Skip to main content
Log in

A structural equation model (SEM) of the impact of transformational, visionary, charismatic and ethical leadership styles on the development of wise leadership among Filipino private secondary school principals

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, wisdom is seen as a key resource for school leaders in dealing with the dynamics of the changing school environments. This study purports to expand the growing interest on wisdom by testing a model that describes the impact of transformational, visionary, charismatic and ethical leadership styles on wise leadership development among a select group of 320 Filipino secondary school principals through structural equation modeling. A multi-aspect questionnaire was used to characterize the respondent principals’ leadership orientation and styles. Specifically, the following adapted tools were used: the Transformational Leadership Behavior Inventory, the Ethical Leadership Scale, the Charismatic Leadership Scale, the Visionary Leadership Scale and the Wisdom Development Scale. Results of the structural equation model revealed that: (1) each of the four types of leadership has a significant positive impact on wise leadership development, (2) high charismatic qualities of principals could lead to higher capability for wise leadership, (3) transformational and visionary leadership appeared to have the most impact on wise leadership development and (4) five pairs of leadership styles (visionary and charismatic, charismatic and ethical, transformational and ethical, transformational and visionary, and transformational and charismatic) when any of them is practiced by the school principals indicate stronger effect on wise leadership. Implications for practice, theory and policy are also discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AM Azure Consulting Ltd. (2008). Seven pillars of wisdom. Retrieved May 2, 2012 from http://www.amazureconsulting.com.

  • Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of the three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. B., & Kessler, E. H. (2007). Handbook of organizational and managerial wisdom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and management applications (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Technical report for the MLQ (2nd ed.). Redwood: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedell-Avers, K., Hunter, S. T., Angie, A. D., Eubanks, D. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: An examination of leader-leader interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(93), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berson, Y., Shamir, B., Avolio, B. J., & Popper, M. (2001). The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K., & Hooijberg, R. (2001). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. C. (2004a). Where this path may lead: Understanding post-college decision- making. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. C. (2004b). Learning across campus: How college facilitates the development of wisdom. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buendia, R., & Brillantes, B. (2006). Mapping and analysis of indigenous governance practices in the Philippines and proposal for establishing an indicative framework for indigenous people’s governance towards a broader and inclusive process of governance in the Philippines (Final Report). Retrieved May 12, 2012 from http://www.undp.org.

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., Hsiao, H., & Tu, Y. (2011). Beside using transformational leadership, what should schools do to achieve innovation? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. S. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foil, C. M., Harris, D., & House, R. J. (1999). Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 449–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, J., Konig, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Straber, I., et al. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(405), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, R., & Griffin, D. (2001). Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: Every “one” matters. Psychological Methods, 6(3), 258–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordijin, E. J., & Stapel, D. A. (2008). When controversial leaders with charisma are effective: The influence of terror on the need for vision and impact of mixed attitudinal messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Brown, S. C. (2009). The wisdom development scale: Further validity investigations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 68(4), 289–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V., Surie, G., Javidan, M., & Chhokar, J. (2002). Southern Asia Cluster: Where the old meets the new? Journal of World Business, 37, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornedo, F. (2000). Taming the wind: Ethno-cultural history on the Ivatan of the Batanes Isles. Manila: University of Santo Tomas Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (1977). A 1976 Theory of charismatic Leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale, Il: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Prospectives and directions (pp. 81–108). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Wang, Z., Liden, R., & Sun, J. (2012). The influence of leader core self-evaluation on follower reports of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 860–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandaghi, Gh, Matin, H. Z., & Farjami, A. (2008). Comparing transformational leadership in successful and unsuccessful companies. African Journal of Business Management, 3(7), 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocano, F. L. (1998). Anthropology of the Filipino people. Manila: PUNLAD Research House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N., Kakabadse, A., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Visioning the pathway: A leadership process model. European Management Journal, 23(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micro politics of teacher induction: A narrative bibliographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers, W. M. (2007). Phenomenology and integral pheno-practice of wisdom in leadership and organization. Social Epistemology, 2(2), 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. K. C., Cheng, T. C. E., Yeung, A. C. L., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An empirical study of transformational leadership, team performance and service quality in retail banks. Omega, 39(6), 690–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limas, M. J., & Hansson, R. O. (2004). Organizational wisdom. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59(2), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loon, S. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, H. (2004). Talisman, leadership, and power: The belief in magical potency continues to pervade Filipino life. Retrieved May 5, 2012 from http://www.ucca.gov.ph.

  • McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Boal, K. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclaughlin, C. (2001).Visionary leadership. Retrieved March 22, 2010 from http://www.visionarylead.org.

  • Meindl, J. R. (1993). Visionary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(3–4), 398–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M., Antes, A., Caughron, J., & Friedrich, T. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, A. (2012). Leadership wisdom and the perspective of time. Retrieved May 5, 2012 from http://www.integralleadershipreview.com.

  • Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K., Rude, S., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2007). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 908–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasupathi, M., Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Seeds of wisdom: Adolescents’ knowledge and judgment about difficult life problems. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leaders, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnu, C., & Tennakoon, G. (2009). The association between ethical leadership and employee outcomes- the malaysian case. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 14(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, D., McKenna, B., & Liesch, P. (2010). Wisdom and management in knowledge economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2006). What do we need to know about wisdom? Management Decision, 44(9), 1246–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J., & Gibbs, P. (2008). From learning organization to practically wise organization. The Learning Organization, 15(5), 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, B. (1999). Testing causal explanations in organismal biology: causation, correlation and structural equation modelling. Oikos, 86, 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficiency and teacher burn-out: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1996). Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 746–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom, M., & Ledoux, L. (2010). Arts of the wise leader. Retrieved May 2, 2012 from http://www.philosophies-management.com.

  • Sy, T., Choi, J., & Johnson, S. (2013). Reciprocal interactions between group perceptions of leader charisma and group mood through mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. J. (2011). Wise management in organisational complexity. Retrieved May 5, 2012 from http://www.eiasm.org.

  • Thompson, M. J., & Eynikel, J. (2010). Leading with wisdom: Spirituality as a basis for leadership. Retrieved May 5, 2012 from http://www.ceibs.edu.

  • Van der Helm, R. (2009). The vision phenomenon: Towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures, 41, 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968). On charisma and institution building. USA: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yulk, G. (1999a). An evaluation of the conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yulk, G. (1999b). An evaluative essay on current conceptualizations of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., Riggio, R., & Sosik, J. J. (2011). The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: Does transformational/transactional style make a difference? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(2), 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan B. de Guzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parco-Tropicales, M., de Guzman, A.B. A structural equation model (SEM) of the impact of transformational, visionary, charismatic and ethical leadership styles on the development of wise leadership among Filipino private secondary school principals. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 15, 547–559 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9346-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9346-5

Keywords

Navigation