Skip to main content
Log in

Remediation and mitigation strategies for rock fall hazards along the highways of Fayfa Mountain, Jazan Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rock fall hazard rating study was conducted along the roads of Fayfa Mountain in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to determine hazardous zones and to specify remediation and/or mitigation measures to improve the safety of the steep mountain roads. The mountain consists mainly of a weathered and/or fractured syenite core draped with slate, phylitic, and amphibolite rocks around the lower periphery of the mountain. Overall slopes on this mountain have an average range between 38 and 45°, with rock cuts typically 30–40-m high in places. High-value properties dot these mountain roads, and when roads are closed because of rock fall, there is significant personal and economic disruption in the area. This study was concluded in 2011, and rock fall hazards were indentified and classified according to relative hazard (likelihood of rock fall) and relative consequence (consequence of rock fall). For this purpose, the Saudi Arabia Rock Fall Hazard Rating System was developed based on existing rating systems. In addition, remediation and mitigation measures were prescribed for each identified hazardous section. Specified solutions were geared to minimize cost and to make use of local expertise and available equipment. The suggested remediation solutions are scaling of loose rock (both manual and mechanical), mechanically reshaping the slope (to remove overhangs and remove protrusions that serve to increase the horizontal velocity of bouncing and rolling rock), increasing the ditch capacity by deepening and widening the ditch (often by cutting back the lower portion of the slope), or by installing jersey barriers on the down gradient side of the ditch, using locally built stone retaining walls to stabilize the lower section of slopes and using gabion and large block barriers to stabilize small debris flow channels. In a small number of cuts, trim blasting and creating benches were specified. Some solutions were not considered due to high cost or due to the concern that local contractors could not implement them effectively. These included anchoring systems, advanced walls such as sheet pile and anchored retaining walls, draped mesh, and sacrificial fences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellamy D, Bateman N, Drum Eric C, Dunnne WM, Vandewater C, Mauldon M, Rose B (2003) Electronic data collection for rock analysis. Transportation Research Board, 82nd Annual Meeting: Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003, 11 pp

  • Brawner CO (1994) Participant workbook for rockfall hazard mitigation methods. U.S. Department of Transportation, NHI Course No. 13219

  • Fairer GM (1981) Reconnaissance geology of the Jabal Fayfa quadrangle, sheet 17/43C, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources Open – File Report USGS – OF – 02 – 87, no text scale 1:100,000

  • Fairer GM (1985) Explanatory notes to the geology of the Wadi Baysh quadrangle, sheet 17F. Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish M, Lane R (2002) Linking New Hampshire’s rock cut management system with a geographic information system, Transportation Research Record, 1786, Paper number 02–2775

  • Franklin JA, Senior, SA (1997) Rock fall hazards—strategies for detection, assessment, and remediation: Proceedings International Symposium on Engineering Geology and The Environment, Athens, Greece, pp 657–663

  • Hadjin DJ (2002) New York State Department of Transportation rock slope rating procedure and rockfall assessment, Transportation Research Record, 1786, Paper number 02–3978

  • Ho CL, Norton SS (1991) Development of an Unstable Slope Management System, Washington State Department of Transportation. Report WA-RD 270.1

  • Hoek E, Bray JW (1981) Rock slope engineering, 3rd edn. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 358 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebl J, Fiebiger G (2005) Debris flow mitigation measures. Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena, Matthias and Hung (Eds). Springer, Berlin, pp 445–488

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kliche CA (1999) Rock slope stability. Society for mining, metallurgy, and exploration. Littleton CO, 253 pp

  • Maerz NH, Youssef A, Lauer R (2004) MORFH RS: A rockcut rating system for Missouri highways. 55th Highway Geology Symposium, Kansas City, Missouri, Sep. 7–10, 2004, pp 406–424

  • Maerz NH, Youssef A, Fennessey TW (2005) New risk-consequence rockfall hazard rating system for Missouri highways using digital image analysis. Environ Eng Geosci 11:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack R, Boie K, Mather S, Farrell J (2006) UDOT rockfall hazard rating system: final report and user’s manual (Report UT-06.07). Utah State University, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson LA, Van Vickle R (1993) Rock fall hazard rating system—participants’ manual: FHWA report–FHWA-SA-93-057, 102 pp

  • Piteau DR (1979) Rock slope stabilization, protection and warning-instrumentation measures and related construction considerations. Part E, Rock Slope Engineering Reference Manual: FHWA Report–FHWA-TS-79-208

  • Ritchie AM (1963) Evaluation of rock fall and its control. Highw Res Rec 17:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, Christopher PR, Jerry DH, Jessica IS (2009) Modification and statistical analysis of the Colorado Rockfall Hazard Rating System. Eng Geol 104:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewater CD (2005) Classifying and assessing the geologic contribution to rockfall hazard. Environ Eng Geosci 11:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie DC, Mah CW (2004) Rock slope engineering, 4th edn. Spon Press, London, 431 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie DC, Norrish NI (1996) Stabilization of rock slopes. Landslides investigation and mitigation, Keith Turner and Robert Schuster Ed., Transportation Research Board Special Report 247, pp. 474–506

  • Youssef AM, Maerz NH (2012) Development, justification and verification of a rock fall hazard rating system. Bull Eng Geol Environ 7:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef A, Maerz NH, Fritz MA (2003) A risk-consequence rockfall hazard rating system for Missouri highways. 54th Highway Geology Symposium, Burlington, Vermont, Sep. 24–26, 2003, pp 175–195

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support offered by the Saudi Geological Survey for this work. We also wish to express our sincere appreciation to the Saudi Geological Survey personnel, specifically Mr. Saleh Sefry, the director of the Applied Geology Division and Mr. Hassan Al-Harbi, the head of Geological Hazard Department for their support and assistance during the time of the project. Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable inputs which helped us to revise the earlier version of the mansucript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswajeet Pradhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maerz, N.H., Youssef, A.M., Pradhan, B. et al. Remediation and mitigation strategies for rock fall hazards along the highways of Fayfa Mountain, Jazan Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 8, 2633–2651 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1423-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1423-x

Keywords

Navigation