Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Kahramanmaras Province, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kahramanmaras and its surroundings are under the influence of East Anatolian and Dead Sea fault zones which have significance in the tectonics of Turkey. The long-term energy accumulation in these zones creates a very high risk level in terms of seismic hazard. In this study, the seismic hazard of Kahramanmaras Province and its vicinity was tried to be determined by using the probabilistic seismic hazard method approach. The earthquake catalog used in the study comprises 424 earthquakes equal or greater than M w  = 4.0, covering a time period between 1 January 1900 and 1 January 2015. The earthquake data have been compiled from the catalogs of the International Seismological Center (ISC), Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Precidency (RTPMDEMP), Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. Seismic sources that could affect the study area have been identified according to the Earthquake Model of the Middle East (EMME). Seismic hazard parameters and peak horizontal acceleration values were obtained by using the selected attenuation relationships, and the results were given with iso-acceleration maps corresponding to a recurrence period of 475 years. The calculated peak horizontal acceleration values are generally varying between 0.21 and 0.41 in the study area. The result of this study shows that the southeastern parts of the study area have a greater seismic hazard compared with other parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN (1990) Uniform magnitude re-evaluation of European earthquakes associated with strong-motion records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards 48:145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardeleanu L, Leydecker G, Bonjer K-P, Busche H, Kaiser D, Schmitt T (2005) Probabilistic seismic hazard map for Romania as a basis for a new building code. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:679–684 http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/5/679/2005/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpat E, Saroglu F (1972) The East Anatolian fault system: thoughts on its development. Min Res Expl Inst Turk Bull 78:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Askan A, Un EM, Yilmaz N, Yucemen MS (2010) Estimation of seismic damage in the Antakya region due to background seismic activity, workshop on seismic risk assessment and mitigation in the Antakya-Maras region on the basis of microzonation vulnerability and preparedness studies, Antakya

  • Barka A, Akyüz S, Altınel E (1999) Adana çevresi’nin güncel tektoniği ve 1998 Adana Depremi. Türkiye Deprem Vakfı, Aktif Tektonik-2, sf. 20–31, İstanbul (current tectonics of Adana's environment and 1998 Adana earthquake. Turkey earthquake foundation, active Tectonics-2, pp. 20–31) (in Turkish)

  • Bender B (1986) Modeling source zone boundary uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76(2):329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Biringen E (2000) Soil amplification and case studies for clayey soils, Master Thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul

  • Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (2016) http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/zeqdb/

  • Bogdanov NA, Khain VE, Koronovsky NV, Lomize MG, Chekhovich VD (1994) Tectonic map of the Mediterranean Sea (1:5,000,000). Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western north American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaruttini C, Siro L (1981) The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy, and the Alpide belt. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:1993–2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Das R, Sharma ML, Wason HR (2016) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for northeast India region. Pure Appl Geophys 173:2653–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1990) Effects of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:2191–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz A, Yücemen MS (2005) Assessment of seismic hazard for the Antalya region using stochastic methods (in Turkish). In: Proceedings, Congress on the Civil Engineering Problems of the Antalya Region, pp 540–551

  • Der Kiureghian A, Ang AHS (1977) A fault rupture model for seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67(4):1173–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J, Byerly P (1969) The early history of seismometry (to 1900). Bull Seismol Soc Am 59:183–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Model of the Middle East (EMME) (2014) http://www.share-eu.org/node/70

  • Erdik M, Doyuran V, Gulkan P, Akkas N (1985) A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117:295–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Biro YA, Onur T, Sesetyan K, Birgoren G (1999) Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring regıons. Ann Geofis 42(6):1125–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti I, Bricchi G, Del Ben A, Pipan M, Xuan Z (1988) Geophysical study of the Black Sea. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 30:197–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasperini P, Ferrari G (2000) Deriving numerical estimates from descriptive information: the computation of earthquake parameters. Ann Geofis 43:729–746

    Google Scholar 

  • GDDA (1996) Earthquake hazard map of Turkey, General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Earthquake Research Department, Ankara

  • Genc G (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Eskisehir, Thesis (Master), Middle East Technical University (METU) Department of Geological Engineering

  • Ghasemi H, McKee C, Leonard M, Cummins P, Moihoi M, Spiro S, Taranu F, Buri E (2016) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of Papua New Guinea. Nat Hazards 81:1003–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini D, Di Donato M, Boschi E (1997) Calibration of magnitude scales for earthquakes of the Mediterranean. J Seismol 1:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul MA (1987) K.Maraş Yöresinin Jeolojisi ve Petrol Olanakları. T.P. Rap. No: 2359, Ankara. (Geology and Oil Possibilities of K. Maraş Region, T. P. Report. No: 2359), (unpublished), (in Turkish)

  • Gulen L, Pınar A, Kalafat D, Ozel N, Horasan G, Yılmazer M, Işıkara AM (2002) Surface fault breaks, aftershock distribution, and rupture process of the august 17, 1999 İzmit, Turkey earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(1):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulkan P, Yucemen MS (1991) Seismic hazard determination in regions having diffused boundaries, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, vol 1, pp 65–70

  • Gulkan P, Koçyiğit A, Yücemen MS, Doyuran V, Başöz N (1993) En son Verilere Göre Hazırlanan Türkiye Deprem Bölgeleri Haritası, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Deprem Mühendisliği Araştırma Merkezi, Rapor no. 93-01, Ankara. (Turkey earthquake zones map prepared by most recent data, Middle East Technical University, earthquake engineering research center, report no. 93-01) (in Turkish)

  • Gutdeutsch R, Kaiser D, Jentzsch G (2002) Estimation of earthquake magnitudes from epicentral intensities and other focal parameters in central and southern Europe. Geophys J Int 151(3):824–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B (1957) Effects on ground on earthquake motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 47:221–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1949) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasal ME, Iyisan R (2004) Influence of local soil conditions on soil amplification: one and two dimensional behavior, 10. National Congress on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Istanbul, pp 343–352 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ince GC (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the historical peninsula of Istanbul. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:3483–3493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Seis. Center (2016) http://www.isc.ac.uk, Internatl. Seis. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom

  • Johnston AC (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions I. Instrumental seismicity. Geophys J Int 124:381–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E, Gulkan P (2004) Site-dependent spectra derived from ground motion records in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 20(4):1111–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal RF, Beyhan G, Keskinsezer A (2014) Seismic hazard analysis of Sinop Province, Turkey using probabilistic and statistical methods. J Earth Syst Sci 123(3):565–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebede F, Van Eck T (1996) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the horn of Africa based on seismotectonic regionalization. Tectonophysics 270:221–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, El-Emam M, Irfan M, Abdalla J (2013) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and spectral accelerations for United Arab Emirates. Nat Hazards 67:569–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Graham G (1999) Parametric historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, part ii, assessment of seismic hazard at specific site. Pure Appl Geophys 154:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A (1984) Güneybatı Türkiye ve Yakın Dolayında Levha İçi Yeni Tektonik Gelişim, T.J.K, Bült., 27, 1.16, Ankara, (New tectonic development in the southwest of Turkey and nearby), (in Turkish)

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 653p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutanis M, Bal IE (2006) Effects of local soil conditions on structure damage distribution, 11. National Congress of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Trabzon, pp 99–113 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm CD, Bungum H (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard; a review of the seismological frame of reference with examples from Norway. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm CD, Bungum H (2003) Microzonation studies in Central America. Fourth International, Conf. of Eq. Eng. and Seism., 12–14 May 2003, Tehran, Iran

  • McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S, Georgiev I, Gürkan O, Hamburger M, Hurst K, Kahle H, Kastens K, Nadariya M, Ouzounis A, Paradissis D, Peter Y, Prilepin M, Reilinger R, Şanlı I, Seeger H, Tealeb A, Toksöz MN, Veis G (2000) GPS constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1976) A Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis, USGS Open File Report No 76–67

  • Milne J (1898) Seismology, 1st edn. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trube, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima M, Choi I, Ohtori Y, Choun Y (2007) Evaluation of seismic hazard curves and scenario earthquakes for Korean sites based on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Nucl Eng Des 237:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordaz M, Aguilar A, Arboleda J (2007) CRISIS2007, Ver. 7.2, program for computing seismic hazard, Instituto de Ingeniería, UNAM, Mexico

  • Orhan A, Seyrek E, Tosun H (2007) A probabilistic approach for earthquake hazard assessment of the province of Eskisehir, Turkey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozgirgin F (1997) Case studies on soil amplification, Master Thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul

  • Ozmen B (2001) Kastamonu ilinin depremselliği ve deprem tehlikesi, 54. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı 7–10 Mayıs, TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası, Ankara. (Seismicity of Kastamonu province and earthquake hazard, 54th Geological Congress of Turkey), in Turkish

  • Papazachos BC, Papaioannou CA (1999) Lithospheric boundaries and plate motions in the Cyprus area. Tectonophysics 308:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polat O, Gok E, Yilmaz D (2008) Earthquake hazard of the Aegean extension region (West Turkey), Turkish. J Earth Sci (Turkish J Earth Sci) 17:593–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafi Z, Lindholm C, Bungum H, Laghari A, Ahmed N (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard of Pakistan, Azad-Jammu and Kashmir. Nat Hazards 61:1317–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. W.F. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, and Bailey Bros. & Swinfen Ltd., London

  • Robertson AHF, Grasso M (1995) Overview of the late tertiary recent tectonic and paleo environmental development of the Mediterranean region. Terra Nova 7:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RTPMDEMP (2016) Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Precidency Earthquake database, Ankara

  • Sabetta F, Lucantoni A, Bungum H, Bommer JJ (2005) Sensitivity of PSHA results to ground motion prediction relations and logic-tree weights. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safak E (2001) Local site effects and dynamic soil behavior. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon A, Hofstetter A, Garfunkel Z, Ron H (1996) Seismicity in the eastern Mediterranean region: perspective from the Sinai subplate. Tectonophysics 263:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selcuk L, Selcuk AS, Beyaz T (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Lake van basin, Turkey. Nat Hazards 54:949–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengor AMC, Yilmaz Y (1981) Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75:181–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonova SD, Solakov DE, Leydecker G, Busche H, Schmitt T, Kaiser D (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard map for Bulgaria as a basis for a new building code. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:881–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromeyer D, Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2004) Chi-square regression for seismic strength parameter relations, and their uncertainties, with applications to an mw based earthquake catalogue for central, northern and northwestern Europe. J Seismol 8(1):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezcan SS, Kaya E, Bal IE, Ozdemir Z (2002) Seismic amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul. Eng Struct 24:661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trianni SCT, Lai CG, Pasqualini E (2014) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at a strategic site in the bay of Bengal. Nat Hazards 74:1683–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veneziano D, Cornell CA, O’Hara T (1984) Historic method for seismic hazard analysis, elect. Power res. Inst., report NP-3438, Palo alto

  • Wood HD (1908) Distribution of apparent intensity in San Francisco, in the California earthquake of April 18, 1906, report of the state earthquake investigation commission, Carnegie institute, Washington, D.C., Publ 87, 220–245

  • Yalçın H, Gülen L, Utkucu M (2013) Active fault data base and assessment of earthquake hazard for Turkey and surrounding regions. Bull Earth Sci Appl Res Centre Hacettepe Univ 34(3):133–160 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcinkaya E (2002) Effects of soil properties on earthquake ground motions: 1 October 1995 Dinar and 27 June 1998 Adana-Ceyhan earthquake samples, Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul University, Istanbul

  • Yıldırım M (1989) Kahramanmaraş kuzeyindeki (Engizek-Nurhak Dağları) tektonik birliklerin jeolojik petrolojik incelenmesi, Doktora Tezi: İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 306s. (TPAO Arama Grubu no.2970), İstanbul, (Geological and petrological investigation of tectonic units in north of Kahramanmaras province (Engizek-Nurhak Mountains)), phd thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Science and Technology), (un published), (in Turkish)

  • Yılmaz Y (1993) New evidence and model on the evolution of the southeast Anatolian Orogen. Geol Soc Am Bull 105:251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Y, Yigitbaş E, Genç CŞ (1993) Ophiolitic and metamorphic assemblages of southeast Anatolia and their significance in the geological evolution of the orogenic belt. Tectonics 12:1280–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

After the scientific revisions, this paper was linguistically supported by the Mersin Technology Transfer Office Academic Writing Center of Mersin University on a minor scale in accordance with the recommendation of referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talas Fikret Kurnaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ince, Y., Kurnaz, T.F. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Kahramanmaras Province, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11, 97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3434-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3434-5

Keywords

Navigation