Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adhesion characteristics of the snail foot under various surface conditions

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there have been many studies on the adhesion mechanisms of various mollusca such as snails, clams and octopi. Understanding their magnitude and working force is advantageous for application in specially designed robotic systems. The adhesion mechanism in these animals is effectively generated by a complex biological system that is able to operate under various surface conditions. In this work, fundamental research was conducted to understand the adhesion mechanism of living snails. Pull-off and lateral forces were measured while the snail was adhered to various surfaces in order to investigate the effects of surface conditions such as surface energy, surface roughness and surface type on the adhesion or suction of the snail. In order to understand the relationship between suction and adhesion of the snail, pull-off and suction forces were simultaneously measured using a custom-built apparatus. The average adhesion and suction force was estimated to be 0.2 kgf and 0.44 kgf, respectively. It was found that the snail effectively used both capillary adhesion and suction mechanisms to attach to and move on the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoseph, B. C., “Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies,” CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

  2. Menon, C. and Sitti, M., “A Biomimetic Climbing Robot Based on the Gecko,” J. of Bionic Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 115–125, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Denny, M. W. and Gosline, J. M., “The Physical Properties of the Pedal Mucus of the Terrestrial Slug, Ariolimax columbianus,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol. 88, pp. 375–393, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, K. T., Choi, J. H., Park, H. J. and Lim, S. C., “Antioxidative Activity of the Mucin obtained from Achatina fulica and Its Commercially-Additive Preparation,” Bulletin Kyung Hee Pharmacy Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 89–94, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, A. M., Quick, T. J. and Peter, R. L., “Differences in the Composition of Adhesive and Non-adhesion Mucus from the Limpet Lottia limatula,” Biological Bulletin, Vol. 196, No. 1, pp. 34–44, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlova, G. A., “Effects of Serotonin, Dopamine and Ergometrine on Locomotion in the Pulmonate Mollusc Helix Lucorum,” J. Experimental Biology, Vol. 204, No. 9, pp. 1625–1633, 2001.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, A. M. and Morin, M. C., “Biochemical Differences between Trail Mucus and Adhesive Mucus from Marsh Periwinkle Snails,” Biological Bulletin, Vol. 203, No. 3, pp. 338–346, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, J. S., Sung, I. H., Kim, Y. T., Kwon, E. Y., Kim, D. E. and Jang, Y. H., “Experimental investigation of frictional and viscoelastic properties of intestine for microendoscope application,” Tribology Letters, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 143–149, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J. S., Sung, I. H., Kim, Y. T., Kim, D. E. and Jang, Y. H., “Analytical model development for the prediction of the frictional resistance of a capsule endoscope inside an intestine,” J. Engineering in Medicine, Vol. 221, No. 8, pp. 837–845, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scherge, M. and Gorb, S. N., “Biological Micro-and Nanotribology,” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 107–110, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aono, K., Fusada, A., Fusada, Y., Ishii, W., Kanaya, Y., Komuro, M., Matsui, K., Meguro, S., Miyamae, A., Miyamae, Y., Murata, A., Narita, S., Nozaka, H., Saito, W., Watanabe, A., Nishikata, K., Kanazawa, A., Fujito, Y., Yamagish, M., Abe, T., Nagayama, M., Uchida, T., Gohara, K., Lukowiak, K. and Ito, E., “Upside-Down Gliding of Lymnaea,” Biol. Bull., Vol. 215, No. 3, pp. 272–279, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dodou, D., Girard, D., Breedveld, P. and Wieringa, P. A., “Mucoadhesives in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Revisiting the Literature for Novel Applications,” European J. of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1–16, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan, B., Balmforth, N. J. and Hosoi, A. E., “Building a Better Snail: Lubrication and Adhesive Locomotion,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 17, No. 11, Paper No. 113101, 2005.

  14. Shi, Y., Yu, Z., Kong, L. and Hsu, H. Y., “The Locomotion Systems for Self-propelled Endoscope: A Review and A New Proposal,” Proceedings of the 5th IASTED International Conference, pp. 287–292, 2007.

  15. Dodou, D., Girard, D., Breedveld, P. and Wieringa, P. A., “Intestinal Locomotion by Means of Mucoadhesive Films,” Proceeding of International Conference on Advanced Robotics ICAR’05, pp. 352–359, 2005.

  16. Gladun, D. and Gorb, S. N., “Insect walking techniques on thin stems,” Arthropod-Plant Interactions, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 77–91, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, A. M., “The Role of Suction in the Adhesion of Limpet,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol. 161, No. 1, pp. 151–169, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, A. M., “Negative Pressure Generated by Octopus Sukers: a Study of the Tensile Strength of Water in Nature,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol. 157, pp. 257–271, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kier, W. M. and Smith, A. M., “The Structure and Adhesive Mechanism of Octopus Sukers,” Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1146–1153, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, H., Kim, D., Yang, H., Lee, K., Seo, K., Chang, D. and Kim, J., “Development of a wall-climbing robot using a tracked wheel mechanism,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 1490–1498, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson, B. N. J., “Wet Adhesion with Application to Tree Frog Adhesive Toe Pads and Tires,” J. of Physics: Condensed Matter Vol. 19, No. 37, Paper No. 376110, 2007.

  22. Filippov, A. E. and Popov, V., “To Optimal Elasticity of Adhesives Mimicking Gecko Foot-hairs,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 358, No. 4, pp. 309–312, 2006.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Silverman, H. G. and Roberto, F. F., “Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion,” Marine Biotechnology, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 661–681, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, A. M., Robinson, T. M., Salt, M. D., Hamilton, K. S., Silvia, B. E. and Blasiak, R., “Robust Cross-links in Molluscan Adhesive Gels: Testing for Contributions from Hydrophobic and Electrostatic Interactions,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 152, No. 2, pp. 110–117, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farahnak, A. and Dabagh, N., “Adhesion of Cercaria (Larva of Helminth Parasites) to Host by Lectins-carbohydrates bonds as a Model for Evaluation of Schistosoma Entrance Mechanisms in Cercarial Dermatitis,” Iranian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 59–63, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea, 120-749

    Kwang-Il Kim, Young-Tae Kim & Dae-Eun Kim

Authors
  1. Kwang-Il Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Young-Tae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dae-Eun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae-Eun Kim.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, KI., Kim, YT. & Kim, DE. Adhesion characteristics of the snail foot under various surface conditions. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 11, 623–628 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-010-0073-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-010-0073-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation