Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring the Economic Racial Divide Across the Course of American Lives

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the racial divide in America with respect to three key aspects of economic well-being across the life course: (1) the likelihood of attaining affluence and avoiding poverty; (2) the probability of owning a home and acquiring significant levels of financial equity; and (3) the likelihood of possessing enough assets to protect oneself through a spell of economic turmoil. The Panel Study of Income Dynamics data set is used to construct a series of life tables that provide adulthood estimates into the occurrence of these events. The results indicate that within each area, the economic racial divide across the American life course is immense. Blacks are many times more likely than whites to experience poverty while never achieving affluence, less likely to purchase a home at an early age and build up significant levels of home equity, and more likely to experience asset poverty across the stages of the life course. The concept of cumulative advantage/disadvantage is discussed as a way of understanding the widening effect of race upon the economic trajectories of whites and blacks across the American life course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caner, A., & Wolff, E. N. (2004). Asset poverty in the United States, 1984–99: Evidence from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Review of Income and Wealth, 50, 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, K. K., & Hurst, E. (2002). The transition to home ownership and the black-white wealth gap. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. (2003). The American Dream: A short history of an idea that shaped a nation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, S327–S337.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Hofferth, S. L., & Stafford, F. P. (2004). Evolution and change in family income, wealth, and health: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–2000 and beyond. In J. S. House (Ed.), A telescope on society: Survey research and social science at the University of Michigan and beyond (pp. 156–200). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1995). The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luescher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 101–140). New York: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data—The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 251–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. (1997). Money: Who has how much and why. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., & Wolff, E. N. (2004). The concept and measurement of asset poverty: Levels, trends and composition for the U.S., 1983–2001. Journal of Economic Inequality, 2, 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. S. (1992). The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A user’s guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschl, T. A., & Rank, M. R. (2008). Homeownership across the American life course. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meetings, August 1–4, Boston, Massachusetts.

  • Hochschild, J. L. (1995). Facing up to the American Dream: Race, class and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. D. (2005). The life course perspective: A promising approach for bridging the micro and macro worlds for social workers. Families in Society, 86, 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. (2000). Wealth in America: Trends in wealth inequality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. S., & Stafford, F. P. (2000). The quality of the PSID income data in the 1990s and beyond. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Technical Paper Series, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Massey, D. S. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American social stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. U., & Tuma, N. B. (1990). Life course research and event history analysis: An overview. In K. U. Mayer & N. B. Tuma (Eds.), Event history analysis in life course research (pp. 3–20). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication system of science. Science, 199, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, 606–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, K., & Suchindran, C. M. (1987). Life table techniques and their applications. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel Study of Income Dynamics. (2007). User guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R. (2004). One nation, underprivileged: Why American poverty affects us all. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2001). Rages or riches? Estimating the probabilities of poverty and affluence across the adult American life span. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 651–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2008). Estimating the life course dynamics of asset poverty. Paper presented at the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Conference on Financial Well-Being Over the Life Course, University of Michigan, November 20–21, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Settersten, R. A., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, T. M. (2004). The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2008). Income, poverty and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007. Current Population Reports, Series P60-235. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (2009). More than just race: Being black and poor in the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by a research grant from the Center on Social Development, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, and by a research grant from the Panel Studies of Income Dynamics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Rank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rank, M.R. Measuring the Economic Racial Divide Across the Course of American Lives. Race Soc Probl 1, 57–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-009-9009-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-009-9009-z

Keywords

Navigation