Skip to main content
Log in

Pollicization of the index finger in hypoplasia of the thumb. Experience with the method of Buck-Gramcko and retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome in a series of 19 pollicizations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery

Abstract

Background

In congenital malformation of the thumb index finger pollicization is a proven method for constructing a new thumb all over the world.

Methods

A series of 19 pollicizations in 15 patients is presented. In all cases of index finger pollicization the method of Buck-Gramcko is used and the functional outcome is evaluated after Percival’s method. Three special cases are described in detail and the preoperative evaluation with a CT-angiography in cases of complex malformations (case 3) for better planning of the surgical steps is recommended. The importance of parent’s information soon after giving birth to a child with thumb hypoplasia is described in detail as the postoperative management.

Results

In children with bilateral deformities of the hand the surgery can be performed in one session, in only 2 cases a second operation was necessary. The postoperative results were excellent and good (Percival’s measurement) and the children are now able to perfectly use their affected hand in their day-to-day activities.

Conclusion

Buck-Gramcko’s method of pollicization in congenital thumb malformation gives excellent results. The preoperative planning and exactly following the four key steps is as important as the postoperative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buck-Gramcko D (1969) Operativer Daumenersatz bei Aplasie und Hypoplasie. Beilage Z Orthop 105:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foucher G, Medina J, Loréa P, Pivato G, Szabó Z (2004) Pollicization in congenital differences. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 36:146–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lister G (1985) Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 195:52–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buck-Gramcko D (1971) Pollicization of the index finger: method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg 53A:1605–1617

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buck-Gramcko D (1998) Pollicization. congenital malformations of the hand and forearm. Churchill Livingstone

  6. Müller W (1937) Die angeborenen Fehlbildungen der menschlichen Hand. Thieme Leipzig

  7. Blauth W (1967) Der hypoplastische Daumen. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 62:225–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishijima N, Matsumoto T, Ymamuro T (1995) Two stage reconstruction for the hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg 20A:415–419.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shibata M, Yoshizu T, Seki T, Goto M, Saito H, Tajima T (1998) Reconstruction of a congenital hypoplastic thumb with use of a free vascularized metatarsophalangeal Joint. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:1469–1476

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gosset J (1949) La Pollicisation de L’index (technique chirurgicale). J Chir (Paris) 65:403–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilgenfeld O (1950) Operativer Daumenersatz und Beseitigung von Greifstörungen bei Fingerverlusten. Enke Stuttgart

  12. Littler JW (1953) The neurovascular pedicle method of digital transposition for reconstruction of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 12:303–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aliu O, Netscher DT, Staines KG (2008) A 5-year interval evaluation of function after pollicization for congenital thumb aplasia using multiple outcome measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:198–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foucher G, Medina J (2005) Principalization of pollicization of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 9:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Percival NJ, Sykes PJ, Chandraprakasam T (1991) A method of assessment of pollicization. J Hand Surg 16B:141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Staines KG, Majzoub R, Thornby J, Netscher DT (2005) Functional outcome for children with thumb aplasia undergoing pollicization. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1314–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hostin R, James MA (2004) Reconstruction of the Hypoplastic Thumb. Am Soc Surg Hand 4:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R, Nagel D (2001) Toe transfer in congenital hand malformations. J Reconstr Microsurg 17:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brian BM, Black JM, Morrison WA, MacLeod AM (1978) Microvascular great toe transfer for congenital absence of the thumb. Hand 10:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdel-Ghani H, Amro S (2004) Characteristics of patients with hypoplastic thumb: a prospective study of 51 patients with the results of surgical treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B13:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goldfarb CA, Deardorff V, Chia B, Meander A, Manske PR (2007) Objective features and aesthetic outcome of pollicised digits compared with normal thumbs. J Hand Surg 32A:1031–1036

    Google Scholar 

  22. Loréa P, Medina J, Navarro R, Foucher G (2008) Principalisation of pollicization in congenital conditions. Technical modifications for functional and aesthetic improvement. Chir Main 27(Suppl 1):540–547

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klein MB, Karanas YL, Chow LC, Rubin GD, Chang J (2003) Early experience with computed tomographic angiography in microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:498–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piza-Katzer Hildegunde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hildegunde, PK., Andrea, W., Eva-Maria, B. et al. Pollicization of the index finger in hypoplasia of the thumb. Experience with the method of Buck-Gramcko and retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome in a series of 19 pollicizations. J Hand Microsurg 1, 17–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-009-0009-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-009-0009-4

Keywords

Navigation