Skip to main content
Log in

Intervention Format and Delivery Preferences Among Young Adult Cancer Survivors

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Young adult cancer survivors face a number of increased medical and psychosocial risks, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and emotional distress. Although behavioral strategies, such as exercise, may diminish some of these risks, few behavioral interventions have been developed for this population.

Purpose

As a first step toward developing interventions specifically for young survivors, we conducted a qualitative study of their intervention-related preferences. A key objective was to identify the preferred format for delivering interventions (e.g., face-to-face, online).

Method

In-depth, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 20 young adult cancer survivors between the ages of 18 and 39. This research was conducted in Rhode Island, USA.

Results

Participants identified advantages and disadvantages to a variety of intervention formats including: telephone-based, print-based, computer-based, and several types of face-to-face interventions. The dominant theme that emerged was that interventions developed for young adult cancer survivors should take into account their multiple competing needs and obligations (e.g., work, family). Two closely related subthemes were: (1) the importance of developing interventions that are convenient and (2) the need for interventions that provide social support. Interventions for this population may be most successful if they take into account these themes.

Conclusion

Data indicate that young adult cancer survivors have some unique needs (e.g., multiple competing demands of young adulthood) and preferences (e.g., comfort with remotely delivered interventions) that differentiate them from older cancer survivors. Thus, young survivors would be best served by interventions designed to specifically target this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. Closing the gap: research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Livestrong Young Adult Alliance; 2006. Report No.: 06-6067.

  2. Ulman Cancer Fund for Young Adults. Young Adults & Cancer. http://www.ulmanfund.org/Get-Informed/Young-Adults-Cancer.aspx (2012). Accessed 20 January 2012.

  3. Huddart RA, Norman A, Shahidi M, Horwich A, Coward D, Nicholls J, et al. Cardiovascular disease as a long-term complication of treatment for testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1513–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, Cunningham D, Hancock BW, Horwich A, et al. Myocardial infarction mortality risk after treatment for Hodgkin disease: a collaborative British cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(3):206–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Nuver J, de Wit R, Gietema JA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Rodrigus PT, et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Travis LB, Hill D, Dores GM, Gospodarowicz M, van Leeuwen FE, Holowaty E, et al. Cumulative absolute breast cancer risk for young women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(19):1428–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Travis LB, Fossa SD, Schonfeld SJ, McMaster ML, Lynch CF, Storm H, et al. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(18):1354–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burgess C, Cornelius V, Love S, Graham J, Richards M, Ramirez A. Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five-year observational cohort study. Br Med J. 2005;330:702. doi:10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.D3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantrell MA, Conte TM. Between being cured and being healed: the paradox of childhood cancer survivorship. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(3):312–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt M, Rowland JH. Mental health service use among adult cancer survivors: analyses of the National Health Interview Survey. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(23):4581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C, Cohen L. Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology. 2003;12(2):183–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13(5):295–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wenzel L, DeAlba I, Habbal R, Kluhsman BC, Fairclough D, Krebs LU, et al. Quality of life in long-term cervical cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(2):310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield DM, Walters SJ, Coleman RE, Hancock BW, Eastell R, Davies HA, et al. Prevalence and consequences of androgen deficiency in young male cancer survivors in a controlled cross-sectional study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(9):3476–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thewes B, Butow P, Girgis A, Pendlebury S. The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; a qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13(3):177–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1867–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Panagiotakos DB, Rallidis LS, Pitsavos C, Stefanadis C, Kremastinos D. Cigarette smoking and myocardial infarction in young men and women: a case-control study. Int J Cardiol. 2007;116(3):371–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Borges GL, Graham K, Irving H, Kehoe T, et al. The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2010;105(5):817–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thune I, Brenn T, Lund E, Gaard M. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(18):1269–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. United States Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.

  21. Courneya KS. Exercise in cancer survivors: an overview of research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(11):1846–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Galvao DA, Newton RU. Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):899–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Knols R, Aaronson NK, Uebelhart D, Fransen J, Aufdemkampe G. Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16):3830–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coups EJ, Ostroff JS. A population-based estimate of the prevalence of behavioral risk factors among adult cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Prev Med. 2005;40(6):702–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinto B. Behavioral and psychosocial program needs of young adult cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):796–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuhn KG, Boesen E, Ross L, Johansen C. Evaluation and outcome of behavioural changes in the rehabilitation of cancer patients: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(2):216–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinto BM, Maruyama NC. Exercise in the rehabilitation of breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8(3):191–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Blaauwbroek R, Bouma MJ, Tuinier W, Groenier KH, de Greef MH, Meyboom-de Jong B, et al. The effect of exercise counseling with feedback from a pedometer on fatigue in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer 2008.

  29. Emmons KM, Puleo E, Park E, Gritz ER, Butterfield RM, Weeks JC, et al. Peer-delivered smoking counseling for childhood cancer survivors increases rate of cessation: the partnership for health study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schneider S, Moyer A, Knapp-Oliver S, Sohl S, Cannella D, Targhetta V. Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Journal of behavioral medicine. 2010;33(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinto B. Behavioral and psychosocial program needs of young adult cancer survivors. Qualitative health research. 2011;21(6):796–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Courneya KS, Sellar CM, Stevinson C, McNeely ML, Friedenreich CM, Peddle CJ, et al. Moderator effects in a randomized controlled trial of exercise training in lymphoma patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(10):2600–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Daley AJ, Crank H, Mutrie N, Saxton JM, Coleman R. Determinants of adherence to exercise in women treated for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(5):392–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal. 2000;320(7227):114–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jones LW, Courneya KS. Exercise counseling and programming preferences of cancer survivors. Cancer Pract. 2002;10(4):208–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rabin C, Politi M. Need for health behavior interventions for young adult cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(1):70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Santacroce SJ, Lee YL. Uncertainty, posttraumatic stress, and health behavior in young adult childhood cancer survivors. Nurs Res. 2006;55(4):259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu X, Groves FD, McLaughlin CC, Jemal A, Martin J, Chen VW. Cancer incidence patterns among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(3):309–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funds for this research were provided by the Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine at Miriam Hospital and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, RI, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Rabin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabin, C., Simpson, N., Morrow, K. et al. Intervention Format and Delivery Preferences Among Young Adult Cancer Survivors. Int.J. Behav. Med. 20, 304–310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9227-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9227-4

Keywords

Navigation