Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative Endocrine Therapy: Preferred Therapy for Whom?

  • Systemic Therapy (J O'Shaughnessy, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Breast Cancer Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is safe and can be effective in many postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. There are limited data available for premenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors in combination with estrogen suppression. Letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane have all been shown to be equivalent or superior to tamoxifen in relatively small neoadjuvant trials in postmenopausal women. Tumor factors that appear to have good response are estrogen receptor positivity, characteristics consistent with the so-called Luminal A subtype and lobular carcinomas. Response to neoadjuvant treatment may inform decision making regarding adjuvant treatment, which should include radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery, or mastectomy, made feasible by neoadjuvant treatment to maintain low local recurrence rates. Chemotherapy may also be required in some cases based on the biological characteristics of the residual tumor and the extent of residual disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of Importance •• Of Major Importance

  1. Dixon JMJ, Renshaw L, Keys J, Leeper AD, Williams L, Evans DB. Outcome of Frail Elderly Patients Treated with Letrozole Alone. Cancer Res 2010; 70(24 Suppl): Abstract P1-12-06.

  2. Nagaraj G, Pacheco J, Ellis MJ, Margenthaler JA, Ma CX. Management of premenopausal women with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A single institution experience. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(suppl): abstr e11014.

  3. Torrisi R, Bagnardi V, Pruneri G, et al. Antitumour and biological effects of letrozole and GnRH analogue as primary therapy in premenopausal women with ER and PgR positive locally advanced operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:802–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Stoeger H, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: 62-month follow-up from the ABCSG-12 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):631–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeiler G, Königsberg R, Fesl C, et al. Impact of body mass index on the efficacy of endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with breast cancer: An analysis of the prospective ABCSG-12 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2653–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geisler J, Haynes B, Anker G, et al. Influence of letrozole and anastrozole on total body aromatization and plasma estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients evaluated in a randomized, cross-over study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:751–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Young O, et al. Letrozole suppresses plasma estradiol and estrone sulphate more completely than anastrozole in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1671–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gazet JC, Ford HT, Coombes RC, et al. Prospective randomized trial of tamoxifen vs surgery in elderly patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1994;20(3):207–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenny FS, Robertson JFR, Ellis IO, et al. Long-term follow-up of elderly patients randomised to primary tamoxifen or wedge mastectomy as initial therapy for operable breast cancer. Breast. 1998;7:335–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fentiman IS, Christiaens MR, Paridaens R, et al. Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial EORTC 10851 comparing tamoxifen alone with modified radical mastectomy. Eur J Ca. 2003;39(3):309–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mustacchi G, Ceccherini R, Milani S, et al. Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(3):414–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fennessy M, Bates T, MacRae K, Closed Trials Working Party of the Cancer Research UK Breast Cancer Trials Group. Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91(6):699–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bates T, Fennessy M, Riley DL, CRC Breast Cancer Trials Group UK. Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Surgery improves survival. The results of a Cancer Research Campaign Trial. Eur J Ca. 2001;37(5):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J, et al. Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1527–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, et al. Neoadjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer With Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Both in Combination: The Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined With Tamoxifen (IMPACT) Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;22(22):5108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, et al. Comparison of Anastrozole versus Tamoxifen as Preoperative Therapy in Postmenopausal Wmoen with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: The Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) Trial. Cancer. 2006;106(10):2095–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takei H, Suemasu K, Inoue K, Saito T, Okubo K, Koh J, Sato K, Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Tabei T. Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant exemestane for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, operable breast cancer: Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-03). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107(1):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. •• Seo JH, Kim YH, Kim JS. Meta-analysis of pre-operative aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal woman with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009; 63:261–266. This is a meta-analysis of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen neoadjuvant studies, demonstrating better results with aromatase inhibitors.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. • Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J et al. Randomized Phase II Neoadjuvant Comparison Between Letrozole, Anastrozole, and Exemestane for Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Rich Stage 2 to 3 Breast Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes and Predictive Value of the Baseline PAM50-Based Intrinsic Subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 2011 Jun 10; 29(17):2342–2349. These are the results of the first comparative study of aromatase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Freedman OC, et al. A randomized trial exploring the biomarker effects of neoadjuvant sequential treatment with exemestane and anastrozole in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(1):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. • Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Dixon J and Thomas JStJ. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Response to Neoadjuvant Letrozole Therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 130(3):871–877. This is the first study showing good responses to neoadjuvant letrozole in lobular cancers.

  22. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, et al. Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(18):3808–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huober J, von Minckwitz G, Denkert C, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124(1):133–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guarneri V, Broglio K, Kau SW, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov V, Dayshan GA, et al. Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Primary Endocrine Therapy Versus Chemotherapy in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer. 2007;110:244–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ring AE, Smith IE, Ashley S, Fulford LG, Lakhani SR. Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:2012–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Alba E, Calvo L, Albanell J, De la Haba J, Chacon J, Arcusa Lanza A, et al. Chemotherapy (CT) versus hormone therapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase II study (GEICAM/2006-03). J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(7s):abs 500.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dixon JM, Jackson J, Hills M, et al. Anastrozole demonstrates clinical and biological effectiveness in oestrogen-receptor-positive positive breast cancers, irrespective of the erbB2 status. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2742–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Young O, Murray J, Renshaw L, et al. Neoadjuvant letrozole is equally effective in HER2 positive and negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 88(1s): S36, abs 411.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Young O, et al. Estrogen-independent proliferation is present in estrogen-dependent HER2-positive primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant letrozole. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3019–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, et al. Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6253–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. •• Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer J.Natl.Cancer Inst 2007; 99 (2): 167–170. This study demonstrated a correlation between proliferation and prediction of response to neoadjuvant letrozole treatment.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Akashi-Tanaka S, Shimizu C, Ando M, et al. 21-Gene expression profile assay on core needle biopsies predicts responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2009;18(3):171–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller WR, Larionov A, Renshaw L, et al. Gene expression profiles differentiating between breast cancers clinically responsive or resistant to letrozole. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1382–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al. The Effect on Tumor Response of Adding Sequential Preoperative Docetaxel to Preoperative Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: Preliminary Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4165–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Toi M, et al. Ki67 index changes, pathological response and clinical benefits in primary breast cancer patients treated with 24 weeks of aromatase inhibition. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(4):858–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Horobin JM, Preece PE, Dewar JA, et al. Long-term follow-up of elderly patients with locoregional breast cancer treated with tamoxifen only. Br J Surg. 1991;78:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dixon JM. Neoadjuvant therapy: surgical perspectives. In: Miller WR, Ingle JN. Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. New York: Marcel Dekker: 2002: 197–212.

  40. •• Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Macaskill EJ et al. Increase in response rate by prolonged treatment with neoadjuvant letrozole. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 113: 145–151. This is the first study demonstrating improved response rate with prolonged neoadjuvant letrozole.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. • Carpenter R, Doughty JC, Wilson CR, et al. A multicentre study to determine the optimum duration of neoadjuvant letrozole on tumour regression to permit breast conserving surgery: updated analyses. J Clin Oncol 28:670, 2010 (suppl; abstr 670). This is a neoadjuvant study demonstrating prolonged response with continued treatment with neoadjuvant letrozole.

  42. Baselga J, Semiglazov V, van Dam P, et al. Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(16):2630–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Olson Jr JA, Budd GT, Carey LA, et al. Improved surgical outcomes for breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: results from a multicenter phase II trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:906–14 (discussion 915–6).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. • Thomas JS, Julian H, Green RV, Cameron DA and Dixon JM. Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring. Histopath 2007; 51: 219–226. First study to demonstrate the histopathological differences in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. van Nes JGH, Putter H, Julien JP, et al. Cooperating Investigators of the EORTC. Preoperative chemotherapy is safe in early breast cancer, even after 10 years of follow-up; clinical and translational results from the EORTC trial 10902. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115(1):101–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. • Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J, A’Hern R, Evans DB, Bhatnagar AS, et al. Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100(19):1380–1388. This paper describes the development of the PEPI scoring system.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schiff R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 331, 6S.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Osborne CK, Shou J, Massarweh, Schiff R. Crosstalk between estrogen receptor and growth factor receptor pathways as a cause for endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:865s–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;22:207–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Dixon JM, L Renshaw, J Keys, AD Leeper, L Williams, and DB. Evans. Factors Affecting Local Recurrence after Breast Conserving Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy with Letrozole. Cancer Res 2010; 70(24 Suppl): Abstract P1-12-05.

Download references

Disclosure

No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Michael Dixon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macaskill, E.J., Dixon, J.M. Preoperative Endocrine Therapy: Preferred Therapy for Whom?. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 4, 39–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-011-0060-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-011-0060-6

Keywords

Navigation