Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interference of two closely spaced footings embedded in unreinforced and reinforced soil medium: a finite element approach using ABAQUS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stress or the failure zone of footings placed at close proximity interfere altering the performance of the footings. The present study pertains finite element analysis of two closely spaced rough, rigid strip footings embedded in cohesion-less foundation soil medium using the commercially available software ABAQUS. The interfering footings are considered to be supported on homogeneous reinforced and unreinforced soil medium. The failure criterion of the soil is directed to follow Mohr–Coulomb criterion with the non-associated flow rule. The influence of interference phenomenon on the ultimate bearing capacity, settlement and load-settlement characteristics have been explored by considering and varying the various parameters such as depth of embedment, soil friction angle, depth of reinforcement (first layer and subsequent layer), number of reinforcement layers and length of reinforcement. The soil friction angle is one of the important factors to have an effect on bearing capacity, and the friction angle is varied between 20° to 40°. The ultimate bearing capacity of closely spaced footings over unreinforced and reinforced soils are represented by non-dimensionless efficiency factors (ξUR and ξR). The analyses results conclude that interference has a significant influence on bearing capacity and settlement of footings supported over unreinforced and reinforced soil medium. Although, soil friction angle affects the interference significantly (higher friction angle has the highest peak of efficiency factor), depth of footing embedment also has remarkable influence over the same. The peak of efficiency factor decreases with an increase in the depth of footing embedment for a specified soil friction angle; however, the same increases with increase in soil friction angle for a specified depth of footing embedment. The interference effect is found to be decreasing with increase in the embedment depth. The bearing capacity of interfering footings on reinforced soil is enhanced noticeably compared to that on unreinforced footings; however, the settlement is not predominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS. ABAQUS/Standard user’s manual, volume II version 6.10, year 2010. Rhode Island: Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorenson Inc.

  • Abu-Farsakh MY, Gu J, Voyiadjis GZ, Chen Q (2014) Mechanistic–empirical analysis of the results of finite element analysis on flexible pavement with geogrid base reinforcement. Int J Pavement Eng 15(9):786–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ashou MO, Sulaiman RM, Mandal JN (1994) Effect of number of reinforcing layers on the interference between footings on reinforced sand. Indian Geotech J 24:285–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar PK, Saha S, Deb K (2007) Circular footings resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Geotext Geomembr 25:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar PK, Dixit PM, Gharpure A, Deb K (2008) Finite element analysis of geotextile-reinforced sand-bed subjected to strip loading. Geotext Geomembr 26:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Mittal S (2017) Square footing on geocell reinforced cohesionless soils. Geomech Eng 13:641–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Boushehrian JH, Hataf N (2003) Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 21:241–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Das BM, Larbi-Cherif S (1983) Bearing capacity of two closely-spaced shallow foundations on sand. Soils Found 23:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • De Borst R, Vermeer PA (1984) Possibilites and limitations of finite elements for limit analysis. Geotechnique 34(2):199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Konai S (2014) Bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced sand with varying fine fraction. Geomech Eng 6:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Sivakugan N, Chandra S, Basudhar PK (2007) Numerical analysis of multi layer geosynthetic-reinforced granular bed over soft fill. Geotech Geol Eng 25:639–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson HL, Drescher A (2002) Bearing capacity of circular footings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Frydman S, Burd HJ (1997) Numerical studies of bearing-capacity factor Nγ. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazavi M, Lavasan AA (2008) Interference effect of shallow foundations constructed on sand reinforced with geosynthetics. Geotext Geomembr 26:404–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P, Kumar S (2011) Interference effect of two nearby strip surface footings on cohesionless layered soil. Int J Geotech Eng 5:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Raymond GP, Suppiah A (1984) Bearing capacity of three closely-spaced footings on sand. Geotechnique 34:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths DV (1982) Computation of bearing capacity factors using finite elements. Geotechnique 32(3):195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Menq FY (1997) Deep-footing and wide-slab effects in reinforced sandy ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Khing KH, Das BM, Yen SC et al (1992) Interference effect of two closely-spaced shallow strip foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Geol Eng 10:257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Cook EE, Yen SC (1993) The bearing-capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12 (4):351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzer KM, Kumar J (2008) Ultimate bearing capacity of equally spaced multiple strip footings on cohesionless soils without surcharge. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1417–1426

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Bhattacharya P (2010) Bearing capacity of interfering multiple strip footings by using lower bound finite elements limit analysis. Comput Geotech 37:731–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Bhoi MK (2008) Interference of multiple strip footings on sand using small scale model tests. Geotech Geol Eng 26:469

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Bhoi MK (2009) Interference of two closely spaced strip footings on sand using model tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:595–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Ghosh P (2007a) Ultimate bearing capacity of two interfering rough strip footings. Int J Geomech 7:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Ghosh P (2007b) Upper bound limit analysis for finding interference effect of two nearby strip footings on sand. Geotech Geol Eng 25:499

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Kouzer KM (2008) Bearing capacity of two interfering footings. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Saran S (2003) Closely spaced footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:660–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Saran S (2004) Closely spaced rectangular footings on reinforced sand. Geotech Geol Eng 22:497–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavasan AA, Ghazavi M (2012) Behavior of closely spaced square and circular footings on reinforced sand. Soils Found 52:160–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabrouki A, Benmeddour D, Frank R, Mellas M (2010) Numerical study of the bearing capacity for two interfering strip footings on sands. Comput Geotech 37:431–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof GG (1951) The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations. Geotechnique 2:301–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof GG (1963) Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Can Geotech J 1:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderi E, Hataf N (2014) Model testing and numerical investigation of interference effect of closely spaced ring and circular footings on reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 42:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Nainegali LS, Basudhar PK, Ghosh P (2013) Interference of two asymmetric closely spaced strip footings resting on nonhomogeneous and linearly elastic soil bed. Int J Geomech 13:840–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Nainegali L, Basudhar PK, Ghosh P (2018) Interference of strip footings resting on nonlinearly elastic foundation bed: a finite element analysis. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 42:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazzal MD, Abu-Farsakh MY, Mohammad LN (2010) Implementation of a critical state two-surface model to evaluate the response of geosynthetic reinforced pavements. Int J Geomech 10(5):202–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorzad R, Manavirad E (2014) Bearing capacity of two close strip footings on soft clay reinforced with geotextile. Arab J Geosci 7:623–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar MT, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC (1993a) Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Can Geotech J 30:545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar MT, Das BM, Yen S-C et al (1993b) Ultimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Test J 16:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra CR, Das BM, Atalar C (2005) Bearing capacity of embedded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 23:454–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra CR, Das BM, Bhoi M, Shin EC (2006) Eccentrically loaded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 24:254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart JG (1962) Interference between foundations, with special reference to surface footings in sand. Geotechnique 12:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (1973) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 99

  • Vivek P (2011) Static and dynamic interference of strip footings in layered soil. M.Tech. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

  • Yetimoglu T, Wu JT, Saglamer A (1994) Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. J Geotech Eng 120:2083–2099

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin JH, Wang YJ, Selvadurai APS (2001) Influence of nonassociativity on the bearing capacity of a strip footing. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(11):985–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu HS, Sloan SW (1997) Finite element limit analysis of reinforced soils. Comput Struct 63(3):567–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India

    Anupkumar G. Ekbote & Lohitkumar Nainegali

Authors
  1. Anupkumar G. Ekbote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lohitkumar Nainegali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lohitkumar Nainegali.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Wissem Frikha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekbote, A.G., Nainegali, L. Interference of two closely spaced footings embedded in unreinforced and reinforced soil medium: a finite element approach using ABAQUS. Arab J Geosci 12, 683 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4868-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4868-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation