Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing choosing teaching as a career: South Korean preservice teachers

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study validated the underlying factor structure of the Factors Influencing Teaching (FIT)-Choice survey in the South Korea context and examined motivations and perceptions of 903 Korean preservice teachers by major demographic characteristics. Secondary preservice teachers reported significantly higher values than elementary preservice teachers for Qualification fit and desire to teach and Task return. Male preservice teachers believed more strongly than female preservice teachers that they chose the teaching profession because of Qualification fit, Influencing others, and Task return. Compared to freshmen/sophomores, juniors/seniors reported significantly higher values for Task demand. Participants with low- to medium-level self-reported income ($12K–$46K) weighted Benefits significantly higher than those with medium-level income ($46K–$88K). STEM majors reported higher values for the Qualification fit and Influencing others than non-STEM majors. As South Korea is one of the few countries which has an oversupply of highly qualified teacher candidates, findings were compared with other countries to provide useful insights to improve recruitment of highly qualified individuals to teaching workforce in many countries where teacher shortage is a chronic problem. Based on these data analyses, we argue that policy makers, politicians, education researchers, and others who care about quality education and student academic achievements need to make efforts to increase task returns and benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The graduation rate was calculated based on this formula: (the total graduation number/total entry number to high school three years ago) × 100.

  2. For instance, among many other factors, private secondary teachers have fewer opportunities for teacher training and promotion. While the public school system provides in-service teachers with a variety of in-service training programs, private school foundations tend to make very limited funds available for teacher training. Promotion to various leadership positions is open to public school teachers both at the school and the district/state level, whereas only limited promotion opportunities are available for private school teachers (Yum and Park 2013).

  3. The term “cram school” [hagwon in Korean] refers to a private institute that specializes in helping students achieve better GPAs and prepare for the entrance exams of prestigious high schools or universities.

  4. In South Korea, the academic year begins at the beginning of March and ends at the end of December in postsecondary institutions.

  5. We applied the National Tax Service’s (2017) individual income tax index. The index originally had five brackets including “above $300,000” the highest. We collapsed it to “above $88,000” for data analysis because only limited numbers of participants belonged to the highest bracket.

  6. Because college students in South Korea tend to live with their parents until they graduate from college and/or get married, we asked participants to identify the household annual income instead of their individual income.

References

  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. Retrieved from https://mck.co/2rxSOiw.

  • Bastick, T. (2000). Why teacher trainees chose the teaching profession: Comparing trainees in metropolitan and developing countries. International Review of Education, 6(3), 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.-L., & D’Ascoli, Y. (2012). Becoming a VET teacher as a second career: Investigating the determinants of career choice and their relation to perceptions about prior occupation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.-L., Girardet, C., Vaudroz, C., & Aprea, C. (2017). The motivational basis of classroom management practices and beliefs of Swiss vocational teachers. Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 126–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brandmo, C., & Nesje, K. (2017). Factors motivating students to become secondary school teachers: Evidence from Norway. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 95–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brookheart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Education Research, 62, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. S., & Lee, H. J. (2011). Exploring preservice science teachers’ motivation for career choice and their self-image as a science teacher. Korean Science Education Journal, 31(1), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D. (2011). If you pay peanuts do you get monkeys? A cross-country analysis of teacher pay and pupil performance. Economic Policy, 26(1), 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2010.00257.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 110(Winter), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren, A., & Tezel, K. V. (2010). Factors influencing teaching choice, professional plans about teaching, and future time perspective: A mediational analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1416–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eren, A., & Yeşilbursa, A. (2017). Exploring the relationships between prospective Turkish teachers’ hopes, motivations and professional plans. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global perspectives on teacher motivation (pp. 248–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Canrinus, E. T. (2012). The factors influencing teaching (FIT)-Choice scale in a Dutch teacher education program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratacós, G., López-Gómez, E., Nicito, G., & Sastre, S. (2017). Why teach? Antecedents and consequences in Spain. In H. M. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 55–94). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. W., Borgonovi, F., & Guerriero, S. (2018). What motivates high school students to want to be teachers? The role of salary, working conditions, and societal evaluations about occupations in a comparative perspective. American Education Research Journal, 55(1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., Piopiunik, M., & Wiederhold, S. (2014). The value of smarter teachers: International evidence on teacher cognitive skills and student performance. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, M., Keane, E., & Foley, C. (2017). Career motivations of student teachers in the Republic of Ireland: Continuity and change during educational reform and “boom to bust” economic times. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 22–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heo, S. (2016). Characteristics of choosing teaching as a career among history preservice teachers. [in Korean]. Student-Centered Curriculum Studies, 16(2), 1103–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. (1999). [Open Discussion] Develop attractive plans for better working conditions to remedy male teacher shortage. [in Korean]. JungAng Newspaper. Retrieved from https://news.joins.com/article/3750312.

  • IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Ver. 24.0). Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, C. H., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (1992). Perceptions and attitudes on teaching among elementary preservice teachers. [in Korean]. Journal of Student Guidance, 18, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen, J. M. (1981). Why college students choose to teach: A longitudinal study. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718103200210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jugović, I., Marusić, I., & Vidovic, V. V. (2012). Motivation and personality of preservice teachers in Croatia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, Y. C., Myung, S. W., & Sim, H. Y. (2006). Computer education curriculum and instruction: Computer pre-service preservice teachers’ motivations of entering college of education, pedagogical content Knowledge, study of subject matter, and vision formation. [in Korean]. Computer Education in Korea, 9(3), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılınç, A., Watt, M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2012). Factors influencing teaching choice in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. G. (2014). Results of “the 2013 international analysis of teachers’ social status index” and implications to Korean policy of teachers. [in Korean]. Korean Educational Development Institute. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2si9TOy.

  • Kim, E. K., & Han, S. I. (2006). Factor analysis on motivations to choose teaching as a career among secondary preservice teachers: Case of mathematics teachers. [in Korean]. Korean Education, 33(2), 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. K., & Han, Y. K. (2002). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: Background report for Korea R&B report. KEDI. [in Korean]. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/korean.pdf.

  • Kim, H. (March 4, 2011). [Human & Issue] Any solutions for rapid overflow of females in the teaching pool. Seoul Newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20110304009007.

  • Kim, H. K., Ko, D. H., Kim, Y. B., & Choi, S. S. (2015). Studies on conflicts caused by socio-economic stratification in South Korea and resolution strategies. [in Korean]. Presidential Committee for National Cohesion (PCNC) R&B Report. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2xuJUbz.

  • Kim, N. (1995). A study on the attitude of teaching college students. [in Korean]. Korean Teacher Education, 11, 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. (2003). A study on the attitude of teaching college students. [in Korean]. Journal of School Guidance, 22(1), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (1979). A Study on economic status of teachers in Inchon city [in Korean]. Collections of Studies in Education, 10, 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, J., & Rothland, M. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: Effects on general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Educational Statistics Service (KESS). (2017). Basic statistics on schools. [in Korean]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2KXks0h.

  • Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE). (2016). National level tests. [in Korean]. Retrieved from http://www.kice.re.kr/sub/info.do?m=0206&s=english.

  • Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). (2017). Census 2016. [in Korean]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2FoHJJD.

  • Kunter, M., Tsai, Y.-M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18, 468–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kye, B. H., & Hwang, S. J. (2017). Changes in occupational status evaluation in South Korea: 1990–2016. [in Korean]. Statistics Studies, 22(3), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., Karabenick, S. A., Carpenter, R., & Kuusinen, C. (2017). Teacher motivation and professional commitment in the United States: The role of motivations for teaching, teacher self-efficacy and sense of professional responsibility. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 322–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (May 27, 2007). Teachers rated high on their social contribution, but think their socio-economic status is low. No Cut News. Retrieved from http://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/298348.

  • Lent, R., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1993). Predicting mathematics-related choice and success behaviors: Test of an expanded social cognitive model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E., Shi, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, S., & Hui, L. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching: Comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marušić, I., Jugović, I., & Ivanec, T. P. (2017). How personality dimensions and motivation to teach shape the learning achievement goals of Croatian future teachers. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 220–242). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2015). Current trends of teacher training programs. Sejong-shi: Ministry of Education School Policy Department. [in Korean].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2016). Elementary and secondary education: Graduation rates. [In Korean]. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/sub/info.do?m=040602&s=moe.

  • Moran, A., Kilpatrick, R., Abbott, L., Dallatt, J., & McClune, B. (2001). Training to teach: Motivating factors and implications for recruitment. Evaluation and Research in Education, 15, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na, H. Y. (2009). Motivations for choosing human geography, knowledge of the subject, and inner vision among secondary preservice teachers. [in Korean]. Master’s thesis in Ewha Women’s University.

  • National Tax Service. (2017). Individual income tax index. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2xAxhf4.

  • Neittaanmäki, L., Gross, E. B., Virjo, I., Hyppölä, H., & Kumpusalo, B. (1999). Personal values of male and female doctors: Gender aspects. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofested). (2001). The annual report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools: Standards and qualify in education 2000/01. London: Office of Standards in Education.

  • Oh, D. H. (2016). “What percentage of quintile my salary is placed?”… 3,200 of average individual income. Money Today. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2sm5mKX.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Background report for the international summit on the teaching profession. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2013). Education at a glance 2013: Indicators and annexes. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2xwh6zu.

  • Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2005). ‘I’ve decided to become a teacher’: Influences on career change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., Keith, T., & Page, E. (1983). Now who aspires to teach? Educational Researcher, 12(6), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saban, A. (2003). Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teachers and their views of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(8), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education [SMOE]. (2018). Notice on final successful candidates at the 2018 teacher recruitment examination. [in Korean] Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2sAlGY3.

  • Song, Y. (1984). A survey of the C.T.C. Students’ angles on the teaching profession [in Korean]. The Studies of Student Guidance, 7, 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, V. (May 14, 2017). In Arizona, teachers can now be hired with absolutely no training in how to teach. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com.

  • Suryani, A. (2017). Motivations and aspirations of teacher education students in Indonesia. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardson & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 297–321). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taimalu, M., Luik, P., & Täht, K. (2017). Teaching motivations and perceptions during the first year of teacher education in Estonia. In H. G. Watt, P. W. Richardsoon & K. Smith (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation (pp. 189–220). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T. (October, 2003). Report on the P-Teacher Education and Development Study (P-TEDS) Report of the East Lansing Meeting.

  • Tatto, M. T. (February, 2004). Report on the P-Teacher Education and Development Study (P-TEDS) Mexico City.

  • Varkey, G. E. M. S., & Foundation (2013). Global teacher status index. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2LaS1fv.

  • Vegas, E., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2001). From high school to teaching: Many steps, who makes it? Teachers College Record, 103(3), 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. G., Richardson, P. W., & Smith, K. (2017). Global perspectives on teacher motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., & Pietsch, J. (2009). Choosing to teach in the “STEM” disciplines: Characteristics and motivations of Science, Technology, and Mathematics teachers from Australia and the United States. In A. Selkirk & M. Tchoenor (Eds.), Teacher education: Policy, practice, and research (pp. 285–309). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, B. C. S. (1995). Teacher trainees’ motives for entering into a teaching career in Brunei Darus salam. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, H. J., Chung, T. I., & Kim, W. H. (2010). Perception and determinants of teachers’ social and economic status in Korea. The Journal of Korean Education, 37(1), 83–111. [in Korean].

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, I. K. (2017). 2018 final competition rates for the secondary public school secondary teacher recruitment exams. [in Korean]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JlFjgU.

  • Yűce, K., Şahin, E. Y., Koçer, Ö, & Kana, F. (2013). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: A perspective of pre-service teachers from a Turkish context. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yum, J., & Park, S. (2013). Studies on the disparities in the status of private teachers. The Private Secondary School Teachers Association. [in Korean]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2GihCph.

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Chonbuk National University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Ok Kang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Factors Influencing Teaching Choice (FIT-choice) survey items in English and Korean

Appendix 1: Factors Influencing Teaching Choice (FIT-choice) survey items in English and Korean

figure a
figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JA., Kang, M.O. & Park, B.J. Factors influencing choosing teaching as a career: South Korean preservice teachers. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 467–488 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09579-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09579-z

Keywords

Navigation