Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Real time health care big data analytics model for improved QoS in cardiac disease prediction with IoT devices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

the problem of big data analytics and health care support systems are analyzed. There exist several techniques in supporting such analytics and robust support systems; still, they suffer to achieve higher performance in disease prediction and generating the analysis.. For a hospital unit, maintaining such massive data becomes a headache. However, still, the big data can be accessed towards analyzing the bio signals obtained from the human body for the detection and prediction of various diseases. To overcome the deficiency, an efficient Health Care Big Data Analytics Model (HCBDA) is presented, which maintains a massive volume of data in the data server.

Methods

The HCBDA model monitors the patients for their current state in their cardiac and anatomic conditions to predict the diseases and risks. To perform analysis on health care, the model has accessed the data location by discovering the possible routes to reach the source. The monitored results on blood pressure, temperature, and blood sugar are transferred through the list of routes available. The network is constructed with a list of sensor nodes and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, where the sensor attached to the patient initiates the transmission with the monitored results. The monitored results are transferred through the number of intermediate nodes to the monitoring system, which accesses the big data to generate intelligence. The route selection is performed according to the value of Trusted Forwarding Weight (TFW) and Trusted Carrier Weight (TCW). At each reception, the features from the packet are extracted, and obtained values are fed to the decisive support system. The decisive support system cluster the big data using the FDS clustering algorithm, and the classification is performed by measuring the feature disease class similarity (FDCS). According to the class identified, the method would calculate Disease Prone Weight (DPW) to generate recommendations to the medical practitioner.

Results

The unique Health Care Big Data Analytics (HCBDA) paradigm for patient-centered healthcare using wireless sensor networks and IoT devices was described. The patient's bio signals are watched in order to provide medical assistance. In comparison to the previous methods, the proposed approach helps to generate higher performance in disease prediction accuracy up to 96%.

Conclusion

The value of Trusted Forwarding Weight (TFW) and Trusted Carrier Weight is used to determine the route (TCW). Sensor based IoT values like Pressure glucose, pulse oximeter, and temperature etc. the following parameters like classification accuracy and false ratio are calculated based on efficient machine learning model. The crucial support system receives the values it receives after each reception together with the features that were derived from the packet. The classification is carried out by calculating the Feature Disease Class Similarity, and the decision support system clusters the huge data using the FDS clustering technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code is available from the first author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. AlShammari NK, Qazi EU, Gabr AM, Alzamil AA, Alshammari AS, Albadran SM, Reddy GT. Post-stroke rehabilitation optimization & recommendation framework using tele-robotic ecosystem: Industry 4.0 readiness approach. J Intel Fuzzy Syst (Preprint). 2023;1–11. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-221295.

  2. Kandati DR, Gadekallu TR. Federated Learning Approach for Early Detection of Chest Lesion Caused by COVID-19 Infection Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Electronics. 2023;12(3):710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravi V, Pham TD, Alazab M. Attention-based multidimensional deep learning approach for cross-architecture IoMT malware detection and classification in healthcare cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans Computational Social Syst. 2022.

  4. Ravi V, Alazab M, Selvaganapathy S, Chaganti R. A Multi-View attention-based deep learning framework for malware detection in smart healthcare systems. Comput Commun. 2022;195:73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandya S, Gadekallu TR, Reddy PK, Wang W, Alazab M. InfusedHeart: A novel knowledge-infused learning framework for diagnosis of cardiovascular events. IEEE Trans Computational Social Syst. 2022.

  6. Mualuko M. Routing Optimization for Wireless Sensor Networks using Fuzzy Ant Colony. (IJAER). 2017;12(21):11606–11613.

  7. Deepa O. An optimized QoS-based clustering with multipath routing protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. J King Saud Univ Comp Inform Sci. 2017.

  8. Guo W. Optimizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks via reinforcement-learning-based routing. (IJDSN). 2019;15(2).

  9. Khan A, Ali I, Rahman AU, Imran M, Mahmood H. Co-EEORS: Cooperative Energy Efficient Optimal Relay Selection Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In IEEE Access. 2018;6:28777–28789.

  10. Kumar N, Vidyarthi DP. A Green Routing Algorithm for IoT-Enabled Software Defined Wireless Sensor Network. IEEE Sens J. 2018;18(22):9449–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramesh P, Devapriya M. An optimized energy efficient route selection algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks based on LOA. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2018;8(2S):298-304

  12. Gupta GP. Improved Cuckoo Search-based Clustering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Procedia Comp Sci. 2018;125:234–240.

  13. Tayeb S. Cluster Head Energy Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks. Software Network. 2018;2016(1):137–162.

  14. Aslam M. Multihopping Multilevel Clustering Heterogeneity-Sensitive Optimized Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. HINDAWI J Sens. 2017.

  15. Saravanan M. A Hybrid Optimized Weighted Minimum Spanning Tree for the Shortest Intrapath Selection in Wireless Sensor Network. HINDAWI, Mathematical Problems Eng. 2014.

  16. Onthachj D. An Optimized QoS-based Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. (IJIES). 2018;11(2).

  17. Jiang S. LEACH Protocol Analysis and Optimization of Wireless Sensor Networks Based on PSO and AC. (IHMSC). 2018;246–250.

  18. Li L. An Energy-Balanced Routing Protocol for a Wireless Sensor Network. HINDAWI J Sens. 2018.

  19. Zhao Z. An Energy-Efficient Clustering Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on AGNES with Balanced Energy Consumption Optimization. (SENSOR, Basel). 2018;18(11).

  20. Kogilavani SV, Harsitha K, Jayapratha P, Mirtthula SG. Heart disease prediction using machine learning techniques. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29.

  21. Tama BA. Improving an Intelligent Detection System for Coronary Heart Disease Using a Two-Tier Classifier Ensemble. Bio Med Res Int. 2020.

  22. Abdejdjouad FZ. A Hybrid Approach for Heart Disease Diagnosis and Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques. Int Conf Smart Homes Health Telematics ICOST. 2020.

  23. Al-Shammari A. An effective density-based clustering and dynamic maintenance framework for evolving medical data streams. Sci Direct Int J Med Inform. 2019;126.

  24. Aldhyani TH. Soft Clustering for Enhancing the Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases over Machine Learning Algorithms. Hindawi, J Healthcare Eng. 2020.

  25. Patibandla RL, Rao BT, Krishna PS, Maddumala VR. Medical data clustering using particle swarm optimization method. J Crit Rev. 2020;7.

  26. Mohan S, Thirumalai C, Srivastava G. Effective Heart Disease Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Techniques. IEEE Access. 2019;7:81542–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li G, Wu J, Li J, Wang K, Ye T. Service Popularity-based Smart Resources Partitioning for Fog Computing-enabled Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Industr Inf. 2018;14(10):4702–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daniels H, Velikova M. Monotone and Partially Monotone Neural Networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks. 2010;21(6):906–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prerana THM, Shivaprakash NC. et al. Prediction of Heart Disease Using Machine Learning Algorithms- Naïve Bayes. Introduction to PAC Algorithm, Comparison of Algorithms and HDPS. 2015;3:90–99. ©IJSE.

  30. Munnangi AK, UdhayaKumar S, Ravi V, et al. Survival study on deep learning techniques for IoT enabled smart healthcare system. Health Technol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00736-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Packiavathy SV, Gautam S et al. Internet of Things (IoT) based automated sanitizer dispenser and COVID-19 statistics reporter in a post-pandemic world. Health Technol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00728-4.

  32. An AI-enabled Internet of things based autism care system for improving cognitive ability of children with autism spectrum disorders. (2022, May 23). Publishing Open Access research journals & papers | Hindawi. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2022/2247675/.

  33. Houssein EH, Ibrahim IE, Hassaballah M, Wazery YM. Integration of Machine Learning and Optimization Techniques for Cardiac Health Recognition. In: Houssein, E.H., Abd Elaziz, M., Oliva, D., Abualigah, L. (eds) Integrating Meta-Heuristics and Machine Learning for Real-World Optimization Problems. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 2022;1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99079-4_6.

  34. Li H, Ota K, Dong M. Learning IoT in edge: deep learning for the internet of things with edge computing. IEEE Network. 2018;32(1).

  35. Satpathy S, Mohan P, Das S, Debbarma S. A new healthcare diagnosis system using an IoT-based fuzzy classifier with FPGA. J Supercomp. 2019;1–13.

  36. Pham TD, et al. Computational Prediction Models for Early Detection of Risk of Cardiovascular Events Using Mass Spectrometry Data. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12(5):636–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar PM, Lokesh S, Varatharajan R, Babu GC, Parthasarathy P. Cloud and IoT based disease prediction and diagnosis system for healthcare using Fuzzy neural classifier. Future Gen Comp Syst. 2018;86:527–534.

  38. Eesa AS, Orman Z. A new clustering method based on the bio‐inspired cuttlefish optimization algorithm. Expert Syst. 2020;37(2):e12478.

  39. Sarmah SS. An Efficient IoT-Based Patient Monitoring and Heart Disease Prediction System Using Deep Learning Modified Neural Network. IEEE Access. 2020;8:135784–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chui KT, Liu RW, Lytras MD, Zhao M. Big data and IoT solution for patient behaviour monitoring. Behav Inform Technol. 2019;1–10.

  41. Jagadeeswari V, Subramaniyaswamy V, Logesh R, Vijayakumar V. A study on medical internet of things and big data in personalized healthcare system. Health information science and systems. 2018;6(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Verma P, Sood SK, Kalra S. CloudcentricIoT based student healthcare monitoring framework. J Ambient Intel Humanized Comp. 2018;9(5):1293–1309.

  43. Cygankiewicz I, Zareba W, Vazquez R, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Valdes M, Almendral J, Cinca J, Caminal P, de Luna AB, Vallverdu M. ‘Heart rate turbulence predicts all-cause mortality and sudden death in congestive heart failure patients.’ Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(8):1095–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Acharya UR, Fujita H, Sudarshan VK, Sree VS, Eugene LW, Ghista DN, San Tan R. An integrated index for detection of sudden cardiac death using discrete wavelet transform and nonlinear features. Knowl Based Syst. 2015;83:149–158.

  45. Lai D, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Su Y, Heyat MB. An Automated Strategy for Early Risk Identification of Sudden Cardiac Death by Using Machine Learning Approach on Measurable Arrhythmic Risk Markers. In IEEE Access. 2019;7:94701–94716.

  46. Hemanth RK. Saranya G.Prediction of cardiovascular diseases in diabetic patients using machine learning techniques. Artif Intel Techniques Adv Computing App. 2020;299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5329-5_28.

  47. Houssein EH, Ibrahim IE, Hassaballah M, Wazery YM. Integration of Machine Learning and Optimization Techniques for Cardiac Health Recognition. In: Houssein, E.H., Abd Elaziz, M., Oliva, D., Abualigah, L. (eds) Integrating Meta-Heuristics and Machine Learning for Real-World Optimization Problems. Stud Computational Intel. 2022;1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99079-4_6.

  48. Safa M, Geetha G, Elakkiya U, Saranya D. Vibrotactile feedbacks system for assisting the physically impaired persons for easy navigation. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1000: 012062.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1000/1/012062.

  49. Saranya G, Pravin A. Feature selection techniques for disease diagnosis system: A survey. Artif Intel Techniques Adv Comp App. 2020;249–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5329-5_24.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The Part time Ph.D - IT/IT Enabled Services (IT/ITES) is supported by Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India initiated “Visvesvaraya PhD Scheme for Electronics and IT”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, India

    M. Safa & A. Pandian

  2. Department of Information Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

    H. L. Gururaj

  3. Center for Artificial Intelligence, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia

    Vinayakumar Ravi

  4. FCSIT, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia

    Moez Krichen

  5. ReDCAD Laboratory, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

    Moez Krichen

Authors
  1. M. Safa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Pandian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. L. Gururaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vinayakumar Ravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moez Krichen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to H. L. Gururaj or Vinayakumar Ravi.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safa, M., Pandian, A., Gururaj, H.L. et al. Real time health care big data analytics model for improved QoS in cardiac disease prediction with IoT devices. Health Technol. 13, 473–483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00747-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00747-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation