Skip to main content
Log in

Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Bonferroni Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Group Decision Making

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The power Bonferroni mean (PBM) operator can take the advantages of power operator and Bonferroni mean operator, which can overcome the influence of the unreasonable attribute values and can also consider the interaction between two attributes. However, it cannot be used to process the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs). It is importantly meaningful to extend the PBM operator to IVIFNs. We extend PBM operator to process IVIFNs and propose some new PBM operators for IVIFNs and apply them to solve the multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems. Firstly, the definition, properties, score function, and operational rules of IVIFNs are introduced briefly. Then, the power Bonferroni mean (IVIFPBM) operator, the weighted PBM (IVIFWPBM) operator, the power geometric BM (IVIFPGBM) operator, and the weighted power geometric BM (IVIFWPGBM) operator for IVIFNs are proposed. Furthermore, some deserved properties of them are explored, and several special cases are analyzed. The decision-making methods are developed to deal with the MAGDM problems with the information of the IVIFNs based on the proposed operators, and by an illustrative example, the proposed methods are verified, and their advantages are explained by comparing with the other methods. The proposed methods can effectively solve the MAGDM problems with the IVIFNs, and they can consider the interaction between two attributes and overcome the influence of the unreasonable attribute values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8:338–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20(1):87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov KT. More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1989;33(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov KT. Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994;64:159–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atanassov KT, Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems 1989; 31: (3)343–349.

  6. Liu XD, Zheng SH, Xiong FI. Entropy and subsethood for general interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. 2005;42-52

  7. Zhang HY, Zhang WX, Mei CL. Entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets based on distance and its relationship with similarity measure. Knowl-Based Syst. 2009;22(3):449–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang JQ, Li KJ, Zhang HY. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect score function. Knowl-Based Syst. 2012;27(3):119–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Du B, Zhang L. Target detection based on a dynamic subspace. Pattern Recogn. 2014;47(1):344–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Du B, Zhang L. A discriminative metric learning based anomaly detection method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2014;52(11):6844–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu ZS, Yager RR. Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making. 2009;8:123–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan C, Zhang Q. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the 2006 I.E. international conference on system, man, and cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan. Republic of China. 2006;2:1404–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hashemi SS, Razavi Hajiagha SH, Zavadskas EK, Mahdiraji HA. Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Appl Math Model. 2016;40(2):1554–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Xu J. A fractional programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE international conference on decision and control 2010; 636–641.

  15. Czubenko M, Kowalczuk Z, Ordys A. Autonomous driver based on an intelligent system of decision-making. Cogn Comput. 2015;7(5):569–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Liu PD. Some Heronian mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 2015;21(5):797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li YH, Liu PD, Chen YB. Some single valued neutrosophic number Heronian mean operators and their application in multiple attribute group decision making.Informatica 2016; 27(1): 85–110.

  18. Liu PD. Some generalized dependent aggregation operators with intuitionistic linguistic numbers and their application to group decision making. J Comput Syst Sci. 2013;79(1):131–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu PD. Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2014;22(1):83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu PD, Chen YB, Chu YC. Intuitionistic uncertain linguistic weighted Bonferroni OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Cybern Syst. 2014;45(5):418–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu PD, Jin F. Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making. Information Sciences 2012; 205 (2)(2012) 58–71.

  22. Liu PD, Li Y, Antuchevičienė J. A multi-criteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy prioritized OWA operator. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 2016;22(3):453–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu PD, Liu ZM, Zhang X. Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making. Appl Math Comput. 2014;230:570–86.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu PD, Tang GL. Multi-criteria group decision-making based on interval neutrosophic uncertain linguistic variables and Choquet integral. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(6):1036–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meng FY, Wang C, Chen XH. Linguistic interval hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision making. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(1):52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei GW, Yi WD. Induced interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy OWG operator. In Proceedings of fifth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery 2008; 605–609.

  27. Xu ZS. Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control and Decision. 2007;22(2):215–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu ZS, Chen J. On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery 2007; 466–471.

  29. Xu ZS, Chen J. Approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Systems Engineering – Theory and Practice. 2007;27(4):126–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu DJ, Wu YY, Lu T. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst. 2012;30(5):57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang HY, Ji P, Wang JQ, et al. A neutrosophic normal cloud and its application in decision-making. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao H, Xu ZS, Ni MF, Liu S. Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst. 2010;25(2):1–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yager RR. The power average operator. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans. 2001;31(6):724–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu ZS, Yager RR. Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2010;18(1):94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonferroni C. Sulle medie multiple di potenze. Bolletino Matematica Italiana. 1950;5:267–70.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xia MM. Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means. Inf Sci. 2010;205(1):72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  37. He YD, He Z. Extensions of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2016;24(3):558–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. He YD, He Z, Chen HY. Intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and its application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2015;45(1):116–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. He YD, He Z, Chao J, Chen HY. Intuitionistic fuzzy power geometric Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2015;23:285–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. He YD, He Z, Deng YJ, Zhou PP. IFPBMs and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Oper Res Soc. 2016;67(1):127–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. He YD, He Z, Wang G, et al. Hesitant fuzzy power Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2015;23(3):1655–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu ZS. Models for multiple attribute decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy information. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based System. 2007;15(3):285–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang WZ, Liu XW. Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2012;20(5):923–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen SM, Lee LW, Liu HC, Yang SW. Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(3):10343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. He YD, Chen H, Zhou L, Liu J, Tao Z. Generalized interval-valued atanassovs intuitionistic fuzzy power operators and their application to group decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2013;15(4):401–11.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xu ZS, Chen Q. A multi-criteria decision making procedure based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 2011;20(2):217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 71471172 and 71271124), the Special Funds of Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province, National Soft Science Project of China (no. 2014GXQ4D192), Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Project (nos. 15BGLJ06, 16CGLJ31, and 16CKJJ27), the Teaching Reform Research Project of Undergraduate Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province (no. 2015Z057), and Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (no. 2016GNC110016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peide Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Li, H. Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Bonferroni Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Group Decision Making. Cogn Comput 9, 494–512 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9453-9

Keywords

Navigation