Skip to main content
Log in

A note on ranking of L-R fuzzy numbers

  • TECHNICAL NOTE
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous ranking methods have been proposed and investigated so-far. Most of the ranking methods discussed only normal fuzzy numbers, but in many cases (such as risk analysis, approximate reasoning, etc.,) the normal fuzzy number is not adequate. In this paper, we introduced a new ranking method based on weighted expected values of the fuzzy numbers which can be applied for both normal and non-normal fuzzy numbers. The weighted expected interval is the nearest interval for the given fuzzy number. Furthermore, the proposed method compared with the existing methods through numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Jain, R.: A procedure for multi-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets. Internat. J. Syst. Sci. 8, 1–7 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S.J., and Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making and applications. Lector notes in Economics and Mathematical systems. Springer, New York (1992)

  3. Baldwin, J.F., Guild, N.C.: Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2, 213–231 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baas, S.M., Wakernaak, H.K.: Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternative using fuzzy sets. Automatica 13, 47–58 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, S.R., Weiss, J.J., Donnell, M.L.: Fuzzy decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. SMC 9, 1–9 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerre, E.E.: The use of fuzzy set theory in electro cardio-logical diagnostics in M.M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Eds., Approximate Reasoning in Decision analysis (1982) 277–282.

  7. Kolodziejczyk, W.: Orlovsky’s concept of decision making with fuzzy preference relation-further results. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 19, 11–20 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura, K.: Preference relation on a set of fuzzy utilities as a basis for decision making. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 20, 147–162 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yager, R.R.: On choosing between fuzzy subsets. Kybernetes 9, 151–154 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adamo, J.M.: Fuzzy decision tress. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 4, 207–220 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buckley, J.J., Chanas, S.: A fast method of ranking alternatives using fuzzy number (short communications). Fuzzy Set. Syst. 30, 337–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mabuchi, S.: An approach to the comparison of fuzzy subsets with an α – cut dependent index. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. SMC 18, 264–272 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delgado, M., Verdegay, J.L., Villa, M.A.: A procedure for ranking fuzzy numbers using fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 26, 49–62 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Parde, H.: Ranking of fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory. Inform. Sci. 30, 183–224 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, S.H.: Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Set Syst. 17, 113–129 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, R.: Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. SMC 6, 698–703 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami, S., Maedz, S., and Imamura, S.: Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control system. IFAC Symp. on Fuzzy Inform. Knowledge Representation and decision anal. (1983) 363–368.

  18. Yager, R.R.: On a general class of fuzzy connectives. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 4, 235–242 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liou, T.S., Wang, M.J.J.: Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 50, 247–255 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yager, R.R.: A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of unit interval. Inform. Sci. 24, 143–161 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tong, R.M., and Bonissone, P.P.: Solutions to fuzzy decision problems in H.J. Zimmermann, Ed., TIMS/Studies in the Management Seience, 20 (Elsevier Amsterdam, 1984) 323–334.

  22. Cheny, C.-H.: A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 95, 307–317 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu, T.C., Tsao, C.T.: Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Comput. Math. Appl. 43, 111–117 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y.-J., Lee, H.-S.: The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points. Comput. Math. Appl. 55, 2033–2042 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., Dong-Ling, X., Chin, K.-S.: On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 157, 919–926 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thanks to the Editor-in-Chief and anonymous referees for the various suggestions which have led to an improvement in both the quality and clarity of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Veeramani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veeramani, C., Duraisamy, C. & Sumathi, M. A note on ranking of L-R fuzzy numbers. OPSEARCH 50, 282–296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-012-0109-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-012-0109-y

Keywords

AMS subject classification

Navigation