Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotion, Stress, and Cardiovascular Response: An Experimental Test of Models of Positive and Negative Affect

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The nature of the relationship between positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) has been a topic of debate for some time. In particular, there are gaps in our knowledge of the independent effects of PA and NA on health under stress.

Purpose

The study examined the effects of a laboratory-induced stressor on the experience of PA and NA, and the effects of affect on cardiovascular (CV) reactivity and recovery.

Method

A sample of 56 female college students was randomly assigned to a public speaking (stress) task or a silent reading (control) task. Pre- and posttask PA and NA were measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS Watson J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1,063-1,070, 1988). Baseline, task, and posttask cardiovascular measures were also recorded.

Results

The results indicated that PA and NA responded differently to the stressor and contributed independently to the prediction of both CV reactivity and recovery. Of particular interest was the finding that higher levels of both PA and NA predicted greater CV recovery.

Conclusion

Results are discussed in light of the debate concerning the (in)dependence of positive and negative emotions and the importance of understanding the dynamics of emotions, stress, and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell JA, Carroll JM. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:611–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson D, Clark LA. Towards a consensual structure of mood. Psychol Bull. 1985;98:219–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaillant GE. Aging well: surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study of adult development. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 2002.

  4. Fredrickson BL, Levenson RW. Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae of negative emotions. Cogn Emot. 1998;12:191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zautra AJ. Emotions, stress and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Lepore SJ, Matthews KA, Kamarack TW, Marsland AL. Negative emotions and acute physiological responses to stress. Annals Behav Med. 1999;21:216–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maier KJ, Waldstein SR, Synowski SJ. Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task management. Annals Behav Med. 2003;26:32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Davis M. Dimensions of the affect relationship: models and their implications. Rev Gen Psychol. 2003;7:66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stroud LR, Niagura RS, Stoney CM. Sex differences in cardiovascular reactivity to physical appearance and performance challenges. Int J Behav Med. 2001;8:240–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Speilberger CD, Gorsuch DL, Lushene RE. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James JE, Gregg ME. Hemodynamic effects of dietary caffeine, sleep restriction, and laboratory stress. Psychophysiology. 2004;41(6):914–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes JW, Stoney CM. Depressed mood is related to high-frequency heart-rate variability during stressors. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:796–803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blascovich J, Tomaka J. The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1996;28:1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregg ME, Matyas TA, James JE. A new model of individual differences in hemodynamic profile and blood pressure reactivity. Psychophysiology. 2002;39(1):64–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chow SM, Ram N, Boker SM, Fujita F, Clore G. Emotion as a thermostat: representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model. Emotion. 2005;5(2):208–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fredrickson BL, Losada MF. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. Am Psychol. 2005;60:678–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, NUI, Galway, Ireland

    Haulie Dowd & Michael Hogan

  2. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Alex Zautra

Authors
  1. Haulie Dowd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex Zautra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowd, H., Zautra, A. & Hogan, M. Emotion, Stress, and Cardiovascular Response: An Experimental Test of Models of Positive and Negative Affect. Int.J. Behav. Med. 17, 189–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9063-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9063-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation