Skip to main content
Log in

The Darwin -Wallace myth of 1858

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the Zoological Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A careful reading of the 1858 papers by Charles Darwin and Alfred R. Wallace reveals that Wallace did not present a complete nomological theory of evolution and cannot be considered a co-discover of the theory of evolution by natural selection. Darwin must have misinterpreted Wallace’s manuscript and became paranoid that Wallace came up with the same detailed theory he conceived and worked on for more than two decades. Darwin biased both Hooker and Lyell about Wallace having presented exactly the same theory that he had been developing for the past two decades, and they further biased readers of the published papers. The central point in Wallace’s paper was that modifications observed under domestication are not true evolutionary changes as they reverted back to the original condition if the domesticated form became feral. This forms the origin of the myth that both Darwin and Wallace discovered the theory of evolution by natural selection. Wallace did advocate the cause of selective agents, but not the other essential causes for phyletic evolution. Charles Darwin alone must be credited with the development of this new paradigm of biological evolution which proved to be one of the major changes in human thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, Thomas, 1859. Annual address of President Bell at the Anniversary Meeting, Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 4: viii–xx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. 1979. The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change — a reductionist approach. Bulletin Carnegie Museum, 13:20–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J.1980. The definition and recognition of biological adaptation. Amer. Zool., 20:217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. 1993. Selection and fitness; definitions and uses; 1859 and now. Proc. Zool. Soc. Calcutta, Haldane Comm. Vol., pp. 7–26.

  • Bock, Walter J. 2002. The role of the external environment in evolutionary theory. Pp. 63–80, In, Schmitt, M. (ed.) Synecology and Evolution — Gerd von Wahlert’s Approach to Evolutionary Biology. Bonner zoologische Monographien vol. 50. 216 pp.

  • Bock, Walter J. 2003. Ecological aspects of the evolutionary processes. Zoological Science 20:279–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. 2004. Explanations in systematics. Pp. 49–56. In Williams, D.M. and Forey, P.L. (eds) Milestones in Systematics. London: Systematics Association Special Volume Series 67. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. 2007a. Explanations in Evolutionary Theory. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 45:89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. 2007b. Reply to Zachos’s letter. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 45(4): 379–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, Walter J. and Gerd von Wahlert. 1965.Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution, 19:269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1974. Darwin’s concepts of variation. Journal of the History of Medicine, 29: 196–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1976. Alfred Russel Wallace’s concepts of variation. Journal of the History of Medicine, 31: 17–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brackman, Arnold C, 1989. A delicate arrangement. The strange case of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. New York, Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, John L. 1984. Just before the origin. Alfred Russel Wallace’s theory of evolution. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert, 1844. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. London., John Churchill. [1994, Chicago, Univ. Chicago Press]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard, 1985. Three notes on the reception of Darwin”s ideas on natural selection (Henry Baker Tristran, Alfred Newton, Samuel Wilberforce. In, David Kohn, Ed. The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwkins, Richard, 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwkins, Richard, 1982. The extended phenotype. The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford, Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles, 1858. On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 3: 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles, 1859. On the origin of species. London, John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles, 1909. The foundations of the Origin of Species. The essays written in 1842 and 1844. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayson, Nicholas, 2002. Confessing a murder. New York, W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisley, L. 1979. Darwin and the mysterious Mr. X. New York E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The genetic theory of natural selection. Oxford, Clarendon Press. [Revised Edition, New York, Dover.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, Douglas J. 1979. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates (2nd edition, 1986; 3rd edition, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, Douglas J. 2005. Evolution. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Thomas F (editor), 1988. The comparative reception of Darwinism, with a new preface. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. 1932. The causes of evolution. New York, Longmans, Greene. [1966 Ithaca, NY. Cornell University Press.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.J.S., 1991. Origins and species. A study of the historical sources of Darwinism and the contexts of some other accounts of organic diversity from Plato and Aristotle on. New York & London, Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottler, Malcolm J. 1985. Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace”-Two decades of Debate over natural selection. In, David Kohn, Ed. The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 367–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, H. Lewis, 1972. Wallace and natural selection. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst, 1985. Darwin’s five theories of evolution. In, David Kohn, Ed. The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 755–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst, 2001. What evolution is. New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst, 2004. What Makes Biology Unique. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. J. 1960. The role of population dynamics in natural populations. In, Sol Tax, Ed. The evolution of life. Its origin, history and future. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, PP. 477–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tristan, H.B. 1859. On the ornithology of Northern Africa (Sahara). Ibis (October):429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Alfred R. 1855. On the Law Which Has Regulated the Introduction of New Species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 16 (2nd Series): 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Alfred R. 1858. On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 3: 53–632.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter J. Bock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bock, W.J. The Darwin -Wallace myth of 1858. Proc Zool Soc 62, 1–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-009-0001-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-009-0001-9

Keywords

Navigation