Skip to main content
Log in

Prognosis-informed wind farm operation and maintenance for concurrent economic and environmental benefits

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advances in high-performance sensing and signal processing technology enable the development of failure-prognosis tools for wind turbines to detect, diagnose, and predict the system wide effects of failure events. Although prognostics can provide valuable information for proactive actions in preventing system failures, the benefits have not been fully utilized for the operation and maintenance decision-making of wind turbines. This paper presents a generic failure prognosis informed decision-making tool for wind farm operation and maintenance while considering the predictive failure information of an individual turbine and its uncertainty. In the presented approach, the probabilistic damage growth model is used to characterize individual wind turbine performance degradation and failure prognostics, whereas the economic loss measured by monetary values and environmental performance measured by unified carbon credits are considered in the decision-making process. Based on customized wind farm information input, the developed decision-making methodology can be used to identify optimum and robust strategies for wind farm operation and maintenance in order to maximize economic and environmental benefits concurrently. The efficacy of the proposed prognosis-informed maintenance strategy is compared with the condition-based maintenance strategy and demonstrated with a wind farm case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

O&M:

operation and maintenance

WT:

wind turbine

CBM:

condition-based maintenance

SBI:

similarity-based interpolation

RUL:

remaining useful life

D :

current damage level

dD/dt:

rate of damage growth

dN/dt:

load cycles acting per hour on WT

C :

damage coefficient

ΔK :

change in damage-intensity factor

m :

damage exponent

β:

geometry factor

H s :

load factor

X s :

proportionality factor

C tot :

total cost

C ins :

total inspection cost

C rep :

total repair cost

C fail :

total failure cost

C trans :

total transportation cost

C CMS :

condition monitoring system installation cost

C prod :

total cost incurred due to production loss

R :

rate of interest

b :

cost per KWH

n days :

number of days required to perform repair

n KWH :

number of units of power produced

CC :

carbon credits

d :

total number of downtime hours

p :

loss of power production per hour in KWH

e :

CO2 emissions in tons per KWH generated by coal power plant

W j :

inverse of the sum of squared error

D j b(t i):

jth damage-growth path data

PoD :

probability of detection of damage

P 0 :

maximum probability of detection

λ :

expected value of smallest detectable damage

References

  1. Byon, E., Ntaimo, L., and Ding, Y., “Optimal Maintenance Strategies for Wind Turbine Systems under Stochastic Weather Conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 393–404, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pacca, S. and Horvath, A., “Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building and Operating Electric Power Plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin,” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, No. 14, pp. 3194–3200, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, P., Youn, B. D., and Hu, C., “A Probabilistic Detectability-Based Structural Sensor Network Design Methodology for Prognostics and Health Management,” Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, P., Youn, B. D., and Hu, C., “A generic sensor network design framework based on a probabilistic detectability measure,” Proc. of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1013–1022, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, J. and Sorensen, J., “On Risk-Based Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbine Components,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 218–229, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nilsson, J. and Bertling, L., “Maintenance Management of Wind Power Systems Using Condition Monitoring Systems-Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Two Case Studies,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 223–229, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byon, E., Perez, E., Ntaimo, L., and Ding, Y., “Simulation of Wind Farm Operations and Maintenance Using DEVS,” Simulation, Vol. 87, No. 12, pp. 1093–1117, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Natarajan, B., Lee, J., Lim, J., and Shin, S. J., “Structural analysis of composite wind turbine blade using advanced beam model approach,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 2245–2250, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, B.-Y., Han, J.-Y., Hong, C.-H., and Moon, B.-Y., “Dynamic analysis of hybrid wind power composite blades according to stacking properties method,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1161–1166, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu, D. K., Lee, K.-S., Park, J.-W., Woo, Y.-D., and Im, K.-H., “NDE inspection of terahertz waves in wind turbine composites,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1183–1189, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi, W., Wang, F., Zhuo, Y., and Liu, Y., “Research on Operation Condition Classification Method for Vibration Monitoring of Wind Turbine,” Proc. of Power and Energy Engineering Conference APPEEC, pp. 1–6, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, W. and Chu, F., “Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnostics of Wind Turbines,” Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Prognostics and Health Management Conference, pp. 1–11, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, W., Tavner, P., and Wilkinson, M., “Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Using Both Mechanical and Electrical Signatures,” Proc. of the 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 1296–1301, 2008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Bang, H.-J., Kim, H., and Lee, K.-S., “Measurement of strain and bending deflection of a wind turbine tower using arrayed FBG sensors,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 2121–2126, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, C., Kim, K., Kim, H., Paek, I., Yoo, N., Nam, Y., Campagnolo, F., and Bottasso, C., “A method to estimate bending moments acting on a wind turbine blade specimen using FBG sensors,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1247–1250, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, W., Tavner, P., Crabtree, C., and Wilkinson, M., “Cost Effective Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbines,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 263–271, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hapke, H., Haapala, K. R., Wu, Z., and Brekken, T. K. A., “Life Cycle Assessment of Modern Wind Power Plants,” Proc. ASME IDETC/CIE: 15th Design for Manufacturing and the Lifecycle Conference, Paper No. DETC2010-28749, pp. 395–403, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jimenez, E., and Blanco, J., “Life Cycle Assessment of a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 667–673, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schleisner, L., “Life Cycle Assessment of a Wind Farm and Related Externalities,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 279–288, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenzen, M. and Munksgaard, J., “Energy and CO2 Life-Cycle Analyses of Wind Turbines-Review and Applications,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 339–362, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crawford, R. H., “Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Emissions Analysis of Wind Turbines and the Effect of Size on Energy Yield,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 2653–2660, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Overcash, M., Twomey, J., and Isaacs, J., “Manufacturing Unit Process Life Cycle Inventories (Uplci),” Proc. of the 9th PerMIS, pp. 30–31, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, C., Youn, B. D., and Wang, P., “Ensemble of Data-Driven Prognostic Algorithms for Robust Prediction of Remaining Useful Life,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 103, pp. 120–135, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oppenheimer, C. H. and Loparo, K. A., “Physically Based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cracked Rotor Shafts,” Proc. of SPIE: Component and Systems Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Health Management II, Vol. 4733, pp. 122–132, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, P., Youn, B. D., and Hu, C., “A Generic Probabilistic Framework for Structural Health Prognostics and Uncertainty Management,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 28, pp. 622–637, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sorensen, J., “Framework for Risk-Based Planning of Operation and Maintenance for Offshore Wind Turbines,” Wind Energy, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 493–506, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnwell, G., “Your Contribution to Global Warming,” National Wildlife, Vol. 28, No. 2, p. 53, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pingfeng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, P., Tamilselvan, P., Twomey, J. et al. Prognosis-informed wind farm operation and maintenance for concurrent economic and environmental benefits. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 14, 1049–1056 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0141-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0141-8

Keywords

Navigation