Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographic information system and AHP-based flood hazard zonation of Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood is one of the most common natural hazard that take place almost everywhere around the world except the polar regions. Flood damage can be reduced through implementing proper management and policies. Flood is a common hazard in Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, and occurs once in every 2 to 3 years; it causes severe damage to life and properties. Present days, remote sensing and geographic information system are very comprehensive tools for the assessment of hydrological analysis and hazard management. These tools are also capable to deliver quite an accurate result in a cost- and time-effective manner. Thus, in this paper, an attempt has been made to identify critical zones, which are having a higher vulnerability to the flood in the Vaitarna basin through remote sensing and geospatial approach. Total nine influencing factors, such as elevation, slope, distance from the river, rainfall, flow accumulation, land use, geology, topographic wetness index, and curvature have been assessed individually as well as integrated in GIS software by assigning relative weights through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach. As a result of this study, a final flood map has been prepared and the regions having very high flood potentiality are identified. The resultant map has shown about 20% of the total area in Vaitarna basin is having a very high probability of flood, and these regions are requiring some serious attention of governmental or non-governmental bodies to reduce the flood risk. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method proposed in this study is capable to provide an accurate result for flood mapping and can be easily applied to other regions around the world for the management and prevention of the flood hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaszadeh P (2016) Improving hydrological process modeling using optimized threshold-based wavelet de-noising technique. Water Resour Manag 30(5):1701–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajin RS, Krishnamurthy RR, Jayaprakash M, Vinod PG (2013) Flood hazard assessment of vamanapuram river basin, Kerala, India: an approach using remote sensing & GIS techniques. Adv Appl Sci Res 4(3):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Albano R, Mancusi L, Sole A, Adamowski J (2015) Collaborative strategies for sustainable EU flood risk management: FOSS and geospatial tools—challenges and opportunities for operative risk analysis. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 4(4):2704–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2012) Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change (2):229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstert A (2003) Floods and climate change: interactions and impacts. Risk Anal 23:545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M (2015) Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 22(5):420–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M (2016a) Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: a case study of Cide Coastline. Turkish J Agr Food Sci Technol 4(9):800–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M (2016b) Sustainability of urban coastal area management: a case study on Cide. J Sustain Forestry 35(7):527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Sevik H (2016) Assessing potential areas of ecotourism through a case study in Ilgaz Mountain National Park. doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/62573

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Kaya O, Sahap A (2018a) Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environ Dev Sustain 20(1):361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Sevik H, Canturk U, Cakir C (2018b) Evaluation of the recreational potential of Kutahya urban forest. Fresenius Environ Bull 27(5):2629–2634

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Zeren I, Sevik H, Cakir C, Akpinar H (2018c) A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environ Monit Asses 190(3):167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6534-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton R, Fealy R, Moore S, Sweeney J, Murphy C (2006) Assessing the impact of climate change on water supply and flood hazard in Ireland using statistical downscaling and hydrological modelling techniques. Clim Chang 74:475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH, Christensen OB (2003) Climate modelling: severe summertime flooding in Europe. Nature 421:805–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtillot VE, Besse J, Vandamme D, Montigny R, Jaeger J, Cappetta H (1986) Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary? Earth Planet Sci Lett 80:361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danandeh Mehr A, Kahya E (2017) A Pareto-optimal moving average multigene genetic programming model for daily streamflow prediction. J Hydrol 549:603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danandeh Mehr A, Kahya E, Olyaie E (2013) Streamflow prediction using linear genetic programming in comparison with a neurowavelet technique. J Hydrol 505:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S (2017) Signatures of morphotectonic activities in western upland Maharashtra and Konkan region. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis submitted to Savitribai Phule Pune University

  • Das S, Pardeshi SD (2018a) Comparative analysis of lineaments extracted from Cartosat, SRTM and Aster DEM: a study based on four watersheds in Konkan region, India. Spat Inf Res 26(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0155-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Pardeshi SD (2018b) Morphometric analysis of Vaitarna and Ulhas river basins, Maharashtra, India: using geospatial techniques. Appl Water Sci 8(6):158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0801-z

  • Das S, Gupta A, Ghosh S (2017) Exploring groundwater potential zones using MIF techniques in semi-arid region: a case study of Hingoli district, Maharashtra. Spat Inf Res 25(6):749–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0144-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Pardeshi SD, Kulkarni PP, Doke A (2018) Extraction of lineaments from different azimuth angles using geospatial techniques: a case study of Pravara basin, Maharashtra, India. Arab J Geosci 11:160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3522-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doke A, Pardeshi SD, Pardeshi SS, Das S (2018) Identification of morphogenetic regions and respective geomorphic processes: a GIS approach. Arab J Geosci 11:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3358-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dottori F, Salamon P, Bianchi A, Alfieri L, Hirpa FA, Feyen L (2016) Development and evaluation of a framework for global flood hazard mapping. Adv. Water Resour 94:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou X, Song J, Wang L, Tang B, Xu S, Kong F, Jiang X (2017) Flood risk assessment and mapping based on a modified multi-parameter flood hazard index model in the Guanzhong Urban Area, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1429-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RA, Pyle DG (1988) Rapid eruption of the Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Nature 333:841–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein D, Lichter M (2014) Social and economic vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise and extreme flooding. Nat Hazards 71(1):463–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Carranza EJM, Van-Westen CJ, Jetten VG, Bhattacharya DN (2011) Selecting and weighting spatial predictors for empirical modeling of landslide susceptibility in the Darjeeling Himalayas (India). Geomorphology 131:35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81:65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guneralp B, Guneralp I, Liu Y (2015) Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Glob Environ Change 31:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo E, Zhang J, Ren X, Zhang Q, Sun Z (2014) Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province China. Nat Hazards 74(2):947–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Panahi M, Shirzadi A, Ma T, Liu J, Zhu A, Chen W, Kougias I, Kazakis N (2017) Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. World Bank Publications, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN (2005) Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Nat Hazards 34:151–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur H, Gupta S, Prakash S, Thapa R, Mandal R (2017) Geospatial modelling of flood susceptibility pattern in a subtropical area of West Bengal, India. Environ Earth Sci 76:339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya E, Agca M, Aduguzel F, Centin M (2018) Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess: Int J:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896

  • Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR (2016a) A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR, Chapi K, Bahri M (2016b) Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess 188:656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kron W (2002) Keynote lecture: flood risk = hazard exposure vulnerability. In: Proceedings of the Flood Defence. Scieence Press, New York Ltd., ISBN 1-880132-54-0

  • Lim J, Lee K (2017) Investigating flood susceptible areas in inaccessible regions using remote sensing and geographic information system. Environ Monit Assess 189:96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, Schmidtke R (2004) Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 4:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojaddadi H, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Ahmad N, Ghazali AHB (2017) Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazard Risk 8:1080–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis S, Guneralp B, Jongman B, Aerts JC, Ward PJ (2015) Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: a probabilistic analysis using global data. Sci Total Environ 538:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Tahershamsi A, Abbaszadeh P, Shahrabi J, Hadavandi E (2014) A new hybrid algorithm for rainfall-runoff process modeling based on the wavelet transform and genetic fuzzy system. J Hydroinf 16(5):1004–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opolot E (2013) Application of remote sensing and geographical information systems in flood management: a review. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 6:1884–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande K, Venkatesan TR, Gopalan K, Krishnamurthy P, Macdougall JD (1988) 40Ar-39Ar ages of alkali basalts from Kutch, Deccan volcanic province, India. Mem Geol Soc India 10:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2009) Groundwater potential zonation for basaltic watersheds using satellite remote sensing data and GIS techniques. Open Geosci 1:120–129. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10085-009-0008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin M, Cheng J, Zhang P, Yan J, Liu X, Wang X (2011) Research on ecological safety and utilization pattern on the lower reaches wetland of the yellow river in Kaifeng city. Procedia Environ Sci 10:2654–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risi RD, Jalayer F, Paola FD, Lindley S (2017) Delineation of flooding risk hotspot based on digital elevation model, calculated and historical flooding extents: the case of Ouagadougou. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 32:1545–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1450-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas R, Feyen L, Bianchi A, Dosio A (2012) Assessment of future flood hazard in Europe using a large ensemble of bias-corrected regional climate simulations. J Geophys Res Atmos 117:D17109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozalis S, Morin E, Yair Y, Price C (2010) Flash flood prediction using an uncalibrated hydrological model and radar rainfall data in a Mediterranean watershed under changing hydrological conditions. J Hydrol 394:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. McGraw, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson CC, Smith AM, Bates PD, Neal JC, Alfieri L, Freer JE (2015) A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Water Resour Res 51:7358–7381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senanayake IP, Dissanayake DMDOK, Mayadunna BB, Weerasekera WL (2016) An approach to delineate groundwater recharge potential sites in Ambalantota, Sri Lanka using GIS techniques. Geosci Fron 7:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su W, Zhang X, Wang Z, Su X, Huang J, Yang S, Liu S (2011) Analyzing disaster-forming environments and the spatial distribution of flood disasters and snow disasters that occurred in China from 1949 to 2000. Math Comput Model 54(3–4):1069–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares AO, Santos PPD, Freire P, Fortunato AB, Rilo A, Sa L (2015) Flooding hazard in the Tagus estuarine area: the challenge of scale in vulnerability assessments. Environ Sci Pol 51:238–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2013) Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol 504:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol 512:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N (2015) Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena 125:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson M, Cox KG (1996) Uplift and erosional history of Deccan Traps, India: evidence from laterites and drainage patterns of the Western Ghats and Konkan Coast. Earth Planetary Sci Lett 137:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1912) On the methods of measuring association between two attributes. J R Stat Soc 75:579–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharia L, Costache R, Pravalie R, Ioana-Toroimac G (2017) Mapping flood and flooding potential indices: a methodological approach to identifying areas susceptible to flood and flooding risk. Case study: the Prahova catchment (Romania). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0636-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author indicates his gratitude and appreciation to Dr. Veena U. Joshi (Prof. and Head, Dept. of Geography, Savitribai Phule Pune University) and all the department stuffs for providing necessary facilities and encouraging to perform this study. The author is thankful to the Director of India Meteorological Department (IMD, Pune) for providing rainfall data. Mr. Arjun B. Doke is acknowledged for assisting rainfall data analysis. Further, the author is thankful to two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for reviewing this manuscript and their constructive comments which improved the manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S. Geographic information system and AHP-based flood hazard zonation of Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India. Arab J Geosci 11, 576 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3933-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3933-4

Keywords

Navigation