Skip to main content
Log in

Current and frequency modulation for the characterization of electrically-elicited tactile sensations

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was aimed to characterize and investigate the feasibility of the electrically-elicited sensation as a sensory feedback technique. Two experiments were performed using a monophasic rectangular pulse train of which either the current or the frequency was modulated. The activation and pain thresholds, the discrimination ability and the description of the sensations were defined, measured and analyzed for ten healthy subjects. Diverse thresholds were acquired due to the individual differences in perceptual functioning, implying the technique should be intended for personalized systems. The discrimination ability was represented with a linear regression model providing the discrimination ability value that showed how much we have to change the parameter of interest in order to elicit a different sensation. 80% of the cases were well-represented by the linear regression models. The remaining 20% were better approximated by a curve, coinciding with the lowest discrimination ability values calculated for each experiment. The discrimination ability results provided an insight into the amount of information that can be transmitted to the body by our stimulation. The tactile sensations were reported as well-defined, describable and localizable. Our results supported the usability of electro-tactile stimulation as a non-invasive and easily-employable technique for the sensory feedback system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAT:

Discrimination Ability Test

AT:

Activation Threshold

PT:

Pain Threshold

CAT:

Current Activation Threshold

FAT:

Frequency Activation Threshold

CPT:

Current Pain Threshold

FPT:

Frequency Pain Threshold

CIMP:

Current Interval Middle Point

References

  1. Biddiss, E., Beaton, D., and Chau, T., “Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 346–357, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cipriani, C., Zaccone, F., Micera, S., and Chiara, M., “On the shared control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand: analysis of userprosthesis interaction,” IEEE Trans. Robotics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 170–184, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chouvardas, V., Miliou, A., and Hatalis, M., “Tactile displays: Overview and recent advances,” Displays, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 185–194, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Konyo, M., Tadokoro, S., Yoshida, A., and Saiwaki, N., “A tactile synthesis method using multiple frequency vibrations for representing virtual touch,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Int. Rob. Sys., pp. 3965–3971, 2005.

  5. Marcus, P. and Fuglevand, A., “Perception of electrical and mechanical stimulation of the skin: implications for electrotactile feedback,” J. of Neural Eng., Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1–12, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Szeto, A. and Saunders, F., “Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 300–308, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., and Tachi, S., “Electro-tactile display with tactile primary color approach,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Int. Rob. Sys., 2004.

  8. Sahin, M. and Tie, Y., “Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes,” J. of Neural Eng., Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 227–233, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Field-Fote, E. C., Anderson, B., Robetson, V. J., and Sprelholz, N. I., “Monophasic and biphasic stimulation evoke different responses,” Muscle & Nerve, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 239–241, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubinstein, J. T., Miller, C. A., Mino, H., and Abbas, P. J., “Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation of nerve,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1065–1070, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grill, W. M. and Mortimer, J. T., “Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 375–385, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundstrom, R. J., “Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to vibration,” Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 413–416, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ara, J., Hwang, S. H., Song, T., and Khang, G., “Electrically-elicited tactile sensation for different modulation types, polarities and waveforms of stimulation pulse trains,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1911–1916, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gon Khang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cordon, S.M.G., Hwang, S.H., Song, T. et al. Current and frequency modulation for the characterization of electrically-elicited tactile sensations. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13, 2051–2058 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0270-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0270-5

Keywords

Navigation