Abstract
Background
Functional outcome in surgical treatment of Neer three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) varies greatly and depends on multiple parameters. Important parameters are the amount and direction of displacement and the necessary reduction of fragments during surgery. These are patient-specific parameters and are difficult to determine using traditional modalities such as radiographs and computed tomography (CT).
Methods
A 58-year-old female patient was reported in the emergency department with a three-part PHF. CT scan images showed that the humeral shaft was medialised and internally rotated, but with a marginally displaced greater tuberosity fragment. Using a bone-determined range of motion (ROM) simulation system, we analysed the CT scan and calculated the required correction needed to prevent post-operative impingement. The fracture was reduced and stabilised by a locking plate, realigning the medialised and internally rotated humeral shaft. The post-operative bone-determined ROM was determined using a post-operative CT scan and the motion simulation system.
Results
ROM limitations due to bony impingement visible in the simulations of the pre-operative CT scan had mostly disappeared in the simulations of the post-operative CT scan. Twelve weeks post-surgery the patient has regained close to 80% of her ROM.
Conclusions
This case demonstrates the applicability of a new diagnostic tool that can be used to identify bony impingement and helps in making the decision for conservative or surgical treatment of a PHF. The simulation of post-trauma function was indicative of functional outcome. This supports our claim that the system may be used to facilitate the treatment decision regarding PHF.
Introduction
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are more prevalent in elderly; the incidence rate is approximately 73/100,000 [1]. Depending on fracture severity, treatment can range from conservative to arthroplasty. Decision is based on age and patient expectations, on assessment of radiographs or computed tomography (CT) and on different fracture classification systems [2, 3]. However, the different classification systems have been much disputed for reproducibility and effectiveness in predicting outcome [4].
The severe implications of treatment decisions combined with the subjectivity of PHF classification systems encouraged us to investigate whether a computerised functional assessment of fractures adds support to optimal treatment decision. A critical aspect in the prediction of outcome of PHFs is altered bony morphology, leading to loss of range of motion (ROM) and persisting pain. In this report, we demonstrate the clinical use of a CT-based computerised functional simulation model in a relative young patient with a Neer three-part PHF.
Case report
The patient was a 58-year-old healthy woman who fell from her bike. Physical examination at the emergency department revealed a painful, slightly swollen right shoulder with ecchymosis, without neurovascular injury. X-rays (Fig. 1) showed a three-part PHF.
In this case, radiographs alone could potentially lead to misdiagnosing this fracture as a two-part with only slight medial displacement. CT imaging revealed a three-part fracture with significant medial displacement of the humeral shaft (23 mm) and internal rotation of 38°. Subsequently, the CT was analysed with Articulis software (Clinical Graphics, Den Haag, The Netherlands), designed for assessment and simulation of bone-determined ROM. It uses a kinematic model and collision detection to predict ROM, described in detail by Krekel et al. [5, 6]
Pre-operative simulation of ROM, assuming the fracture would have healed in this configuration, indicated that the available range of external rotation in 0° adduction would be limited to 4°, due to medialisation and rotation of the humeral shaft. According to the simulations, this limitation of external rotation would be nullified beyond 45° of abduction, giving rise to the question whether this would be problematic in daily life. Although the greater tuberosity was clearly displaced, the ROM simulations did not show impingement between the greater tuberosity and the acromial arch (Fig. 2).
Conservative treatment was chosen because the predicted deficiency in ROM would not be limiting. However, in the first week of immobilisation, secondary radiologic displacement of fracture (further medialisation of the humeral shaft) occurred, probably due to displacing forces of amongst others teres minor and pectoralis major muscles. Therefore, it was decided to perform open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), with an angular stable locking plate (Litos Tifix, Hamburg). Figure 3 shows post-operative radiographs.
Active forward flexion and circumduction were initiated directly post-operative. After 2 weeks, active physiotherapy was allowed with maximum forward flexion of 90° and external rotation of 20°, followed by unrestricted training after 6 weeks. The patient gave an informed consent prior being included into this study.
Radiological outcome and motion analysis
Post-operatively, ROM simulations indicated that external rotation in adduction was now limited to 20°. Beyond 20° of abduction, no limitation of external rotation and no impingement of the greater tuberosity occurred (Fig. 4). Plain follow-up X-rays showed normal fracture healing without secondary displacement or early signs of avascular necrosis.
Discussion
There is an ongoing discussion whether or not to operate on PHF especially in the elderly patient, as sufficient proof from large prospective randomised clinical trials is lacking. A recent Cochrane analysis showed that three- and four-part fractures may not heal unless an adequate reduction and stabilisation are performed [9]. However, the very limited evidence available does not confirm that surgery is preferable to conservative treatment and complications associated with surgery need to be considered [10]. In this case, we first decided to treat the patient conservatively as the external rotation was mainly limited in adduction. However, due to secondary displacement, we decided to perform surgery. A second pre-operative CT scan for functional analysis was not performed, in order to minimise radiation exposure, since there was an indication for surgical treatment. We are confident that the analysis of the secondary displacement would have shown worse functional outcome.
The post-operative analysis showed a clear improvement of external rotation due to ORIF of the fracture. Despite the relatively short follow-up (12 weeks), functional recovery had already almost reached the predicted functional outcome levels. External rotation in adduction had reached 15°. This is a good clinical outcome when compared to the predicted 4° for conservative treatment. It resembles the results of surgically treated PHFs found by Südkamp et al. [7]. The relatively small amount of posterior displacement of the greater tuberosity did not present a posterior impingement or a deficit in ROM in CT analysis. It is expected that further exercise can improve ROM in the next months.
As restoration of ROM, besides pain relief, should play a central role in choosing a treatment, this new technique may provide surgeons with a better tool to predict surgical success and patient satisfaction. The ability to choose patients that may benefit the most from surgery in an early stage of the treatment may not only improve functional outcome after surgically treatment, but also provide for a better informed consent.
Of course the key to success for this new CT-based simulation in predicting post-fracture ROM is its correlation to clinical outcome. Although just one case was evaluated, we believe that it is a promising technique to predict post-fracture ROM, assuming there is no additional pathology to the rotator cuff and abductor mechanism (deltoid muscle and axillary nerve). The hypothesis is that it is a helpful tool for choosing between conservative or operative treatment and should in the future be tested using a randomised controlled trial.
References
Van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29(6):517–522
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Should Elbow Surg 13(4):427–433
Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 52(6):1077–1089
Siebenrock KA, Gerber C (1993) The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 75(12):1751–1755
Krekel PR, Botha CP, Valstar ER, de Bruin PW, Rozing PM, Post FH (2006) Interactive simulation and comparative visualisation of the bone-determined range of motion of the human shoulder. In: Schulze T, Horton G, Preim B, Schlechtweg S (eds) Proceedings of simulation and visualization. SCS Publishing House, Erlangen, pp 275–288
Krekel PR, de Bruin PW, Valstar ER, Post FH, Rozing PM, Botha CP (2009) Evaluation of bone impingement prediction in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty. J Eng Med Part H: Proc IMechE 223(7):813–822
Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kääb M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt, Köstler W, Konrad G (2010) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 91(6):1320–1328
Ricchetti ET, Warrender WJ, Abboud JA (2010) Use of locking plates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Should Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):66–75
Handoll HH, Gibson JN, Madhok R (2003) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (4) CD000434
Young TB, Wallace WA (1985) Conservative treatment of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the upper end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(3):373–377
Conflict of interest
The authors reported no conflict of interest.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Vochteloo, A.J.H., Krekel, P.R., van de Sande, M.A.J. et al. Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures: a case study. Eur Orthop Traumatol 2, 153–156 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0080-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0080-8