Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic imaging of mud volcano boundary in the east of Caspian Sea by common diffraction surface stack method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of seismic imaging in complex structures such as folded faulting areas, salt domes, or mud volcano-bearing areas cannot be properly solved by the conventional seismic processing methods. The reverse time migration, Gaussian beam migration, the extended search strategy in the optimized common reflection surface (CRS) stack, and the partial CRS stack methods are among the new methods introduced for seismic imaging in complex structures. Among them, the CRS stack method is frequently used for seismic imaging. However, besides its great advantage in enhancing the quality of seismic section, it faces with some problem in imaging of complex structures, especially in the existence of conflicting dips. The CRS method transforms pre-processed multi-coverage data into a zero-offset section by summing along stacking surfaces instead of only along a common reflection point trajectory. The extended parameter search strategy in the CRS method and the partial CRS stack method were introduced to solve the problem of conflicting dips in the CRS method. However, some examples showed that these methods could not completely solve the problem of conflicting dips. In this study, a new introduced method is used to completely solve the problem of conflicting dips in complex structures. The new stacking surface is the approximation of diffraction response of a diffraction point. The surface is made by well-known three CRS attributes, where the radius of normal and normal incidence point waves is equals. The third parameter is the emergence angle of the central ray that the stacking surface is built for each angle, thus making an operator volume. Therefore, the operator gathers more energy that might get lost by other stacking surfaces. The new method was applied on a seismic data from a complex geological structure from northeast of Iran. This area contains mud volcano, an indicator for gas reservoir. Mud also absorbs the seismic energy and deteriorates the quality of the seismic section. Therefore, imaging the boundary of the mud volcano is questionable. By applying post-stack time migration on the stacked section obtained by the new method, the advantage of the stacking operator has been evaluated for imaging in complex structures. These advantages were more highlighted in depth migration applied on the new introduced operator volume common diffraction surface (CDS)-stacked section. The results showed that not only the boundary of the mud but also the faults that were completely unclear in previous results were imaged well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaei B (2006) An integrated procedure for migration velocity analysis in complex structures of thrust belts. J Appl Geophys 59:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykulov M (2009) Seismic imaging in complex media with the Common Reflection Surface stack. Ph. D Thesis, Hamburg University

  • Baykulov M, Gajewski D (2009) Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack. Geophysics 74:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykulov M, Dummong S, Gajewski D (2011) From time to depth with CRS attributes. Geophysics 76:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysal E, Kosloff DD, Sherwood JWC (1983) Reverse time migration. Geophysics 48:1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch A, Belfer I, Landa E (2008) Multifocusing as a method of improving subsurface imaging. Lead Edge 27:250–256. doi:10.1190/1.2840374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi B (2006) 3D Seismic Imaging. Investigations in Geophysics. 14, SEG, Tulsa

  • Bishop TN, Bube KP, Cutler RT, Langan RT, Love PL, Resnick JR, Shrey RT, Spindler DA, Wyld HW (1985) Tomographic determination of velocity and depth in laterally varying media. Geophysics 50:903–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bazelaire E (1986) Normal moveout revisited—inhomogeneous media and curved interfaces: 56th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys. Expanded Abstracts, Session: POS2.4

  • de Bazelaire E (1988) Normal moveout revisited—inhomogeneous media and curved interfaces. Geophysics 53:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bazelaire E, Thore P (1987) Pattern recognition applied to time and velocity contours. 57th Annual Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, Session: POS2.14

  • Dong L, Zhenchun L, Xiaodong S, Ning Q, and Xuefeng Z (2010) Prestack Seismic Data Enhancement with the Common-Offset Common Reflection Surface (CO CRS) Stack. 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI

  • Duveneck E (2004) Velocity model estimation with data-derived wavefront attributes. Geophysics 69:265–274. doi:10.1190/1.1649394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faye JP, Jeannot JP (1986) Pre-stack migration velocities from focusing depth analysis. 56th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys. Expanded abstract, 438–440

  • Garabito G, Oliva PC, Cruz JCR (2011) Numerical analysis of the finite-offset common-reflection-surface traveltime approximations. J Appl Geophys 74:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garabito G, Stoffa PL, Ferreira CASC, Cruz JCR (2012) Part II—CRS-beam PSDM: Kirchhoff-beam prestack depth migration using the 2D CRS stacking operator. J Appl Geophys 85:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray S, Zhou H, Pham D (2004) A strategy for using several reflection tomography methods in combination. Estimation of Accurate Velocity Macro Models in Complex Structures EAGE 66th Conference, Paris

  • Höcht G, de Bazelaire E, Majer P, Hubral P (1999) Seismics and optics: hyperbolae and curvatures. J Appl Geophys 42:261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubral P (1983) Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth. Geophysics 48:1051–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubral P (1999) Macro-model independent seismic reflection imaging. J Appl Geophys 42:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubral P, Krey T (1980) Interval velocities from seismic reflection traveltime measurements. Soc. Expl. Geophys

  • Jäger R (1999) The common reflection surface stack: theory and application. Diploma thesis, University of Karlsruhe

  • Jäger R, Mann J, Höcht G, Hubral P (2001) Common-reflection-surface stack: image and attributes. Geophysics 66:97–109. doi:10.1190/1.1444927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karazincir MH, Gerrard CM (2006) Explicit high order reverse time pre-stack depth migration. Expanded Abstracts, SEG, 2353–2357

  • Landa E, Gurevich B, Keydar S, Trachtman P (1999) Application of multifocusing method for subsurface imaging. J Appl Geophys 42:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite LWB, Lima HM, Heilmann BZ, Mann J (2010) CRS-based Seismic Imaging in Complex Marine Geology, 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, P396

  • Mann J (1998) Image Wave Theory and its application to seismic reflection data. Logos, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann J (2002) Extensions and applications of the common-reflection-surface stack method. Logos Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann J, Jäger R, Müller T, Höcht G, Hubral P (1999) Common-reflection-surface stack: a real data example. J Appl Geophys 42:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann J, Schleicher J, Hertweck T (2007) CRS stacking; a simplified explanation. EAGE 69th Conference & Technical Exhibition, London

  • Mark B, Allen MB, Stephen J, Vincent G, Alsop I, Ismail-zadeh A, Flecker R (2003) Late Cenozoic deformation in the South Caspian region: effects of a rigid basement block within a collision zone. Tectonophysics 366:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menyoli E, Gajewski D, Huebscher C (2004) Imaging of complex basin structure with common reflection surface (CRS) stack method. Geophys J Int 157:1206–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller T (1998) Common Reflection Surface stack versus NMO/stack and NMO/DMO/stack. Extended abstracts, 60th Conf. Eur. Assn. Geosci. Eng. Session 1–20

  • Pruessmann J, Frehers S, Ballesteros R, Caballero A, Clemente G (2008) CRS based depth model building and imaging of 3D seismic data from the Gulf of Mexico Coast. Geophysics 73:303–311. doi:10.1190/1.2968691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robein E (2003) Velocities, time imaging and depth imaging in reflection seismic. EAGE Publications

  • Shahsavani H, Mann J, Piruz I, Hubral P (2011) A model-based approach to the common-diffraction-surface stack—theory and synthetic case study. J Seism Explor 20:289–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani M (2009) Common Diffraction Surface (CDS) stack; a new approach for solving the problem of conflicting dips. Ph. D. Thesis, (in English) Shahrood University of Technology

  • Soleimani M, Mann J (2008) Merging aspects of DMO correction and CRS stack to account for conflicting dip situations. Annual WIT Report 2008:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani M, Mann J, Adibi E, Shahsavani M, Piruz I (2010) Applying the CRS stack method to solve the problem of imaging of complex structures in the Zagros overthrust, south west Iran. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition. Barcelona, Spain, p556

  • Soleimani M, Adibi E, and Juergen Mann (2011) Imaging in complex structures by post-stack time migration and CRS stack. 12th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society(SBGf)

  • Thore P, de Bazelaire E (1991) Analysis of the common midpoint gather by decomposition into elementary wave fronts. Geophysal Prospecting 39:453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Bao-shu Chen BS, Wang XJ, Yang XJ, Liu JR (2012) Handling dip discrimination phenomenon in common-reflection-surface stack via combination of output-imaging-scheme and migration/demigration. Geophysical Prospecting 60:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz O 2001 Seismic data analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists I

  • Zhang Y, Bergler S, Hubral P (2001) Common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack for common offset. Geophysical Prospecting 49:709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Soleimani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleimani, M. Seismic imaging of mud volcano boundary in the east of Caspian Sea by common diffraction surface stack method. Arab J Geosci 8, 3943–3958 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1497-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1497-5

Keywords

Navigation