Skip to main content
Log in

Fast Learning Mapping Schemes for Robotic Hand–Eye Coordination

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In aiming for advanced robotic systems that autonomously and permanently readapt to changing and uncertain environments, we introduce a scheme of fast learning and readaptation of robotic sensorimotor mappings based on biological mechanisms underpinning the development and maintenance of accurate human reaching. The study presents a range of experiments, using two distinct computational architectures, on both learning and realignment of robotic hand–eye coordination. Analysis of the results provide insights into the putative parameters and mechanisms required for fast readaptation and generalization from both a robotic and biological perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aslin RN, Salapatek P. Saccadic localization of visual targets by very young human infant. Percept Psychophys. 1975;17:293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bedford FL. Keeping perception accurate. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthier NE, Keen R. Development of reaching in infancy. Exp Brain Res. 2006;169:507–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature. 2002;416:632–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao F, Lee MH, Lee JJ. A developmental algorithm for oculomotor coordination. Edinburgh: TAROS. 2008. p. 72–8.

  6. Clifton RK, Muir DW, Ashmead DH, Clarkson MG. Is visually guided reaching in early infancy a myth. Child Dev. 1993;64:1099–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraiberg S, Siegel BL, Gibson R. The role of sound in the search behavior of a blind infant. Psychoanal Study Child. 1966;21:327–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerin F, McKenzie D. A piagetian model of early sensrimotor development.Brighton. UK Epigenetic: Robotics; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann H, Schenk W, Möller R. Learning visuomotor transformations for gaze-control and grasping. Biol Cybern. 2005;93:119130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hülse M, McBride S, Lee M. Robotic hand–eye coordination without global reference: a biologically inspired learning scheme. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Developmental Learning, ICDL 2009, Shanghai, China; 2009

  11. Lee MH, Meng Q, Chao F. Developmental learning for autonomous robots. Rob Auton Syst. 2007; 55(9):750–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Redding GM, Wallace B. Generalization of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006;32:1006–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson SR, Kleven GA. Learning to move before birth. In: Hopkins B, Johnson SP, editors. Prenatal development of postnatal functions. Westport: Praeger Publishers. p. 131–75

  14. Spencer JP, Clearfield M, Corbetta D, Ulrich B, Buchanan P, Schöner G. Moving toward a grand theory of development: in memory of Esther Thelen. Child Dev. 2006;77:1521–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thelen E, Corbetta D, Kamm K, Spencer JP, Schneider K, Zernicke RF. The transition to reaching-mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. Child Dev. 1993;64:1058–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Von Hofsten C. Developmental changes in the organization of prereaching movements. Devl Psychol. 1984;20:378–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallace MT (2003) Cross-modal neural development. In: Quinlan PT, editors. Connectionist models of development. Guildford: Biddles Ltd. p. 312–43

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hülse.

Additional information

This work was supported by EU-FP7 projects IM-CLeVeR and ROSSI and by EPSRC, UK through grant EP/C516303/1.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Uncertainty of the Active Vision System

In order to evaluate these results in relation to the uncertainty of the active vision system, the average tilt–verge values for specific object locations were also derived (Table 7). One can see that the vision system has a uncertainty of ≈0.002 rad in average for tilt and verge motors. The complete vision domain, however, is approximately 0.2 rad3. Therefore, out of 2.5 × 107 distinguishable samples in the vision space, our method requires only 300 examples to achieve the given performance in robotic hand–eye coordination.

Table 7 Average and standard deviation of tilt, verge left and verge right values delivered by active vision system resulting from the saccade toward an object on the table at specific positions

Appendix 2: Approximation of \({\mathcal{S}}\) in \(A_{\mathcal{S}}\)

The parameters for approximating the shifts in visual space via quadratic and linear regression as well as the simple mean value are summarized in Table 8. The quadratic functions provide the best match, which are plotted in Fig. 14 overlaid by the actual offset values derived from the mappings \({\mathcal{R}}_C\) and \({\mathcal{R}}_S\)

Table 8 Parameters for the functions Δ (x) =  ax 2 + bx + c approximating the offset in visual space
Fig. 14
figure 14

Empirical data representing the offset needed to shift the points in visual space in order to compensate the change from the centered to the shifted arm–vision configuration. The three diagrams show the offsets of a component over its absolute value for tilt (top), verge left (middle) and verge right (bottom). In addition, the trend lines for the quadratic approximation are shown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hülse, M., McBride, S. & Lee, M. Fast Learning Mapping Schemes for Robotic Hand–Eye Coordination. Cogn Comput 2, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9030-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9030-y

Keywords

Navigation