Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

4-dimensional recording and visualization of urban archeological excavations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new geomatic techniques and technologies for surveying an archeological excavation are not limited to obtaining more accurate data or more precisely geo-referenced positions on a map, as they can lead to new approaches and, indeed, raise the concept of different dimensions relating to the handled information. The techniques on offer are now fully 3D and, even more interestingly, can also permit to handle temporal information, that is, the evolution of operations over time. This allows scholars and technicians to build and maintain a wealth of vital knowledge documenting what happens during an excavation. This is further true when these are in urban areas, often known as “emergency excavations” from their distinctive logistics and timing constraints. The aim of this paper is to present, in a practical context, some of the many capabilities of 3D surveying performed through digital photogrammetry based on multi-view structure-from-motion approach in the field of urban emergency archeology. The information that can be derived from exploring three-dimensional models allows us to interact with realities that no longer exist, with the possibility not merely of recording their memory, but also of further studies and insights, even after a long period of time. In addition, the excavation itself is documented as it evolves, thus allowing the main phases of the process to be reconstructed retrospectively. The study case examined covers a small necropolis discovered in Rimini (Italy) in 2015. The results and the 3D final products can be managed through Geographic Information System (GIS) tools and, therefore, can easily be interfaced and integrated with other types of information on a different scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bitelli G, Girelli VA, Remondino F, Vittuari L (2007) The potential of 3D techniques for cultural heritage object documentation. Proceedings of Videometrics IX - SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, 6491, pp. 64910S1 - 64910S10.

  • Bitelli G, Balletti C, Brumana R, Barazzetti L, D’Urso MG, Rinaudo F, Tucci G (2017) Metric Documentation of Cultural Heritage: Research Directions from the Italian GAMHer Project. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2/W5:83–90. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLII-2-W5-83-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiabrando F, Donadio E, Rinaudo F (2015) SfM for Orthophoto generation: a winning approach for cultural heritage knowledge. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-5/W7:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Reu J, Plets G, Verhoeven G, De Smedt P, Bats M, Cherrette B, De Maeyer W, Deconynck J, Herremans D, Laloo P, Van Meirvenne M, De Clercq W (2013) Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. J Archaeol Sci 40:1108–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellepiane M, Dell'Unto N, Callieri M, Lindgren S, Scopigno R (2013) Archeological excavation monitoring using dense stereo matching techniques. J Cult Herit 14:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetrescu E (2015) Archaeological stratigraphy as a formal language for virtual reconstruction. Theory and practice. J Archaeol Sci 57:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35(4):882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faugeras O, Luong Q-T (2004) The geometry of multiple images: the laws that govern the formation of multiple images of a scene and some of their applications. MIT press.

  • Fernández-Hernandez J, González-Aguilera D, Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, Mancera-Taboada J (2015) Image-based modelling from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry: an effective, low-cost tool for archaeological applications. Archaeometry 57(1):128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeazzi F, Moyes H, Aldenderfer M (2014) Defining best 3D practices in archaeology: comparing laser scanning and dense stereo matching techniques for 3D intra-site data recording. Adv Archaeol Pract 2(4):353–365. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.2.4.353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonizzi Barsanti S, Remondino F, Visintini D (2013) 3D surveying and modelling of archaeological sites – some critical issues -. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume II-5/W1, pp. 145–150.

  • Guidi G, Russo M, Angheleddu D (2014) 3D survey and virtual reconstruction of archeological sites. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 1(2):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley R, Zisserman A (2003) Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press.

  • Howland MD, Jones IWN, Najjar M, Levy TE (2018) Quantifying the effects of erosion on archaeological sites with low-altitude aerial photography, structure from motion, and GIS: a case study from southern Jordan. J Archaeol Sci 90:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knusel CJ, Haddow SD, Sadvari JW, Dell'Unto N (2013) Bioarchaeology in 3D: employing three-dimensional Technology in the Field and in the lab. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:170–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoudis A, Vidmar B, Ioannakis G, Arnaoutoglou F, Pavlidis G, Chamzas C (2015) Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation. J Cult Herit 15(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeschi G (2018) Rethinking GIS, three-dimensionality and space perception in archaeology. World Archaeol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1463171

  • Lerma JL, Navarro S, Cabrelles M, Villaverde V (2010) Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: the upper Palaeolithic cave of Parpallo as a case study. J Archaeol Sci 37(3):499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Brutto M, Sciortino R, Garraffa A (2017) RPAS and TLS techniques for archaeological survey: the case study or the archaeological site of Eraclea Minoa (Italy). Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2/W3:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti N, Angelini I, Artioli G, Benati G, Bitelli G, Curci A, Marfia G, Roccetti M (2017) NEARCHOS. Networked archaeological Open Science: advances in archaeology through field analytics and scientific community sharing. J Archaeol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-017-9112-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patias P (2007) Cultural heritage documentation. In: Fryer J, Mitchell H, Chandler J (eds) Application of 3D Measurement from Images, vol 59. Whittles, Dunbeath, pp 225–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Patias P, Grussenmeyer P, Hanke K (2008) Applications in cultural heritage documentation. In: Li Z, Chen J, Baltsavias E (eds) Advances in Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondino F, Del Pizzo S, Kersten TP, Troisi S (2012) Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation – a critical overview. Progress in cultural heritage preservation, proceedings of the 4th international conference, EuroMed 2012, Limassol, Cyprus, October 29–November 3, pp. 40–54, Springer ed.

  • Remondino F, Spera MG, Nocerino E, Menna F, Nex F (2014) State of the art in high density image matching. Photogramm Rec 29(146):144–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeliski R (2010) Computer vision: algorithms and applications. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Tucci G, Bonora V (2015) Geomatics and management of at-risk cultural heritage. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 26(Suppl 1):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0427-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven G (2011) Taking computer vision aloft - archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with PhotoScan. Archaeol Prospect 18:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven G, Doneus M, Briese C, Vermeulen F (2012) Mapping by matching: a computer vision-based approach to fast and accurate Georeferencing of archaeological aerial photographs. J Archaeol Sci 39:2060–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel W, Rothermel M, Fritsch D, Haala N (2013) Image acquisition and model selection for multi-view stereo. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-5/W1:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the company adArte snc, Rimini (Italy), who conducted the excavation, and Dr. Anna Bondini of the Archeology Superintendent of Emilia-Romagna region, who has realized its scientific direction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Bitelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bitelli, G., Girelli, V.A. & Sammarini, G. 4-dimensional recording and visualization of urban archeological excavations. Appl Geomat 10, 415–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0239-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0239-x

Keywords

Navigation