Skip to main content
Log in

An Automated Extracorporeal Knot-tying System Using Two Concentric Tube Robotic Arms for Deployment through a 3-mm Port

  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ligation is a process of closing or blocking a blood vessel or duct intracorporeally to obstruct the flow of fluid before cutting it. Ligation through knot tying using a suture is a quite complex procedure and needs the use of dexterous tools to properly secure the knot. In case of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), ligation through suture knot tying is even more difficult because of the small diameters of the accessible ports. In this study, a robotic solution for suture ligation has been proposed for possible use in SILS and NOTES. The developed device can operate through a 3-mm laparoscopic port and has a workspace of 35 × 10x5 mm (length × width x height) around the duct. The device uses a pre-tied Roeder’s knot, which is pushed down onto the duct by the operation of two concentric tube-based manipulator arms. Preliminary evaluation validates that the device can work around a phantom duct with 7 mm outer diameter without any collisions. The operation takes an average of 128.10 s with a standard deviation of 15.72 s. The knot tied is secure enough to abduct the fluid flow inside the duct, which is validated by testing on a water-filled rubber tube. The proposed device assists surgeons for suture ligation in SILS and NOTES without the requirement for any other tools and with a possibility of decreasing the operating time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Jaffray, “Minimally invasive surgery,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 537–542, January 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Cuschieri, “Single-incision laparoscopic surgery,” Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3, January 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. H. Baron, “Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1–2, January 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Gomes, “Surgical robotics: reviewing the past, analysing the present, imagining the future,” Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 261–266, April 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Xu, C. Zhou, and S. Y. Ko, “Closed-loop planar fuzzy control system for a curvature-controllable steerable bevel-tip needle,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2421–2431, October 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hussain, A. Malik, M. U. Halim, and A. M. Ali, “The use of robotics in surgery: a review,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1376–1382, November 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. E. Carter, “Suture? Staple? Electrosurgery? How to decide what is best for you,” JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 171, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Croce and S. Olmi, “Intracorporeal knot-tying and suturing techniques in laparoscopic surgery: technical details,” JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–22, January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Akindele, A. O. Fasanu, S. C. Mondal, J. Komolafe, and R. K. Mishra, “Comparing extracorporeal knots in la-paroscopy using knot and loop securities,” World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery with DVD, vol. 7, pp. 28–32, April 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. L. Seaman, C. J. Gostout, J. G. de la Mora Levy, and M. A. Knipschield, “Tissue anchors for transmural gut-wall apposition,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 577–581, October 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Mintz, S. Horgan, J. Cullen, D. Stuart, E. Falor, and M. A. Talamini, “NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 583–587, August 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G.-R. Haber, S. Crouzet, K. Kamoi, A. Berger, M. Aron, R. Goel, D. Canes, M. Desai, I. S. Gill, and J. H. Kaouk, “Robotic NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience,” Urology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 996–1000, June 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Safavi-Naeini, M. Razavi, M. Saeed, A. Rasekh, and A. Massumi, “A review of the LARIAT suture delivery device for left atrial appendage closure,” J. Tehran Univ. Heart Cent, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 69, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Arulampalam, S. Paterson-Brown, A. Morris, and M. Parker, “Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,” The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 456–459, September 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. U. Farooq, W. Y. Kim, and S. Y. Ko, “A robotic suture-passing device for possible use in SILS and NOTES,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 14, no. 5, el916, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Burgner-Kahrs, D. C. Rucker, and H. Choset, “Continuum robots for medical applications: a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1261–1280, December 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. E. Dupont, J. Lock, B. Itkowitz, and E. Butler, “Design and control of concentric-tube robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 209–225, April 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. W. Duerig, A. Pelton, and D. Stockel, “An overview of nitinol medical applications,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 273, pp. 149–160, December 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. E. Dupont, A. Gosline, N. Vasilyev, J. Lock, E. Butler, C. Folk, A. Cohen, R. Chen, G. Schmitz, H. Ren, and P. D. Nido, “Concentric tube robots for minimally invasive surgery,” Proc. of Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics, pp. 8. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. U. Farooq, S. Park, J.-O. Park, and S. Y. Ko, “Shape optimization of a novel ligation tool using a concentric tube mechanism,” Proc. of International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 413–418, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. U. Farooq, W. Y. Kim, and S. Y. Ko, “A cost-effective and miniaturized actuation system for two three-tube concentric tube robots with parallel actuation,” Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 1382–1386, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. R. Rengen and D. G. Adler, “Detachable snares (en-doloop),” Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12–15, January 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K. R. Van Sickle, E. M. Ritter, M. Baghai, A. E. Goldenberg, I.-P. Huang, A. G. Gallagher, and C. D. Smith, “Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of curriculum-based training for intracorporeal suturing and knot tying,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 207, no. 4, pp. 560–568, October 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Stefanidis, F. Wang, J. R. Korndorffer, J. B. Dunne, and D. J. Scott, “Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 377–382, February 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. J. Swaney, A. W. Mahoney, A. A. Remirez, E. Lamers, B. I. Hartley, R. H. Feins, R. Alterovitz, and R. J. Webster, “Tendons, concentric tubes, and a bevel tip: Three steer-able robots in one transoral lung access system,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5378–5383, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. B. Gilbert and R. J. Webster III, “Rapid, reliable shape setting of superelastic nitinol for prototyping robots,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 98–105, November 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Young Ko.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Sukho Park under the direction of Editor Doo Yong Lee. This work was supported by the Industrial Technology Innovation Program (No. 10080609) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Muhammad Umar Farooq received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, (PIEAS Islamabad) in 2015. He is currently pursuing a doctoral degree from Chonnam National University, Korea after graduating from Master’s in Mechanical Engineering in 2017 from the same institute. His research interests include surgical robots, medical instruments and concentric tube robots.

Seong Young Ko received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2000, 2002, and 2008, respectively. From 2009 to 2011, he was a research associate in the Mechatronics-In-Medicine Laboratory, the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, UK. From October 2011, he was an assistant professor and is now an associate professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. His research interests include medical robotics, human-robot interaction and intelligent control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farooq, M.U., Ko, S.Y. An Automated Extracorporeal Knot-tying System Using Two Concentric Tube Robotic Arms for Deployment through a 3-mm Port. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0424-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-018-0424-z

Keywords

Navigation