Abstract
Attempts have been made to identify the grand challenges (GC) in quite different disciplines including Computer Science. These major problems should be solved within one or two generations and the solution would have great societal and economic impact. GCs are to be distinguished from the improvement of methods where the basic problem has already been solved (“emerging fields”). Among other purposes, a common understanding of GCs within a community helps to focus efforts and resources and to create a climate of competition. With our study we try to gain an impression whether a certain consensus is within reach in Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE; Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI) in the German speaking area. We used a multi-staged opinion survey among scientists and practitioners of WI and could establish an order of precedence concerning the most important GCs. At the top ranks the item “Control of systemic risks in global networks”, followed by “Humanlike Information Systems in business context”, “Determining the influences on the degree of automation und integration”, “Influence of WI on the solution of semantic data processing problems”, and “Overcoming of communication barriers in inter-company integration”. We discuss drawbacks of the GC concept as well as attempts to improve the method. One main problem is to distinguish the terms “grand challenges” (GC), “emerging fields” (EF), and “new research goals” (NR).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battiston S, Puliga M, Kaushik R, Tasca P, Caldarelli G (2012) DebtRank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the federal and systemic risk. Sci Rep 541(2)
Berg M (2013) Natürlichsprachlichkeit in Dialogsystemen. Inform Spektrum 36(4):371–381
Chuberre N, Liolis K (2010) Contribution to grand societal challenges. European technology platform. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/isi_contribution.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2015
Dickersbach JT (2010) Grand challenges for discrete event logistics systems. Unpublished paper, Munich
Eder J (2009) Festrede: Grand Challenges der Informatik. In: Chroust G, Mössenböck H (eds) Informatik macht Zukunft, Zukunft macht Informatik. Festschrift, Wien, pp 33–42
Finsterbusch S (2013) Mister Innovation. FAZ 19 July 2013, p 20
Gadatsch A, Vaziri DD (2013) Barrierefreie Informationssysteme. Das Wirtschaftsstudium 42(8/9):1094–1100
Hilbert D (1901/02) Mathematical problems. Bull Am Math Soc 8:437–479
Huang CD, Behara RS, Hu Q (2008) Managing risk propagation in extended enterprise networks. IT Pro July/August, pp 114–119
IAIS (2013) Global systemically important insurers: initial assessment methodology. International association of insurance supervisors, 18 July 2013
McGettrick A, Boyle R, Ibbett R, Lloyd J, Lovegrove G, Mander K (2005) Grand challenges in computing: education – summary. Comput J 48(1):42–48
Mertens P (1995) Wirtschaftsinformatik – Von den Moden zum Trend. In: König W (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik ‘95: Wettbewerbsfähigkeit – Innovation – Wirtschaftlichkeit. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 25–64
Mertens P (2014) Automatische Berichterstattung an Kontrollorgane. Control Manag Rev 58(Sonderheft 1):8–15
Mertens P, Barbian D (2013) Forschung über „Grand Challenges“– Eine „Grand Challenge“. Working paper Nr. 1/2013, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg. http://www.wi1.uni-erlangen.de/sites/wi1.uni-erlangen.de/files/arbeitsbericht_grandchallenges.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2015
Mertens P, Barbian D (2014) Die Wirtschaftsinformatik der Zukunft – auch eine Wissenschaft der Netze? HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 51(6):729–743
Mertens P, Meier MC (2009) Integrierte Informationsverarbeitung 2 – Planungs- und Kontrollsysteme in der Industrie, 10th edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden
Mertens P, Zeller AJ, Große-Wilde J (2012) Kooperative Vorhersage in Unternehmensnetzwerken. In: Mertens P, Rässler S (eds) Prognoserechnung, 7th edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 621–637
National Academies (2008) Grand challenges for engineering. National Academy of sciences on behalf of the national academy of engineering, Washington. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/. Accessed 18 May 2015
National Science Foundation (2011) Advisory committee for cyberinfrastructure, task force on grand challenges. Final report. https://www.nsf.gov/cise/aci/taskforces/TaskForceReport_GrandChallenges.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015
Österle H, Senger E (2011) Prozessgestaltung und IT: Von der Unternehmens- zur Konsumentensicht. Control Manag 55(Sonderheft 2):80–88
Renner K-H (2014) Hoffen auf die “Nanodegrees“. Handelsblatt Nr. 186, 26 Sept 2014
Samuelson PA (2004) Where Ricardo and Mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization. J Econ Perspect 18(3):135–146
Singhal P, Agarwal G, Mittal ML (2011) Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. J Bus Sci Appl Manag 6(3):15–34
Thome R, Schinzer H (2005) Konsultative Assistenzsysteme für E-Government. Wirtschaftsinformatik 47(5):326–336
United Nations (2013a) (ed) The millennium development goals report. New York. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 18 May 2015
United Nations (2013b) (ed) A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. New York. http://www.post2015hlp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/UN-Report.pdf. Accessed 02 May 2015
Vitali S, Glattfelder JB, Battiston S (2011) The network of global corporate control. Zürich
Wassermann AG (ed) (2009) White box APS: Kombination von Optimierung und Erfahrungswissen. Unpublished paper, Munich
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted after one revision by Prof. Dr. Bichler.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mertens, P., Barbian, D. Researching “Grand Challenges”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57, 391–403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0405-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0405-1