Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated study of seismic and well data for porosity estimation using multi-attribute transforms: a case study of Boonsville Field, Fort Worth Basin, Texas, USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study represents part of a research project focused on the Runaway Surface (MFS53), which is one of the reservoir levels in the Boonsville Field of the Fort Worth Basin in north central Texas, USA. This reservoir system is a subunit of the Bend Conglomerate section, which is a productive series of gas reservoirs deposited during the Middle Pennsylvanian fluvio-deltaic environment. This paper adopts an integrated approach to the seismic and well log data, using a combination of geostatistical and multi-attribute regression transform methods. The main focus of the research is to accurately predict the porosity distribution of the Runaway Formation away from the well locations. The input data consists of 32 wells (of which six wells contain porosity logs) together with a 3D seismic volume of Boonsville Field. The 3D seismic volume was inverted to obtain the acoustic impedance cube of the study area. Secondly, six multi-attribute data slices were extracted from both surface seismic and inverted acoustic impedance volumes. Subsequently, the porosity distribution of a selected reservoir level was estimated over the full extent of the study area using both acoustic impedance alone, and multi-attributes. Initially, the multi-attribute transform algorithm was trained using the well log data. The porosity at each well location was averaged over a particular depth zone of interest, and then compared with six extracted attribute slices averaged over the same depth window. In order to select the appropriate number of attributes for analysis, a cross-validation process was followed. The results of this cross-validation process and the training of the multi-attribute transforms were applied to the extracted attribute slices in order to produce the final porosity map of the Runaway Formation. The cross-plot between the seismically derived porosity and the well porosity values showed that accuracy of porosity prediction was increased from 75 %, when using a single attribute (acoustic impedance (AI)), to 90 % when multiple attributes are used. Additionally, when the actual well-derived porosities were overlaid onto the final predicted porosity maps from both techniques, a significant amount of mismatching was observed on the porosity map derived from AI alone, whereas the predicted porosity with the multi-attribute regression transform was a close match to the actual well-derived porosities. Beside this, the subsurface geology (i.e., karst collapse features) were not clear in the porosity map deduced from AI. Based on these cross-correlation results, the porosity map derived from multi-attribute regression transform was selected. The high level of correlation (90 %) with the actual and derived porosity indicates that the seismic multi-attributes were reliably transformed to the reservoir porosity log. The derived porosity map for the Runaway Formation indicates high lithological variation within the reservoir level with a porosity generally varying between 2 and 32 %. The western portion of the Runaway Formation is highly porous and can be considered for future exploration purposes. Although this study retains a certain level of uncertainty, which can be attributed to the well and seismic data used, due to data limitations, uncertainty analysis was not included in the current study, but this should be considered in future studies so as to improve the porosity prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calderon J, Castagna J (2007) Porosity and lithologic estimation using rock physics and multi-attribute transforms in Balcon Field, Colombia. Lead Edge 26(2):142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RL, Yarus JM (2002) Quantitative use of seismic attributes for reservoir characterization. CSEG Rec 27(6):14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Marfurt K (2006) Seismic attributes—a promising aid for geologic prediction. CSEG Rec 31:110–120

  • Cooke D, Sena A, Mauko G, Muryanto T, Ball V (1999) What is the best seismic attribute for quantitative seismic reservoir characterization? Annual Meeting Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Tulsa: SEG pp. 1588–1591

  • Dumitrescu CC, Lines L (2008) Seismic attributes used for reservoir simulation—application to a heavy oil reservoir in Canada. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 27(1):1471–1475

  • Flippin JW (1982) The stratigraphy, structure, and economic aspects of the Paleozoic strata in Erath County, north-central Texas. In: Martin CA (ed) Petroleum geology of the Fort Worth Basin and Bend Arch Area. Dallas Geological Society, 129–155

  • Guerrero JG, Vargas CA, Montes LA (2010) Reservoir characterization by multiattribute analysis: The Orito field case. Earth Sci Res J 14(2):173–180

  • Hardage BA, Carr DL, Lancaster DE, Simmons JL, Elphick RY, Pendleton VM, Johns RA (1996a) 3-D seismic evidence of the effects of carbonate karst collapse on overlying clastic stratigraphy and reservoir compartmentalization. Geophysics 61(5):1336–1350. doi:10.1190/1.1444057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardage BA, Simmons JL Jr, Lancaster DE, Elphick RY, Edson RD, Carr DL (1996) Boonsville 3-D seismic data set: a technology transfer product generated as part of the Secondary Gas Recovery Project: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, supported bt the Gas Research Institute, U.S. Department of Energy, and the State of Texas, GRI-96/0182, 40 p. + 2 disks, 1 tape

  • Hentz TF, Ambrose WA, Carr DL (2012) Reservoir systems of the Pennsylvanian lower Atoka Group (Bend Conglomerate), northern Fort Worth Basin, Texas: high-resolution facies distribution, structural controls on sedimentation, and production trends. AAPG Bull 96(7):1301–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerans C (1988) Karst-controlled reservoir heterogeneity in Ellenburger Group carbonates of West Texas. AAPG Bull 7:1160–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti VR, Huber WF (1982) The Atoka Group (Pennsylvanian) of the Boonsville field area, north-central Texas: Petroleum Geology of the Fort Worth Basin and Bend arch area, edited by Martin CA, Dallas Geological Society, 377–399

  • Li J, Wang H, Yang S, Yang J (2008) An integrated approach for 3D seismic-based reservoir characterization: an example of northern Chezhen Sag, Shengli Oilfield. SEG Annual Meeting (Las Vegas, 2008), 1580–1584

  • Maharaj VT, Wood LJ (2009) A quantitative paleogeographic study of the fluvio-deltaic reservoirs in the Atoka interval, Fort Worth Basin, Texas, U.S.A. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 59:495–509

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell A, Loucks RG, Dooley T (2007) Quantifying the origin and geometry of circular sag structures in northern Fort Worth Basin, Texas: Paleocave collapse, pull-apart fault systems, or hydrothermal alteration? AAPG Bull 91(9):1295–1318

  • Ng DTW (1979) Subsurface study of Atoka (Lower Pennsylvanian) clastic rocks in parts of Jack, Palo Pinto, Parker, and Wise counties, north-central Texas. AAPG Bull 63(1):50–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1988) Introduction to seismic inversion methods: SEG Continuing Education Course Note Series, Vol. 2, Soc Expl Geophys

  • Russell B, Hampson D, Todorov T, Lines L (2002) Combining geostatistics and multi-attribute transforms: a channel sand case study, Blackfoot oilfield (Alberta). J Pet Geol 25(1):97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloss LL (1976) Areas and volumes of cratonic sediments, western North America and eastern Europe. Geology 4:272–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taner MT (1992, May 2003) Attribute Revisited Retrieved 19 August 2013, from http://www.rocksolidimages.com/pdf/attrib_revisited.htm

  • Thompson DM (1988) Fort Worth Basin. In: Sloss LL (ed) Sedimentary cover—NorthAmerican Craton. U.S.: Geological Society of America, Decade of North American Geology Series, v. D-2, 347–352

  • Veeken PCH, Silva MD (2004) Seismic inversion methods and some of their constraints. First Break 22(6):47–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls J, Dvorkin J, Carr M (2004) Well logs and rock physics in seismic reservoir characterization: Offshore Technology Conference, Paper Number 16921

  • Walper JL (1982) Plate tectonic evolution of the Fort Worth Basin. In: Martin CA (ed) Petroleum geology of the Fort Worth Basin and Bend Arch area: Dallas Geological Society, 237–251

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank to Dr. Abdullah Al-amri, Chairman of the Geology and Geophysics Department, King Saud University, for his continuous help and guidance to complete this research work. Special thanks go to King Saud University for providing the author a prestigious scholarship to study Master Degree in Saudi Arabia. Many thanks to all the faculty members of the Department of Geology and Geophysics for their kind guidance and moral support during the project work. The author would like to extend his appreciation to Dr. Khalil of the King Abdulaziz University for his critical review of the manuscript. Special acknowledgement goes to the Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, for providing the dataset, which has been used during this research project. Additionally, the author acknowledges the CGG for providing the Hampson-Russell Software license.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Naeem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naeem, M., El-Araby, H.M., Khalil, M.K. et al. Integrated study of seismic and well data for porosity estimation using multi-attribute transforms: a case study of Boonsville Field, Fort Worth Basin, Texas, USA. Arab J Geosci 8, 8777–8793 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1806-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1806-7

Keywords

Navigation