Skip to main content
Log in

An Overview of Pumice Stone as a Cementitious Material – the Best Manual for Civil Engineer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pumice stone is a natural sponge-like lightweight aggregate formed during the rapid cooling and solidification of molten lava. After suitable preparation, it can be used as an aggregate to produce lightweight concrete or as a cementitious material to produce blended cement or geopolymer. This article focused on the influence of pumice powder (PP) on fresh properties and hardened properties of conventional cementitious materials and geopolymers. Additionally, different modification methods carried out to modify some properties of conventional cementitious materials containing PP have been included. This review showed that the incorporation of PP in the traditional cement matrix has some benefits such as increasing thermal and acoustic insulation, increasing fire resistance, increasing abrasion resistance, decreasing unit weight, decreasing hydration heat, decreasing drying shrinkage, decreasing autoclave expansion, increasing sulfate resistance, increasing seawater resistance, increasing acid resistance, increasing electrical resistivity, decreasing alkali silica reaction (ASR) expansion, decreasing porosity, water absorption and permeability. On the other hand, it has a negative effect on workability, mechanical strength and increasing carbonation rate. This review also confirmed that PP has a promising future in the field of alkali-activated and geopolymer materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osman G (2015) Characteristics of fired clay bricks with pumice additive. Energy and Buildings 102:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grasser Klaus and Minke Gernot, "Building with pumice", A Publication of Deutsches Zentrum für Entwicklungstechnologien-GATE, In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, 1990, 1–64

  3. Clippinger DM, Gay WE (1947) Pumice aggregate in New Mexico its uses and potentialities. Publications of New Mexico Burean of Mines and Mineral Resources:1–56

  4. "Mineral commodity summaries 2019" Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, 1–200, https://doi.org/10.3133/70194932

  5. Rashad AM (2019) A short manual on natural pumice as a lightweight aggregate. Journal of Building Engineering 25(100802):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vivian J, Kaina M, Upenyu G (2017) Removal of Pb(II) and cd(II) from aqueous solution using alkaline-modified pumice stone powder (PSP): equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Turk J Chem 41:748–759

    Google Scholar 

  7. İzlen ÇD, Süreyya M (2015) A review on pumice for water and wastewater treatment. Desalin Water Treat:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1124348

  8. Fariborz H, Mohammad D (2019) Emamzadeh Seyed Shahab, "rheological properties, compressive strength and life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete containing natural pumice pozzolan". Constr Build Mater 206:122–129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramasamy Uma, Bordelon Amanda C. and Tikalsky Paul J., "Properties of different pumice grades blended with cement", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 29, 7, 2017, 04017040–1–04017040-7

  10. Khotbehasara Mojdeh Mehrinejad, Mohseni Ehsan, Ozbakkaloglu Togay and Ranjbar Malek Mohammad, "Durability characteristics of self-compacting concrete incorporating pumice and metakaolin", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 29, 11, 2017, 04017218–1–14017218-9

  11. Kianoosh S (2018) Kamali-Bernard Siham and Maghsoudi Ali Akbar, "durability of self-compacting concrete containing pumice and zeolite against acid attack, carbonation and marine environment". Constr Build Mater 165:247–263

    Google Scholar 

  12. Okan K, Hossain Khandaker MA, Atis Cengiz D, Mohamed L, Erdogan O (2017) ground Granulated pumice-based cement mortars exposed to abrasion and fire. Arab J Sci Eng 42:1321–1326

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nihat K, Mansur T (2015) Kizilkanat Ahmet B. and Oktay Didem, "properties of concrete with pumice powder and fly ash as cement replacement". Constr Build Mater 85:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hossain KMA, Lachemi M (2006) Performance of volcanic ash and pumice based blended cement concrete in mixed sulfate environment. Cem Concr Res 36:1123–1133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hossain KMA, Ahmed S, Lachemi M (2011) Lightweight concrete incorporating pumice based blended cement and aggregate: mechanical and durability characteristics. Constr Build Mater 25:1186–1195

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fatih Ö, Emin KM (2018) Influence of ground pumice on compressive strength and air content of both non-air and air entrained concrete in fresh and hardened state. Construction and Building Materials 187:382–393

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA, Yusuf MO (2019) Strength and transport characteristics of volcanic pumice powder based high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 216:314–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kizilkanat Ahmet B., Oktay Didem, Kabay Nihat and Tufekci M. Mansur, "Comparative experimental study of mortars incorporating pumice powder or fly ash", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 28, 2, 2016, 04015119–1–04015119-7

  19. Hossain KM (2006) Anwer, "macro-and microstructural investigation on strength and durability of pumice concrete at high temperature". J Mater Civ Eng 18(4):527–536

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mboya HA, Njau KN, Mrema AL, King’ondu CK (2019) Influence of scoria and pumice on key performance indicators of Portland cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 197:444–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murat K (2016) Gül Muhammed said, Gül Rüstem, Aydin Abdulkadir Cüneyt and Kotan Türkay, "the effect of pumice powder on the self-compactability of pumice aggregate lightweight concrete". Constr Build Mater 103:36–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bani AR, Alireza J, Douglas HR (2017) Workability retention and compressive strength of self-compacting concrete incorporating pumice powder and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials 134:116–122

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hossain KM (2004) Anwar, "properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete". Cem Concr Res 34:283–291

    Google Scholar 

  24. Abdullah ANT (2015) Assessment of pumice and scoria deposits in Dhamar-Rada' volcanic field SW- Yemen, as a pozzolanic materials and lightweight aggregates. IJISET, International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology 2(9):386–402

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hyati U (2016) Aruntas Huseyin Yilmaz and Gencel Osama, "investigation on characteristics of blended cements containing pumice". Constr Build Mater 118:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hossain KMA (2004) Development of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete. Mag Concr Res 56(2):99–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mücip T, Tolga D, Ali Ö, Tuğba E, Vural O (2013) Effect of physical, chemical and electro-kinetic properties of pumice on strength development of pumice blended cements. Mater Struct 46:1695–1706

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oĝuzhan K, Bahar D (2010) Corrosion behavior of reinforcing steel embedded in concrete produced with finely ground pumice and silica fume. Constr Build Mater 24:1898–1905

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alaettin K, Zeynep S (2015) Effect of heat treatment on pozzolanic activity of volcanic pumice used as cementitious material. Cement & Concrete Composites 57:128–132

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mustafa S (2013) Effect of silica fume and ground pumice on compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 49:484–489

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mehmet K, Ahmet B, Abdurrahman E (2017) Influence of ground pumice powder on the mechanical properties and durability of self-compacting mortars. Constr Build Mater 150:467–479

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fabio GM (2015) Pumice powder as filler of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials 96:581–590

    Google Scholar 

  33. El-Gamal Safaa MA, Hashem FS (2016) Enhancing the thermal resistance and mechanical properties of hardened Portland cement pastes by using pumice and Al2O3. J Therm Anal Calorim 128:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5863-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanifi B, Orhan A (2006) Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cement. Cement & Concrete Composites 28:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hanifi B, Selim K, Joselito A, Hasan K (2012) The sulphate resistance of cements containing red brick dust ground basaltic pumice with sub-microscopic evidence of intra-pore gypsum and ettringite as strengtheners. Cement & Concrete Composites 34:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oseni O, Audu M (2016) Comparative and flexural behavior of pozzolan from pumice-cement mortar. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 28(3):382–393

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sammiya S, Rachel C, Ferron Raissa D, Juenger Maria CG (2017) The role of particle size on the performance of pumice as a supplementary cementitious material. Cement and Concrete Composites 80:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  38. Anwar HKM (2004) Potential use of volcanic pumice as a construction material 16(6):573–577

  39. Hossain KM (2005) Anwar, "volcanic ash and pumice as cement additives: pozzolanic, alkali-silica reaction and autoclave expansion characteristics". Cement & Concrete composites 35:1141–1144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pantea R (2014) Ramezanianpour Ali Akbar and Mahdikhani Mahdi, "experimental investigation on flexural toughness of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HFRC) containing metakaolin and pumice". Constr Build Mater 51:313–320

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ehsan G, Dimitri F, Kamal K (2016) Feasibility of using natural SCMs in concrete for infrastructure applications. Constr Build Mater 127:724–732

    Google Scholar 

  42. Saridemir M, Severcan MH, Ciflikli M, Celikten S, Ozcan F, Atis CD (2016) The influence of elevated temperature on strength and microstructure of high strength concrete containing ground pumice and metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 124:244–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rahmani H, Ramazanianpour AA (2008) Effect of binary cement replacement materials on sulfuric acid resistance of dense concretes. Mag Concr Res 60(2):145–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hossain KM (2008) Anwar, "pumice based blended cement concretes exposed to marine environment: effects of mix composition and curing conditions". Cement & Concrete composites 30:97–105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mahya A (2018) Aval Siavash Fakhretaha and Joshaghani Alireza, "a comprehensive experimental study on the performance of pumice powder in self-compacting concrete (SCC)". Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials 7(6):340–356

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hesam M (2018) Norouzifar Mohammad Naser and Rostami Jamshid, "the synergistic effect of pumice and silica fume on the durability and mechanical characteristics of eco-friendly concrete". Constr Build Mater 174:356–368

    Google Scholar 

  47. Seyda C, Dilek K, Habip D (2015) Investigation of pumice stone powder coating of multilayer surfaces in relation to acoustic and thermal insulation. J Ind Text 44(4):639–661

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kianoosh S, Siham K-B, Akbar MA, Mohammad M, Hocine S (2017) Influence of pumice and zeolite on compressive strength, transport properties and resistance to chloride penetration of high strength self-compacting concretes. Construction and Building Materials 151:292–311

    Google Scholar 

  49. Reza BA, Hamed Z (2012) Comparison of rapid tests for evaluation of chloride resistance of concretes with supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 24(9):1177–1182

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hossain KMA (2006) Performance of volcanic ash and pumice-based blended cements in sulphate and sulphate-chloride environments. Adv Cem Res 18(2):71–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hanifi B, Selim K, Tamer R, Mehmet K (2014) Resistance to thaumasite form of sulphate arrack of blended cement mortars. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 4(31):4356–4379

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hossain KM (2005) Anwar, "chloride induced corrosion of reinforcement in volcanic ash and pumice based blended cement". Cement & Concrete composites 27:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  53. El Din SH, Rashad Alaa M, Tarek E (2011) Effect of elevated temperature on physico-mechanical properties of blended cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials 25:1009–1017

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rashad AM (2015) An investigation on very high volume slag pastes subjected to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 74:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rashad AM, Sadek DM (2017) An investigation on Portland cement replaced by high-volume GGBS pastes modified with micro-sized metakaolin subjected to elevated temperatures. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6(91):91–101

    Google Scholar 

  56. Süleyman GH, Serdar K, Osman Ş (2013) Reduction of alkali-silica reaction expansion of mortars by utilization of pozzolans. Magazine of Concrete Research 65(7):441–447

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hossain KMA (2005) Correlations between porosity, chloride diffusivity and electrical resistivity in volcanic pumice-based blended cement pastes. Adv Cem Res 17(1):29–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Elie K, Chiara P, Chayanee T, Rosa T, Duangrudee C (2016) Sglavo Vincenzo M., Thavorniti Parjaree and Leonelli Cristina, "self-compacting geopolymer concrete: effects of addition of aluminosilicate-rich fines", building. Engineering 5:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mohabbi YM, Ahmet B, Ramazan D (2015) The effects of silica modulus and aging on compressive strength of pumice-based geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials 94:767–774

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yadollahi MM, Benli A, Demirboğa R (2015) Effects of elevated temperatures on pumice based geopolymer composites. Plastics, Rubber and Composites 44(6):226–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ali A (2008) Mehrpour Kamyar and Kani Ebrahim Najafi, "investigating the possibility of utilizing pumice-type natural pozzonal in production of geopolymer cement". Ceramics-Silikáty 52(1):16–23

    Google Scholar 

  62. Çetinkaya S, Kurt H, Kütük N (2017) Lightweight geopolymer made of pumice with various aluminum powder ratios. Acta Phys Pol A 132(3):544–545

    Google Scholar 

  63. Almalkawi AT (2017) Hamadna Sameer and Soroushian Parviz, "one-part alkali activated cement based volcanic pumice". Constr Build Mater 152:367–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kürșat Y, Onur UL (2009) The effect of mineral admixture type on the modulus of elasticity of high strength concrete. Scientific Research and Essay 8:791–798

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kaffayatullah K, Nasir AM, Umair SM, Jahangir QH, Adel A-FM, Ghulam QM (2010) Effect of fineness of basaltic volcanic ash on pozzolanic reactivity, ASR expansion and drying shrinkage of blended cement mortars. Materials 12(2603):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rashad MM, Károly M (2016) Geoheritage of volcanic harrats in Saudi Arabia. Springer, pp 1–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33015-0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alaa M. Rashad.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashad, A.M. An Overview of Pumice Stone as a Cementitious Material – the Best Manual for Civil Engineer. Silicon 13, 551–572 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00469-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00469-3

Keywords

Navigation