5 glasses. J Non-Crystal Solids 420:26–33

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ariane K, Tamaya A, Chorfa A, Rubio F, Rubio J (2020) Kinetic study on the effect of adding P2O5 to the LMAS glass-ceramic Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio 59:239–250

  9. Ariane K, Tamayo A, Chorfa A, Rubio F, Rubio J (2022) Effect of P2O5 and Al2O3 on crystallization, structure, microstructure and properties of Li2O–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–TiO2–ZrO2 glass ceramics. Boletín de la Sociedad Espan˜ ola de Cerámica y Vidrio 62:146-159

  10. Khattari ZY (2022) Radiation shielding parameters of CuxP2O5+x copper phosphate compounds: a comparative study using Phys-X/PSD and Py-MLBUF software. J Aust Ceram Soc 57:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khattari Z, Al-Buriahi MS (2022) Monte Carlo simulations and Phy-X/PSD study of radiation shielding effectiveness and elastic properties of barium zinc aluminoborosilicate glasses. Radiat Phys Chem 195:110091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Al‑Omari S, Alsaif NAM, Khattari ZY, Hanan Al‑Ghamdi, A. M. Abdelghany, Rammah YS (2023) Physical, mechanical, neutron‑radiation shielding, and optical properties of ternary glasses at equimolar ratio of Na2O: P2O5 with distinct CuO contents. Appl Phys A 129:256

  13. Sallam OI, Madbouly AM, Elalaily NA, Ezz-Eldin FM (2020) Physical properties and radiation shielding parameters of bismuth borate glasses doped transition metals. J Alloy Compd 843:156056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sallam OI, Madbouly AM, Ezz-Eldin FM (2022) Impact of Nd3+ additive on the radiation shielding competence of borosilicate glasses fabricated from agro-waste materials. J Non-Cryst Solids 590:121691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Madbouly AM, Sallam OI, Issa SAM, Rashad M, Hamdy A, Tekin HO, Zakaly HMH (2022) Experimental and FLUKA evaluation on structure and optical properties and γ-radiation shielding capacity of bismuth borophosphate glasses. Prog Nuclear Energy 148:104219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sallam OI, Issa SAM, Rashad M, Madbouly AM, Tekin HO, Badawi A, Hamdy A, Zakaly HMH (2022) Impact of molybdenum on optical, structure properties and gamma radiation shielding parameters of borophosphate glass: Intensive experiment investigations. Radiat Phys Chem 198:110140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasmin S, Barua BS, Khandaker MU, Chowdhury F-U-Z, Rashid Md. A, Bradley DA, Olatunji MA, Kamal M (2018) Studies of ionizing radiation shielding effectiveness of silicabased commercial glasses used in Bangladeshi dwellings. Results Phys 9:541–549

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wagh A, Sayyed MI, Askin A, Özpolat ÖF, Sakar E, Lakshminarayana G, Kamath SD (2019) Influence of RE oxides (Eu3+, Sm3+, Nd3+) on gamma radiation shielding properties of lead fluoroborate glasses. Solid State Sci 96:105959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alsaif NAM, Khattari ZY, Abouhaswa AS et al (2022) Linear/nonlinear optical, elastic-mechanical properties, and radiation buildup factors of boro-bariofluoride glasses. Appl Phys A 128:1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-06157-w

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirdsiri K, Kaewkhao J, Chanthima N, Limsuwan P (2011) Comparative study of silicate glasses containing Bi2O3, PbO and BaO: Radiation shielding and optical properties. Ann Nucl Energy 38:1438–1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Taher A, Ali AM, Saddeek YB, Elsaman R, Algarni H, Shaaban KhS, Amer TZ (2019) Gamma ray shielding and structural properties of iron alkali aluminophosphate glasses modified by PbO. Radiat Phys Chem 165:108403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Omari S, Alsaif NAM, Khattari ZY et al (2023) Physical, mechanical, neutron-radiation shielding, and optical properties of ternary glasses at equimolar ratio of Na2O:P2O5 with distinct CuO contents. Appl Phys A 129:256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-06527-y

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuochi P, Corda U, Lavalle M, Kovacs A, Baranyai M, Mejri A, Karah K (2009) Dosimetric properties of gamma and electron-irradiated commercial window glasses. Nukleonika 54:39–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurudirek M, Chutithanapanon N, Laopaiboon R, Yenchai C, Bootjomchai C (2018) Effect of Bi2O3 on gamma ray shielding and structural properties of borosilicate glasses recycled from high pressure sodium lamp glass. J Alloy Compd 745:355–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alharbiy N, Khattari ZY, Rammah YS, Saleh A (2023) Role of Al2O3, WO3, Nb2O5, and PbO on the physical, elasto-mechanical and radiation attenuation performance of borotellurite glasses. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 34:191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bootjomchai C, Laopaiboon R (2014) Thermoluminescence dosimetric properties and effective atomic numbers of window glass. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res B 323:42–48

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaur P, Singh KJ, Thakur S, Singh P, Bajwa BS (2019) Investigation of bismuth borate glass system modified with barium for structural and gamma-ray shielding properties. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc 206:367–377

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Hadeethi Y, Tijani SA (2019) The use of lead-free transparent 50BaO-(50–x)borosilicate-xBi2O3 glass system as radiation shields in nuclear medicine. J Alloys and Compd 803:625–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Hashemite University for the generous support.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ziad Khattari: Conceptualization, review & editing, writing manuscript first draft;

Feras Afaneh: Assisted in writing the manuscript first draft;

Saleh Al-Omari: rearranging the manuscript and resources and wrote the reply to reviewers;

Ragab Elsad: Software and data analysis;

Yasser Rammah: supervision and finalized the last version of the manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Y. Khattari.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before, and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 161 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Omari, S., Afaneh, F., Elsad, R.A. et al. Optimizing [SiO2]/([P2O5] + [Al2O3]) Ratio on Elasto-Mechanic-Radiation Shielding Hallmarks of Li2O⋅MgO⋅Al2O3⋅SiO2⋅TiO2⋅ZrO2 Glasses. Silicon 16, 1005–1013 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02729-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02729-4

Keywords

Navigation