Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of onset and propagation of damage in the adhesive joining of a dome-separated composite pressure vessel including temperature effects

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) was used to predict the progressive failure behavior of adhesive joining of a domeseparated composite pressure vessel according to variation in the temperatures. A set of cohesive zone parameters for the adhesive material were obtained through Mode I, Mode II, and Mixed Mode I/II interfacial fracture toughness tests. In order to evaluate the effect of temperature on the interfacial fracture toughness, in situ temperature environments were simulated in the range -30 to 60oC, using an environmental chamber and furnace. The double-lap joint test was suggested as a way to verify the proposed CZM and simulation procedure. It was found that good accuracy in the prediction of debonding loads, and the damage onset and growth of adhesive joining, was obtained between the numerical predictions and the experimental results. The results of progressive failure analysis of the adhesive joining of the dome-separated composite pressure vessel showed that the maximum debonded length was predicted to be about 6.0% of the total adhesive length and that the damage onset and propagation behavior of the adhesive joining showed a similar tendency under room and low-temperature environments. However, in the high-temperature environment (60oC), the debonding of the adhesive joining tended to propagate early and quickly compared to the same action under room and low-temperature conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a:

crack length

b:

width of the specimen

c:

lever length

E1f :

modulus of elasticity in the fiber direction measured in flexure

GI :

mode I energy release rate

GII :

mode II energy release rate

GIC :

critical energy release rate for mode I

GIIC :

critical energy release rate for mode II

GC :

sum of GIC and GIIC

GT :

total energy release rate

GII/GT :

mixed mode ratio

h:

half-thickness of specimen

K:

cohesive stiffness

L:

half-span of specimen

N:

interfacial normal tensile strength

P:

load

ri :

radius of random place on the dome

ro :

opening radius

rc :

radius of cylinder

S:

interfacial sliding shear strength

T:

interfacial scissoring shear strength

ti :

thickness of random place on the dome

tc :

thickness of cylinder of composite pressures vessel

ai :

winding angle of random place on the dome

ac :

winding angle of cylinder of composite pressures vessel

δ:

displacement

δf :

cohesive ductility

ti(i=1,2,3):

interfacial normal or shear tractions for pure mode i

tult :

ultimate stress

χ:

crack length correction parameter

References

  1. Kim, J., Shin, K., and Hwang, T., “Progressive Failure Analysis of Adhesive Joints of Filament-Wound Composite Pressure Vessel,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, Vol. 38, No. 11, pp. 1265–1272, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zemcik, R. and Las, V., “Numerical and Experimental Analyses of the Delamination of Cross-Ply Laminates,” Materiali in Tehnologije, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 171–174, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco, N., Turon, A., and Costa, J., “An Exact Solution for the Determination of the Mode Mixture in the Mixed-Mode Bending Delamination Test,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 10, pp. 1256–1258, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozdil, F., Carlsson, L., and Li, X., “Characterization of Mode II Delamination Growth in Glass/Epoxy Composite Cylinders,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 274–298, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarrado, C., Turon, A., Costa, J., and Renart, J., “On the Validity of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics Methods to Measure the Fracture Toughness of Adhesive Joints,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 81, No. pp. 110–116, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burlayenko, V., Altenbach, H., Sadowski, T., and Dimitrova, S., “Computational Simulations of Thermal Shock Cracking by the Virtual Crack Closure Technique in a Functionally Graded Plate,” Computational Materials Science, Vol. 116, pp. 11–21, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z. J., Chen, J. F., and Holt, G. D., “Efficient Evaluation of Stress Intensity Factors Using Virtual Crack Extension Technique,” Computers & Structures, Vol. 79, No. 31, pp. 2705–2715, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pirondi, A. and Nicoletto, G., “Simulation of Fracture in Bonded Joints with a Cohesive Zone Model,” Proc. of the 15th European Conference on Fracture, ECF15, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Camanho, P. P., Davila, C. G., and De Moura, M. F., “Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Mode Progressive Delamination in Composite Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 37, No. 16, pp. 1415–1438, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alfano, G., “On the Influence of the Shape of the Interface Law on the Application of Cohesive-Zone Models,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 6, pp. 723–730, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Moura, M., Gonçalves, J., Chousal, J., and Campilho, R., “Cohesive and Continuum Mixed-Mode Damage Models Applied to the Simulation of the Mechanical Behaviour of Bonded Joints,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 419–426, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cytec Engineered Materials, “FM®73 Epoxy Film Adhesive Technical Data Sheet,” http://www.argosyinternational.com/sites/ default/files/datasheet/FM_73_081111.pdf (Accessed 25 OCT 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ASTM D5528-01, “Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites,” 2001.

  14. ASTM D6671, “Standard Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites” 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pereira, A., De Morais, A., Marques, A., and De Castro, P., “Mode II Interlaminar Fracture of Carbon/Epoxy Multidirectional Laminates,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 10, pp. 1653–1659, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodgkinson, J. M., “Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites,” Elsevier, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borg, R., Nilsson, L., and Simonsson, K., “Simulating DCB, ENF and MMB Experiments Using Shell Elements and a Cohesive Zone Model,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 269–278, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. JIS K 7068, “Testing Methods for Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics,” 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodgkinson, J. M., “Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites,” Elsevier, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM D3528-96, “Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Double Lap Shear Adhesive Joints by Tension Loading,” 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Camanho, P. P., Davila, C. G., and Ambur, D. R., “Numerical Simulation of Delamination Growth in Composite Materials,” NASA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cui, W., Wisnom, M., and Jones, M., “A Comparison of Failure Criteria to Predict Delamination of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Specimens Waisted through the Thickness,” Composites, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 158–166, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perillo, G., Vedvik, N. P., and Echtermeyer, A. T., “Numerical Analyses of Low Velocity Impacts on Composite. Advanced Modelling Techniques,” Proc. of the Simulia Customer Conference, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kenane, M. and Benzeggagh, M. L., “Mixed-Mode Delamination Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites under Fatigue Loading,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 597–605, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Diehl, T., “On Using A Penalty-Based Cohesive-Zone Finite Element Approach, Part I: Elastic Solution Benchmarks,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 237–255, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Im, J., Shin, K., and Hwang, T., “Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Carbon/Epoxy Composites under in Situ Low- and High-Temperature Environments,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 567–573, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeon, K.-W., Shin, K.-B., and Hwang, T.-K., “A Study on the Structural Analysis of Joint Part in Accordance with Adhesive Length of a Composite Rocket Motor Case,” Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 90–96, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work supported by the Agency for Defense Development (ADD) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MOE) (No. 2015R1D1A1A01060 750).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Bok Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Im, JM., Kang, SG., Shin, KB. et al. Prediction of onset and propagation of damage in the adhesive joining of a dome-separated composite pressure vessel including temperature effects. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 18, 1795–1804 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0208-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0208-z

Keywords

Navigation