Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphometric analysis of the Idemili Basin using geospatial techniques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 April 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

The response of a watershed to produce runoff after rain event depends on the characteristics of the basin. This characteristic is peculiar to every basin and varies depending on the type of rock, geology, soil, climatic belt, and extent of anthropogenic activities. Information regarding these controlling factors is vital for a sustainable management of the basin. However, many of the watersheds especially in the developing world lack the basic facilities for acquiring the runoff data or other basin’s response to rainfall event like sediment yield. The simplest approach to obtaining such information is via the morphometric parameters of the basin. This necessitated the need for this study. The study carried out a morphometric analysis of the Idemili Basin in southeastern Nigeria by employing geospatial tools in ArcMap to investigate the basin’s characteristics. The basin is a fourth-order basin with a rectilinear drainage pattern. The shape parameters indicate a pear-shaped basin. The mean bifurcation ratio indicates the basin developed in a hilly terrain with somewhat geologic influences over time as it developed on a weak, porous sandstone. Intensive watershed management is needed in the basin to ensure the sustainability of the basin and its ecosystem. The study also demonstrates that geospatial techniques and the digital elevation model are vital tools for watershed characterisation especially in data-scarce regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 April 2019

    The authors wish update Tables 1 and 2 due to few minor corrections to make due to oversight. The corrections were emphasized as bold.

References

  • Bagyaraj M, Gurugnanam B, Nagar A (2011) Significance of morphometry studies, soil characteristics, erosion phenomena and landform processes using remote sensing and GIS for Kodaikanal Hills, a global biodiversity hotpot in Western Ghats, Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, South India. Res J Environ Earth Sci 3:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Majumdar DD, Banerjee S (2014) Morphometry governs the dynamics of a drainage basin: analysis and implications. Geogr J 2014:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson T (2013) Utilizing a high resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to develop a Stream Power Index (SPI) for the Gilmore creek watershed in Winona County, Minnesota. In: Papers in resource analysis, vol 15. Saint Marys University of Minnesota University Central Services Press, Winona, pp 1–11

  • Doornkamp JC, King CA (1971) Numerical analysis in geomorphology-an introduction. Edwardand Arnold, London, pp 3–20

  • Farhan Y (2017) Morphometric assessment of Wadi Wala Watershed, Southern Jordan using ASTER (DEM) and GIS. J Geogr Inf Syst 9:158–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti EV, Schneider WJ (1965) The distribution of branches in river networks. Professional paper, United States Geological Survey, Washington DC, pp 1–422

  • Gregory K, Walling D (1968) The variation of drainage density within a catchment. Hydrol Sci J 13:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundekar H, Arya D, Goel° N (2011) Morphometric study of the Dudhana river basin(Maharashtra). Hydrol J 34:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Horacio J (2014) River sinuosity index: geomorphological characterisation. Technical note 2. CIREF and Wetlands International, Ede, p 6

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage-basin characteristics. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe GM, Slaymaker HO, Harding DM (1966) Flood hazard in mid-Wales. Nature 212(5062):584–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifeka A, Akinbobola A (2015) Trend analysis of precipitation in some selected stations in Anambra State. Atmos Clim Sci 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe C (2012) Gully erosion in southeastern Nigeria: role of soil properties and environmental factors. In: Godone D, Stanchi S (eds) Research on soil erosion. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/51020

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Seth S, Nema R (1995) Morphometric analysis of Sei dam catchment using GIS. Proceedings of National Symposium on Hydrology, Jaipur, 5–7

  • Kirchner JW (1993) Statistical inevitability of Horton’s laws and the apparent randomness of stream channel networks. Geology 21:591–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V (2011) Elongation ratio. In: Singh VP, Singh P, Haritashya UK (eds) Encyclopedia of snow, ice and glaciers. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, p 1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, V. C. (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch mountain areas. USA, Technical Report, Columbia University, Department of Geology, Issue 3, p.51

  • Moeini A, Zarandi NK, Pazira E, Badiollahi Y (2015) The relationship between drainage density and soil erosion rate: a study of five watersheds in Ardebil Province, Iran. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 1:129–138

  • Ofomata GEK (1987) Soil erosion in Nigeria: the views of a geomorphologist. University of Nigeria Press, p 42

  • Rao NK, Latha SP, Kumar AP, Krishna HM (2010) Morphometric analysis of Gostani River basin in Andhra Pradesh state, India using Spatial information technology. Intl J Geomat Geosci 1(2):179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam KN, Srivastava Y, Rao VV, Amminedu E, Murthy K (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby M (1989) Fluvial forms and processes. By David Knighton. N Z Geogr 45:96–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyan K, Ahmed S (2004) The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ Geology 47:412-420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In: Chow V (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 439–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo RK (1975) Geogrpahical regions of Nigeria. Heinemann Educational Press Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstappen HT (1983) Applied geomorphology: geomorphological surveys for environmental development. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 437

  • Yunus AP, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS (2014) Morphometric analysis of drainage basins in the Western Arabian Peninsula using multivariate statistics. Int J Geosci 5:527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavoiance I (1985) Morphometry of drainage basins (developments in water science), vol 20. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–251

  • Zavoianu I (2011) Morphometry of drainage basins (developments in water science). Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 237

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Guilbert E (2012) A study of variables characterizing drainage patterns in river networks. ISPRS 39:B2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks go to my supervisor, Mr. A. T. Mozie, for his guidance throughout the duration of the project from which this piece is a product.

Funding

The NsukkaUSA Inc. is highly appreciated for financially supporting the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Uche Ezeh.

Additional information

Editorial handling: Biswajeet Pradhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ezeh, C.U., Mozie, A.T. Morphometric analysis of the Idemili Basin using geospatial techniques. Arab J Geosci 12, 208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4336-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4336-x

Keywords

Navigation