Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of mouth rinses on the hardness of three tooth-colored restorative materials

An in vitro study

  • original article
  • Published:
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine

Abstract

Background

Tooth-colored restorative materials, such as composite resins, glass-ionomer cements or compomers are routinely used for tooth restoration. Alcohol is used in mouth rinses as a solvent, taste enhancer and an antiseptic agent but studies have shown it to be directly related to softening of composite resin restorations.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the hardness of glass-ionomer cement, compomer and composite resin when exposed to six varieties of mouth rinses at intervals of 1 h, 1 day, 7 days and 14 days.

Materials and methods

The tooth-colored restorative materials investigated in this study were ChemFlex (MI), EsthetX (M2) and Dyract (M3). A total of 147 specimens were prepared, 49 from each restorative material. Over a period of 14 days the samples were immersed twice daily for 2 min in 15 ml of the respective mouth rinse. After each immersion, the specimens were washed and stored in artificial saliva. A Vickers hardness number (VHN) was obtained from the readings at 1 h, 1 day, 7 days and 14 days after the first immersion.

Statistical analysis

The average VHN values for each day for all materials were analyzed for significant differences using ANOVA and F-test to investigate the VHN differences between storage time and medium.

Results

Mouth rinses significantly softened the hardness of restorative materials. The properties of composite resin were found to be affected more by the mouth rinses than that of compomer and glass-ionomer cement.

Conclusions

This study showed that the higher the content of alcohol in the mouth rinse the more adverse the effects on the hardness of restoratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavalcanti A, Mitsui FH, Ambrosano GM, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Effect of different mouthrinses on Knoop hardness of a restorative composite. Am J Dent. 2005;18:338–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92:257–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarrett DC, Coletti DP, Peluso AR. The effects of alcoholic beverages on composite wear. Dent Mater. 2000;16:62–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gurgan S, Onen A, Koprulu H. In vitro effects of alcohol-containing and alcohol-free mouth-rinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:244–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Penugonda B, Settembrini L, Schere W, Hittelman E, Strassler H. Alcohol containing mouthwashes: effect on composite hardness. J Clin Dent. 1994;5:60–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig RG. Chemistry, composition and properties of composite resins. Dent Clin North Am. 1981;25:219–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitta K. Effect of light guide tip diameter of LED-light curing unit on polymerization of light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:217–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Diab M, Zaazou MH, Mubarak EH, Olaa MIF. Effect of five commercial mouthrinses on the microhardness and color stability of two resin composite restorative materials. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2007;1:667–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent. 2000;25:113–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anusavice KJ. Mechanical properties of dental materials in Phillips’ science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yap AUJ, Low JS, Ong LF. Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2000;25:170–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferracane JL, Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1418–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiner R, Millstein P, Hoang E, Marshall D. The effect of alcoholic mouthwashes on heat-treated composite resin. Oper Dent. 1997;22:249–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu W, McKinney JE. Influence of chemicals on wear of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1982;61:1180–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McKinney JE, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1985;64:1326–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chadwick RG, McCabe JF, Walls AW, Storer R. The effect of storage media on the surface microhardness and abrasion resistance of three composites. Dent Mater. 1990;6:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yap AU, Tan DT, Goh BK, Kuah HG, Goh M. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the flexural strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2000;25:202–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater. 2001;17:34–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 2001;17:394–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Soderholm KJM, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1692–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effects of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid modified composite resins (“compomer”). Dent Mater. 1999;15:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Basting RT, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. In situ microhardness evaluation of glass-ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials at different post-irradiation times. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:1187–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;76:883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. De Gee AJ, van Duinen RNB, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arweiler NB, Netuschil L, Reich E. Alcohol-free mouthrinse solutions to reduce supragingival plaque regrowth and vitality. A controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28:168–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharti Lamba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamba, B., Ponnappa, K. & Lamba, A. Effect of mouth rinses on the hardness of three tooth-colored restorative materials. J. Stomat. Occ. Med. 5, 64–69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-012-0040-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-012-0040-0

Keywords

Navigation