Abstract
This study adopted a novel text mining (TM) technique in curriculum studies to analyze the multi-layered South Korean curriculum document (CD) system from 2012 to 2017. A total of 716 CDs from the national, regional, and school levels corresponding to 23.4 million Korean characters were examined through keyword frequency analysis, topic modeling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), construction of text network with clusters, and document vectorization. The results reveal the decentralized nature of each CD layer; i.e., the regional CD (RCD) mediates the national CD (NCD) to the school CD (SCD), and the SCD plays a key role in the implementation of diverse student-centered learning experiences. However, when the similarity (reversely distance) between the average CD vectors of each layer was examined, the SCD showed a constant trend of recentralization toward NCD. This study suggests that the adoption of TM techniques in curriculum studies would enhance the methodological progress of this field in accordance with conventional CD understanding, revealing novel aspects with reproducible and consistent results from a much larger dataset.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although the 2015 RNC is the latest, we chose the 2009 RNC for reasons explained in Chapter III.
https://github.com/open-korean-text/open-korean-text (Retrieved Sep 24th, 2020)
There are 2 Korean terms, which can be translated as “subject” – “과목” (gwamok) and “교과” (gyoggwa). As the meanings of those two terms do not differ significantly, we presented “과목” as “subject (1)” and “교과” as “subject (2).” If we do not operationally separate these two terms, the shapes of the text networks would be different from those of the originals based on Korean tokens. Note that subject (1) and subject (2) appeared in the same cluster 4 of the RCD (Table 8). This demonstrates the validity of the network analysis, as semantically equivalent tokens were included in the same cluster.
In literal meaning, “하다”(hada) in Korean corresponds to “do” in English. However, there is ongoing academic debate regarding its usage and grammatical functions, as it has 11 different roles, including use as verbs, suffixes, and auxiliary verbs (Yu 2015). “하다” is regularly attached to most nouns to yield general forms in the Korean language, where 65% of the headwords of the Standard Korean Dictionary are in the form of noun + “하다.” Thus, treating “하다” like other verbs would not be appropriate in Korean text mining. Meanwhile, as “하다” is a very frequent term in Korean language, if it is excluded from semantic document analysis that considers sequences of terms, serious problems result because of information loss. Thus, we included “하다” in our analysis but do not discuss its function in the body of the article.
More focus was put on 2013–2017 in the following descriptions because the SCD data from 2012 are not well preserved in institutional repositories.
References
Ahn, T., & Kwon, S. (2014). English education programs for developing creativity and personality at English education model schools. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(4), 139–159.
Akrom, M. A. (2015). The mirage of curriculum decentralization: a case study of local stakeholders' involvement in school-based curriculum development (SBCD) policy implementation in Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University).
Anandkumar, A., Foster, D. P., Hsu, D., Kakade, S. M., & Liu, Y. K. (2015). A spectral algorithm for Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Algorithmica, 72, 193–214.
Anjewierden, A., Kolloffel, B., & Hulshof, C. (2007). Towards educational data mining: Using data mining methods for automated chat analysis to understand and support inquiry learning processes. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Applying Data Mining in e-Learning (ADML 2007) as part of the 2nd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2007), Crete, Greece.
Astiz, M. F., Wiseman, A. W., & Baker, D. P. (2002). Slouching towards decentralization: Consequences of globalization for curricular control in national education systems. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 66–88.
Bae, J.-H. (2019). A comparative study on topics of old stories in elementary Korean textbooks using LDA. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 69, 299–330.
Behrman, J. R., Deolalikar, A. B., & Soon. L.-Y. (2002). Conceptual Issues in the Role of Education Decentralization in Promoting Effective Schooling in Asian Developing Countries. Asian Development Bank. ERD Working Paper Series No. 22.
Bjork, C. (2003). Local responses to decentralization policy in Indonesia. Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 184–216.
Bjork, C. (Ed.). (2006). Educational Decentralization: Asian experiences and conceptual contributions (Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
Chowdhury, G. G. (2005). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 51–89.
Chun, L. Y. (1999). School-based curriculum development: The Hong Kong experience. Curriculum Journal, 10(3), 419–442.
Chung, Y.-K. (2011). A theoretical study on the “creative experience activities.” The Korea Educational Review, 17(2), 73–95.
Chung, Y. S., Go, J.-S., Kang, O. H., & Suh, J. H. (2012). The development of community-based work experience program for youth. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 31(1), 217–240.
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6), 066111–066116.
Clune, W. H. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy: Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 233–254.
Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.
Feng, D. (2006). China’s recent curriculum reform: Progress and problems. Planning and Changing, 37(1–2), 131–144.
Fesler, L., Dee, T., Baker, R., & Evans, B. (2019). Text as data methods for education research. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(4), 707–727.
Ferreira-Mello, R., André, M., Pinheiro, A., Costa, E., & Romero, C. (2019). Text mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(6), e1332.
Fortino, A., Zhong, Q., Huang, W., & Lowrance, R. (2019, March). Application of Text Data Mining To STEM Curriculum Selection and Development. In 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 354–361). IEEE.
Gim, C.-C. (2010). An analysis of the possibilities and limitations of the National Curriculum 2009 in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(3), 57–83.
Go, I.-G. (2016). The key concept study of agriculture unit in practical arts based on big data analysis methods. Journal of Leaner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(4), 431–450.
Han, M., Yoon, D., & Choi, Y. (2019). All about labor: Text mining analysis of high school social studies textbooks from the 2007 to 2015 Revised Curriculum. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(4), 301–330.
Hanson, E. M. (1997). Educational decentralization: Issues and Challenges. Occasional Paper no. 9. Santiago: Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas.
Hawkins, J. N. (2000). Centralization, decentralization, recentralization: Education reform in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 442–454.
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159.
Hong, H. J., Yoon, H. J., & Woo, A. J. (2012). Science teachers’ recognition of creativity-personality education as applied to science teaching. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(4), 887–908.
Hung, J. L. (2012). Trends of e-learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16.
Hyndman, B., & Pill, S. (2018). What’s in a concept? A Leximancer text mining analysis of physical literacy across the international literature. European Physical Education Review, 24(3), 292–313.
Jang, Y.-M., & Kim, Y. K. (2018). Content analysis of food and nutrition unit in middle school textbooks of home economics - Focus on the National Curriculums from 1st to 2009 Revised. Journal of Korean Home Economic Education Association, 30(4), 93–112.
Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, C., Feng, X., Jiang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Topic modeling: models, applications, a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(11), 15169–15211.
Jeong, K. (2013). The free semester policy and improving teaching and learning in middle school. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 399–421.
Jung, W.-K., Lee, J.-K., & Oh, S. W. (2011). Investigation on the difficulties during middle school students’ finding inquiry topics on open-inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1199–1213.
Kang, H.-S., & Jeon, H.–J, . (2013). In search of the analysis and tasks of the curriculum policy related 100 excellent schools. The Korea Educational Review, 19(3), 45–75.
Kang, N. H., & Lee, E. M. (2013). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school physics textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 132–143.
Karolyi, M., Komenda, M., Janoušová, R., Víta, M., & Schwarz, D. (2017). Finding overlapping terms in medical and health care curriculum using text mining methods: reha. MEFANET Journal, 4(2), 71–77.
Kawintiranon, K., Vateekul, P., Suchato, A., & Punyabukkana, P. (2016). Understanding knowledge areas in curriculum through text mining from course materials. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 161–168). IEEE.
Kim, D. H. (1994). The rights and responsibilities of the elementary schools for successful implementation of the Sixth National Curriculum. The Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 33–44.
Kim, E. G. (2006). Educational decentralization in Korea: Major issues and controversies. In Bjork, C. (Ed.) (2006). Educational Decentralization: Asian experiences and conceptual contributions (Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects Vol. 8) (Springer Science & Business Media), (pp. 115–128).
Kim, E. J. (2016). A study on the improvement plans through analysing the MPOE curriculum arrangement and implementation guideline. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 37(4), 43–70.
Kim, G. (2019). Kim’s Natural Language Processing Deep Learning Camp (volume PyTorch). Seoul: Hanbit Media.
Kim, I.-Y. (1996). Analysis of district curriculum guide of Gyeong-Nam and process of curriculum developing in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Education Research, 6, 3–28.
Kim, M. (2015). A Study on the improvement of regional curriculum operation. Journal of Social Science, 32(1), 77–96.
Kim, M.-Y., Lee, C. C., Han, K. H., Yoon, P. K., & Cho, S. K. (2012). Development of creative experience activity programs based on career education for guidance of homeroom-based club activities. The Journal of Educational Studies, 43(1), 33–61.
Kim, S. (2013). A study on the types of career development of vocational high school students. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 16(2), 179–204.
Kim, S.-W., Chung, Y. L., Woo, A. J., & Lee, H. (2012). Development of a theoretical model for STEAM education. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 388–401.
Ko, J. (2014). A study on results and issues of the direct superintendent election by residence in 2014. The Journal of Law of Education, 26(3), 1–25.
Kwak, M., Min, H., & Kim, M. (2019). Analysis of students open-ended course evaluation using topic modeling. Asian Journal of Education, 20(2), 491–522.
Lee, G. (2019). Sentence embedding using Korean Corpora. Seoul: Acornpub.
Lee, G.-G., Ha, H., Hong, H.-G., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploratory research on automating the analysis of scientific argumentation using machine learning. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 219–234.
Lee, J., & Park, D. (2014). Do American and Korean education systems converge? Tracking school reform policies and outcomes in Korea and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 391–399.
Lee, J.–K. (2004). Globalization and higher education: A South Korean perspective. Globalization, 4.
Lee, M. H., & Gopinathan, S. (2001). Centralized decentralization of higher education in Singapore. Education and Society, 19(3), 79–97.
Lee, Y. (2014). Political change and development of centralized curriculum policy in South Korea. In Pinar. W. F. (Ed.). International Handbook of Curriculum Research (Taylor & Francis) (pp. 290–298).
Lee, Y.-J., & Choi, K.-E. (2013). Development of the creativity and character educational program of the clothing & textiles area for creative activities. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(1), 83–100.
Leer, J. (2016). After the Big Bang: Estimating the effects of decentralization on educational outcomes in Indonesia through a difference-in-differences analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 80–90.
Lim, Y., & Hong, H. (2016). A study on the problems and improvement ways of multi-layered system in the development of curriculum standards documents. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(1), 55–77.
Lin, F. R., Hsieh, L. S., & Chuang, F. T. (2009). Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining. Computers & Education, 52(2), 481–495.
Lucas, C., Nielsen, R. A., Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Storer, A., & Tingley, D. (2015). Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis, 23(2), 254–277.
Martí-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676.
McGinn, N., & Welsh, T. (1999). Decentralization of education: Why, when, what and how? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Min, Y. (2008). The limitations and possibilities on expanding the autonomy of school curriculum in Korea: An analysis of the 2007 new national curriculum organization and implementation guidelines. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 137–158.
Ministry of Education [MOE] (1992). High School Curriculum (I).
Ministry of Education [MOE] (1997). High School Curriculum (I).
Ministry of Education [MOE] (2016). Exposition on the General Guideline of National Curriculum.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MOEST] (2009a). Exposition on the General Guideline of National Curriculum.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MOEST] (2009b). General Guideline of National Curriculum.
Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, & Seoul Education Research & Information Institute [MOE and SERII] (2001). Analysis Research on the Metropolis-Province Office of Education Curriculum Guideline on High School.
Park, E. L., & Cho, S. (2014). KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology, Chuncheon, Korea.
Park, I.-S. (2010). A study on the development of a conceptual model for school curriculum evaluation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(1), 113–134.
Park, J., Cho, W.-S., & Lee, J.-B. (2017). Text mining analysis of practical arts curriculum using R. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(2), 17–33.
Park, J., Kim, J., Cho, W., & Lee, J. (2018). Text network analysis of high school career and vocation curriculum. The Journal of Career Education Research, 31(1), 63–80.
Park, M.-J., & Sung, Y.-K. (2011). Trends of curriculum research: Research areas and methods analysis. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(4), 25–46.
Park, S. (2003). A discussion on the efficiency of curriculum localization in the process of national curriculum implementation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(1), 111–127.
Park, S.-K. (2008). A beginning discussion on searching for the startingpoint and direction of curriculum decentralization in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 87–105.
Park, Y.-H. (2012). A critical review of the teacher-student reading discussion club and suggestions for the future. The Journal of Language & Literature, 50, 61–90.
Rehurek, R., & Sojka, P. (2010). Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks (pp. 45–50).
Presidential Commission on Education Reform [PCER] Report (1997). Education Reform for the 21st Century (Seoul: PCER).
Rho, M. J. (2013). A comparative study on the localization of elementary school curriculum: Focusing on organization and implementation guidelines prescribed by provincial level (Master’s thesis, Korea National University of Education).
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.
Shin, H. S., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The gifted students` view on argumentation and the aspects of the argumentation in problem-solving type experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(4), 567–586.
Shon, M. H. (2011). The possibility and limits of competence based curriculum. Journal of Educational Research & Implementation, 10(1), 101–121.
So, K., & Kang, J. (2014). Curriculum reform in Korea: Issues and challenges for twenty-first century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 795–803.
So, K. (2017). Understanding curriculum. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (statistical methodology), 64(4), 583–639.
Sung, E., & Jung, H. (2013). Communities participating strategies for facilitating experience-based youth career education. The Journal of Career Education Research, 26(4), 49–63.
Tyack, D. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In J. Hannaway & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement: Can we fulfil the promise? (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Utomo, E. (2005). Challenges of curriculum reform in the context of decentralization: The response of teachers to a competence-based curriculum (CBC) and its implementation in schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Walberg, H. J., Paik, S. J., Komukai, A., & Freeman, K. (2000). Decentralization: An international perspective. Educational Horizons, 78(3), 153–164.
Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., & Benoit, K. (2017). Text analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–265.
West, J. (2017). Validating curriculum development using text mining. The Curriculum Journal, 28(3), 389–402.
Yazdi, S. V. (2013). Review of centralization and decentralization approaches to curriculum development in Iran. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(4), 97.
Yeom, M., Acedo, C., & Utomo, E. (2002). The reform of secondary education in Indonesia during the 1990s: Basic education expansion and quality improvement through curriculum decentralization. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(1), 56–68.
Yoon, J., Blumer, A., & Lee, K. (2006). An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality. Bioinformatics, 22(24), 3106–3108.
Yu, K. M. (2015). A study of meaning about noun+ha-verb for Korean education. Education of Korean Language and Literature, 32, 57–81.
Yu, S. A. (2012). An analysis of organization and implementation of creative activity curriculum: 100-excellent school in curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(2), 83–109.
Zhang, G., Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Qiu, W. (2012). Policy changes and educational reforms in China: Decentralization and marketization. On the Horizon, 20(4), 313–323.
Funding
This research is supported by The Center for Educational Research funded by the Seoul National University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Stopwords list
Appendix B: Korean–English dictionary
Korean | English | Korean | English | Korean | English | Korean | English |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
가다 | Go, proceed, attend | 도덕 | Ethics, morals | 운영 | Management, operation | 토론 | Discussion, debate |
개발 | Development | 독서 | Reading | 이수 | Complete; to finish doing something | 편성 | Organization, formation |
고등학교 | High school | 동아리 | School club | 이해 | Understanding | 평가 | Evaluation, assessment |
과목 | Subject (1); an area of knowledge that is studied in school | 따르다 | Follow, go after | 인성 | Personality | 표현 | expression |
과정 | Course; a set of classes or a Plan of study on a particular subject | 문제 | Question, problem | 일반 | General; involving or relating to most or all people, things or places | 프로그램 | Program |
교과 | Subject (2)t; an area of knowledge that is studied in school | 미술 | Art, fine art | 전문 | (one’s) speciality | 하다 | DO |
교육 | Education | 방법 | Method | 중심 | CORE, center | 학교 | School |
교육과정 | Curriculum | 사회 | Society | 지도 | Guidance | 학기 | Semester |
국가 | Nation | 산업 | Industry | 지식 | Knowledge | 학년 | Grade; a school class in which all the children are of a similar age |
기르다 | Bring up, grow, train | 생활 | Life, livelihood | 직무 | Duty | 학부모 | Parents, school parents |
기본 | Basics | 수업 | Class; a period of time in which students are taught something | 직업 | Job | 학생 | Student |
기술 | Skill, technology | 수준 | Level | 진로 | Career | 학습 | Study, learning |
기업 | Business, company, corporation | 수학 | Mathematics | 참여 | Participate | 해결 | Settle, solve |
기초 | Fundamental, foundation | 실무 | Practical affairs, service, administrative work | 창의 | Creativity | 현장 | Field |
꿈 | Dream | 실습 | Practice; the act of doing something regularly to improve skill at doing it | 체험 | Experience | 활동 | Activity |
내용 | Content, substance | 업체 | Business, enterprise | 취업 | Get a job, find employment | 활용 | Application, practical use, utilization |
능력 | Ability, capacity | 역량 | Competency | 탐구 | Research, inquiry | ||
단위 | Unit; a single thing or a separate part of something | 영어 | English (language) | 태도 | Attitude, manner |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, GG., Jang, W. & Hong, HG. Decentralization and recentralization of Korean curriculum documents 2012–2017: a novel approach to text mining in curriculum studies. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 22, 349–369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09677-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09677-x