Abstract
This study aimed to investigate kinetics and kinematics of the ankle joint during level ground, ramp, and stair ambulations using different types of adaptive ankle feet (AAFs), Proprio-FootTM (Össur, IcEland), élan foot (Endolite, USA), and Echelon foot (Endolite, USA). A transtibial amputee was asked to walk on a level ground, a ramp with a 7° slope, and a stair of height 15 cm. The ankle angle and symmetry index (SI) based on the symmetry of the external work performed were measured for AAFs and ambulation. The single support time and stance phase during ambulation were higher for AAFs than the fixed ankle foot. During level ambulation, dorsiflexion increased for all AAFs. During slope ascent ambulation, dorsiflexion increased for the élan foot and Proprio-Foot™, as well as during the swing phase of the Echelon foot. During slope descent ambulation, the maximum dorsiflexion decreased for the Proprio-Foot™. During stair ascent, the élanElan foot and Proprio-Foot™ feet improved the dorsiflexion. During stair descent, all AAFs improved the dorsiflextion. Furthermore, SI increased for most of the adaptive ankle feet for all terrain conditions. These results indicate that AAFs can be used to improve the kinetics and kinematics of the ankle on the involved side.
Abbreviations
- SI:
-
symmetry index
- SEW:
-
symmetry in external work
References
Alimusaj, M., Fradet, L., Braatz, F., Gerner, H. J., and Wolf, S. I., “Kinematics and Kinetics with an Adaptive Ankle Foot System during Stair Ambulation of Transtibial Amputees,” Gait & Posture, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–363, 2009.
Fradet, L., Alimusaj, M., Braatz, F., and Wolf, S. I., “Biomechanical Analysis of Ramp Ambulation of Transtibial Amputees with an Adaptive Ankle Foot System,” Gait & Posture, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 191–198, 2010.
Agrawal, V., Gailey, R. S., Gaunaurd, I. A., O’Toole, C., and Finnieston, A. A., “Comparison between Microprocessor-Controlled Ankle/Foot and Conventional Prosthetic Feet during Stair Negotiation in People with Unilateral Transtibial Amputation,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, Vol. 50, No. 7 pp. 941–950, 2013.
De Asha, A. R., Johnson, L., Munjal, R., Kulkarni, J., and Buckley, J. G., “Attenuation of Centre-of-Pressure Trajectory Fluctuations under the Prosthetic Foot when using an Articulating Hydraulic Ankle Attachment Compared to Fixed Attachment,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 218–224, 2013.
Chang, Y. H., Bae, T. S., Kim, S. K., Kim, S. B., Mun, M. S., and Lee, W. H., “Relationship between Ankle Inversion Angle and Knee Adduction Moment on the Intact Limb in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees during Walking,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 609–615, 2012.
Chang, Y. H., Bae, T. S., Kim, S. K., Mun, M. S., and Lee, W. H., “Intact Hip and Knee Joint Moment in Coronal Plane with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputee,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 129–134, 2011.
Agrawal, V., Gailey, R., O’Toole, C., Gaunaurd, I., and Dowell, T., “Symmetry in External Work (Sew): A Novel Method of Quantifying Gait Differences between Prosthetic Feet,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 148–156, 2009.
Darter, B. J. and Wilken, J. M., “Energetic Consequences of using a Prosthesis with Adaptive Ankle Motion during Slope Walking in Persons with a Transtibial Amputation,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 5–11, 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ko, CY., Kim, SB., Kim, J.K. et al. Comparison of ankle angle adaptations of prosthetic feet with and without adaptive ankle angle during level ground, ramp, and stair ambulations of a transtibial amputee: A pilot study. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 2689–2693 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0645-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0645-x