Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of maximal water bursting discharge from coal seam floor based on multiple nonlinear regression analysis

  • ISMSSE 2018
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aimed at the influences of various complicated factors for water inrush from a coal seam floor during coal seam mining, the prediction of the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor is regarded as a problem of pattern identification with nonlinear, high dimensions, and finite samples. Based on information fusion theory and regarding the prediction of maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor as a process of multisource information fusion and state estimation, an evaluation system of the main controlling factors for predicting the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor was established. An evaluation model for forecasting the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor was also structured according to multiple nonlinear regression theory. Considering the major coal mines of Xinwen coalfield as the research background, six factors are selected as the basic discriminant factors, i.e., aquifer thickness, unit water inflow, water pressure, aquiclude thickness, fault influencing factor, and depth of a coal seam floor destroyed by rock pressure. Deng’s grey relational theory was used to analyze the correlation degrees between each main controlling factor and the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor. A structural equation model was adopted to reveal the internal connecting links among the key influencing factors and determine the weights of each main controlling factor for predicting the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor. An SPSS scatter plot and MATLAB functional programming were applied to fit the correlativity curves between each main controlling factor and the maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor in the Xinwen Mining Area. The optimal unitary nonlinear regression models between the maximal water bursting discharge from the coal seam floor and each main control factor were established. A multiple nonlinear regression–modified model for predicting the maximal water bursting discharge from the coal seam floor was acquired using a multiple nonlinear regression analysis with the combined weights of each main control factor. Compared with the bivariant multiple regression equation and the measured data, the results showed that the average values of forecasting errors predicted by the multiple nonlinear regression–modified model and bivariant multiple regression equation are 10.53% and 16.76%, respectively, which indicates that the multiple nonlinear regression–modified model and the bivariant multiple regression equation have higher prediction accuracy and relatively smaller error ranges, with comparatively better application value in the prediction of maximal water bursting discharge from a coal seam floor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borgia A, Cattaneo L, Marconi D, Delcroix C, Rossi EL, Clemente G, Amoroso CG, Lo Re F, Tozzato E (2010) Using a MODFLOW grid, generated with GMS, to solve a transport problem with TOUGH2 in complex geological environments: the intertidal deposits of the Venetian Lagoon. Comput Geosci 37:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti L, Brivio PA, Gregoire JM (2003) The use of Meteosat and GMS imagery to detect burned areas in tropical environments. Remote Sens Environ 85:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao QG, Jia B, Chen H et al (2013) Multi-level control technology of coal mine accident risk. Disaster Adv 6:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng JL, Sun XY, Zheng G et al (2013a) Numerical simulations of water-inrush induced by fault activation during deep coal mining based on fluid-solid coupling interaction. Disaster Adv 6:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng WM, Yu YB, Wan CX et al (2013b) Study on seepage properties of coal under the role of high pore water pressure. Disaster Adv 6:350–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan QT, Nie YC, Wang W, Hu RX (2011) MATLAB 2012 mathematical calculation and engineering analysis from accidence to mastery. Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao LH, Han ZZ, Han Y, Han C, Wei FF, Qin Z (2013) Controlling of cements and physical property of sandstone by fault as observed in well Xia503 of Huimin sag, Linnan sub-depression. Sci China Earth Sci 56:1942–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han CH, Liu WS (2005) Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) and prevention and control of mine water. Mining Safety and Environmental Protection 32:25–26 + 41-0.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YF, Xu GF, Zuo CM (2007) Lianghuayuan mine water inflow estimation. Coal Geology of China 19:38–40 + 47 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li ZX, Wang DD, Lv DW, Li Y, Liu H, Wang P, Liu Y, Liu J, Li D (2018) The geologic settings of Chinese coal deposits. Int Geol Rev 60:548–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CP, Sun YJ, Yang LH, Jiang S, Shao FY (2007) Prediction of mine water inflow with pore water filling based on BP neural network. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 34:55–58 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XM, Xu RF, Zhang RY (2008) The application model of Deng’s grey relational analysis. Statistics and Decision 10:23–25 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu M, Shi LQ, Teng C, Zhou Y (2017) Assessment of water inrush risk using the fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy process and Grey relational analysis in the Liangzhuang Coal Mine, China. Mine Water Environ 36:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz O, Karssenberg D, van Deursen WPA, Wesseling CG (2009) Linking external components to a spatio-temporal modelling framework: coupling MODFLOW and PCRaster. Environ Model Softw 24:1088–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi LQ, Han J (2004) Floor water-inrush mechanism and prediction. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi LQ, Teng C, Li CS, Wang DD (2015) Influence of fault quantitative on water inrush at floor limestone in Huaheng coal mine. Saf Coal Mines 46:23–26 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun WJ, Wu Q, Liu HL, Jiao J (2015) Prediction and assessment of the disturbances of the coal mining in Kailuan to karst groundwater system. Phys Chem Earth 89-90:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan YL, Zhao TB, Xiao YX et al (2010) Researches on floor stratum fracturing induced by antiprocedure mining underneath close-distance goaf. J Min Sci 46:250–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Meng FB (2018) Statistical analysis of large accidents in China’s coal mines in 2016. Nat Hazards 92:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Wu MM, Wang R, Xu H, Song X (2017) Height of the mining-induced fractured zone above a coal face. Eng Geol 216:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston RB (1999) MODFLOW-related freeware and shareware resources on the internet. Comput Geosci 25:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Wang J, Liu D et al (2009) A new practical methodology of the coal floor water bursting evaluating IV: the application of AHP vulnerable index method based on GIS. J China Coal Soc 34:233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue W (2015) Statistical analysis and the application of SPSS. China Renmin University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Gao F, Liu XG (2015) Effect of damage evolution of coal on permeability variation and analysis of gas outburst hazard with coal mining. Nat Hazards 79:999–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu WQ (2011) Study on the integration management of tea industry chain in Anxi. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SC, Guo WJ, Li YY (2017) Experimental simulation of water-inrush disaster from the floor of mine and its mechanism investigation. Arab J Geosci 10:503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao TB, Zhang ZY, Tan YL, Shi C, Wei P, Li Q (2014) An innovative approach to thin coal seam mining of complex geological conditions by pressure regulation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Yin YC, Cai LS, Pan JF (2018) Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at a depth of 800 m. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1539–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XB (2003) Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) software. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 30:53–55 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the experts for their careful work and thoughtful suggestions.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572244, 51804184, 41807283), the Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents (2017RCJJ033), and the Taishan Scholars Construction Projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Qiu.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mine Safety Science and Engineering

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qu, X., Qiu, M., Liu, J. et al. Prediction of maximal water bursting discharge from coal seam floor based on multiple nonlinear regression analysis. Arab J Geosci 12, 567 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4748-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4748-7

Keywords

Navigation