Abstract
The estimation of biological sex is a primary source of information regarding unidentified skeletal individuals in bioarcheological and forensic contexts. This study aims to propose new metric standards for the estimation of sex using variables of the calcaneus and talus. An ancillary goal encompasses the creation of a web-based decision support system for the assessment of sex. Six measurements from the talus and nine from the calcaneus were collected from 180 adult individuals (93 females; 87 males) belonging to the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), and a decision-tree algorithm were employed to develop models for sex prediction. Univariable sectioning points generated with a decision-tree algorithm yielded an accuracy under cross-validation from 78.3 to 82.2% with talar measurements, and from 73.6 to 86.4% with calcanei variables. Systematic error ranged from 0.2 to 34.1%. Univariable and multivariable models, produced with LR and SVM, correctly predicted sex in 85.0–91.3% of cases (bias from 0.3 to 4.3%). Obtained cross-validated accuracies obtained with the new models are similar to earlier results on the subject. The performance of multivariable model predictive is substantially superior, hinting the relevance of population-specific standards for sex estimation. The operationalization of these models in a free, user-friendly, web-application—CalcTalus (http://osteomics.com/CalcTalus/)—facilitates the probabilistic assessment of sex, providing performance metrics for the statistical templates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available for other researchers upon reasonable request.
References
Alonso-Llamazares C, Pablos A (2019) Sex estimation from the calcaneus and talus using discriminant function analysis and its possible application in fossil remains. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 11:4927–4946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00855-y
Bartholdy BP, Sandoval E, Hoogland MLP, Schrader SA (2020) Getting rid of dichotomous sex estimations: why logistic regression should be preferred over discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Sci 65:1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14482
Bethard JD, VanSickle C (2020) Applications of sex estimation in paleoanthropology, bioarchaeology, and forensic anthropology. In: Klales A (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, London, pp 25–34
Bidmos MA, Dayal MR (2003) Sex determination from the talus of South African whites by discriminant function analysis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 24:322–328. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.paf.0000098507.78553.4a
Bidmos MA, Dayal MR (2004) Further evidence to show population specificity of discriminant function equations for sex determination using the talus of South African blacks. J Forensic Sci 49:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2003431
Boldsen JL, Milner GR, Boldsen SK (2015) Brief communication: sex estimation from modern American humeri and femora, accounting for sample variance structure. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22812
Bouckaert RR, Frank E, Hall M, et al (2015) WEKA manual for version 3-6-13
Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B, Murail P, Cunha E (2017) Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 164:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282
Chang W, Cheng J, Allaire JJ, et al (2021) shiny: web application framework for R
Cunha E, Wasterlain S (2007) The Coimbra identified osteological collections. In: Grupe G, Peters J (eds) Skeletal series in their socioeconomic context. M. Leidorf, Rahden/Westf., pp 23–33
Curate F, d’Oliveira Coelho J, Gonçalves D et al (2016) A method for sex estimation using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int 266:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.011
Curate F, Umbelino C, Perinha A, Nogueira C, Silva AM, Cunha E (2017) Sex determination from the femur in Portuguese populations with classical and machine-learning classifiers. J Forensic Legal Med 52:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.011
Curate F, Mestre F, Garcia SJ (2021) Sex assessment with the radius in Portuguese skeletal populations (late 19th – early to mid 20th centuries). Legal Med 48:101790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101790
d’Oliveira Coelho J, Curate F (2019) CADOES: an interactive machine-learning approach for sex estimation with the pelvis. Forensic Sci Int 302:109873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109873
d’Oliveira Coelho J, Curate F, Navega D (2020) Osteomics : decision support systems for forensic anthropologists. In: Obertová Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (eds) Statistics and probability in forensic anthropology. Academic Press, London, pp 259–273
DiMichele DL, Spradley MK (2012) Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus. Forensic Sci Int 221:152.e1–152.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.026
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Marks MK (2014) Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med 128:861–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-0999-8
Gillet C, Costa-Mendes L, Rérolle C, Telmon N, Maret D, Savall F (2020) Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods. Int J Legal Med 134:823–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02203-0
Gonçalves D, d’Oliveira Coelho J, Acosta MA et al (2016) One for all and all for one: linear regression from the mass of individual bones to assess human skeletal mass completeness. Am J Phys Anthropol 160:427–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22979
Gualdi-Russo E (2007) Sex determination from the talus and calcaneus measurements. Forensic Sci Int 171:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.10.014
Harris SM, Case DT (2012) Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: implications for sex determination. J Forensic Sci 57:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02004.x
Inskip S, Constantinescu M, Brinkman A, Hoogland M, Sofaer J (2018) The effect of population variation on the accuracy of sex estimates derived from basal occipital discriminant functions. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0380-6
İscan MY, Steyn M (2013) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL
Kazzazi SM, Kranioti EF (2018) Sex estimation using cervical dental measurements in an archaeological population from Iran. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10:439–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0363-7
Klales AR, Ousley SD, Passalacqua NV (2020) Statistical approaches to sex estimation. In: Klales AR (ed) Sex estimation of the human skeleton. Academic Press, London, pp 203–217
Kline RB (2016) Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. Guilford Press, New York
Kotěrová A, Navega D, Štepanovský M, Buk Z, Brůžek J, Cunha E (2018) Age estimation of adult human remains from hip bones using advanced methods. Forensic Sci Int 287:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.047
Kuhn M (2008) Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 28:1–26
Larose D, Larose C (2015) Data mining and predictive analytics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
Larose CD, Larose DT (2019) Data science using Python and R. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ
Lee UY, Han SH, Park DK, Kim YS, Kim DI, Chung IH, Chun MH (2012) Sex determination from the talus of Koreans by discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Sci 57:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01914.x
Lescure J, Ardevines C, Becerra P, Marrodán MD (2020) New random generalized linear model for sex determination based on cranial measurements. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 12:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01145-8
Lynch J, Stephan C (2018) Computational tools in forensic anthropology: the value of open-source licensing as a standard. Forensic Anthropol 1:228–243. https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2018.0025
Mahakkanukrauh P, Praneatpolgrang S, Ruengdit S et al (2014) Sex estimation from the talus in a Thai population. Forensic Sci Int 240:152.e1–152.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.001
Manolis SK, Eliopoulos C, Koilias CG, Fox SC (2009) Sex determination using metacarpal biometric data from the Athens Collection. Forensic Sci Int 193:130.e1–130.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.015
Mays S (1998) The archaeology of human bones. Routledge, London
Moore MK, DiGangi EA, Niño Ruíz FP et al (2016) Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population. Forensic Sci Int 262:286.e1–286.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.018
Murphy AMC (2002) The calcaneus: sex assessment of prehistoric New Zealand Polynesian skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 129:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00301-8
Navega D, Vicente R, Vieira DN, Ross AH, Cunha E (2015) Sex estimation from the tarsal bones in a Portuguese sample: a machine learning approach. Int J Legal Med 129:651–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1070-5
Nikita E, Lahr MM (2011) Simple algorithms for the estimation of the initial number of individuals in commingled skeletal remains. Am J Phys Anthropol 146:629–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21624
Nikita E, Michopoulou E (2018) A quantitative approach for sex estimation based on cranial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 165:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23376
Nikita E, Nikitas P (2020) Data mining and decision trees. In: Obertová Z, Stewart A, Cattaneo C (eds) Statistics and probability in forensic anthropology. Academic Press, London, pp 87–105
Ousley SD, Hollinger RE (2012) The pervasiveness of Daubert. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Chichester, pp 654–665
Peckmann TR, Orr K, Meek S, Manolis SK (2015) Sex determination from the talus in a contemporary Greek population using discriminant function analysis. J Forensic Legal Med 33:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.03.011
Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA
R Core Team (2021) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. 2:https://www.R-project.org
Ricklan DE, Tobias PV (1986) Unusually low sexual dimorphism of endocranial capacity in a Zulu cranial series. Am J Phys Anthropol 71:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330710304
Robinson C, Eisma R, Morgan B, Jeffery A, Graham EAM, Black S, Rutty GN (2008) Anthropological measurement of lower limb and foot bones using multi-detector computed tomography. J Forensic Sci 53:1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00875.x
Santos F (2021) rdss: an R package to facilitate the use of Murail et al.’s (1999) approach of sex estimation in past populations. Int J Osteoarchaeol. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2957
Santos F, Guyomarc’h P, Rmoutilova R, Bruzek J (2019) A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek’s nonmetric traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 169:435–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23855
Saul JM, Saul F (2005) “The game is afoot”: feet help solve forensic puzzles in the United States and overseas. In: Rich J, Dean DE, Powers RH (eds) Forensic medicine of the lower extremity : human identification and trauma analysis of the thigh, leg, and foot. Human Press, Tottowa, pp 359–374
Silva AM (1995) Sex assessment using the calcaneus and talus. Antropol Port 13:107–119
Sorrentino R, Belcastro MG, Figus C, Stephens NB, Turley K, Harcourt-Smith W, Ryan TM, Benazzi S (2020) Exploring sexual dimorphism of the modern human talus through geometric morphometric methods. PLoS One 15:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229255
Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
Steele DG (1976) The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneus. Am J Phys Anthropol 45:581–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330450323
Tuller H, Durić M (2006) Keeping the pieces together: comparison of mass grave excavation methodology. Forensic Sci Int 156:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.033
Ubelaker DH, DeGaglia CM (2017) Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Sci Int 278:407.e1–407.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.012
Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JR et al (2008) Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl Inf Syst 14:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2
Martin R (1928) Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellung mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung der anthropologischen Methoden für Studierende, Artze und Forschungsreisende, Kraniologie, Osteologie, vol. 2. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Code availability
Code generated during this study is available for other researchers upon reasonable request.
Funding
The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) is the funding body of the Research Centre for Anthropology and Health (UIDB/00283/2020). FCT also funds João d’Oliveira Coelho through a Ph.D. grant (SFRH/BD/122306/2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors state that they do not have any conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 13 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Curate, F., d’Oliveira Coelho, J. & Silva, A.M. CalcTalus: an online decision support system for the estimation of sex with the calcaneus and talus. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 13, 74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01327-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01327-y