Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The groundwater vulnerability has become a major problem in most of the countries which are growing at a faster pace. The DRASTIC model is the most widely adopted method to assess the groundwater vulnerability to contamination in most studies and has also been implemented in the present study which has been conducted in a small watershed of Palamu, Jharkhand, India. The study showed that the DRASTIC index lies in the range of 79 to 160 which were classified into four zones, viz., low-, moderate-, high-, and very high-risk zone of groundwater contamination. The groundwater vulnerability map showed that about 31 and 24 % of the study area lie between high risk to very high risk of groundwater pollution and 16 and 28 % of the study area are occupied by moderate risk to low risk of pollution zone, respectively. The use of Geographic Information System (GIS) facilitated the preparation of the thematic layers to be overlaid in the GIS environment to obtain the risk zones spatially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi S, Mohammadi K, Kholghi MK, Howard K (2013) Aquifer vulnerability assessments using DRASTIC, weights of evidence and the analytic element method. Hydrol Sci J 58(1):186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Hallaq AH, Abu Elaish BS (2011) Determination of groundwater vulnerability zones to contamination in khanyounis governorate, Gaza strip, using the DRASTIC model within GIS. J Soc Sci 4(1):9–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Hallaq AH, Abu Elaish BS (2012) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khanyounis Governorate, Gaza Strip—Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arab J Geosci 5:833–847. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam F, Umar R, Ahmed S, Dar FA (2012) A new model (DRASTIC-LU) for evaluating groundwater vulnerability in parts of central Ganga Plain, India. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0796-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ (1985) DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. NWWA/EPA Series EPA-600/2–85/018

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty R, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydro-geological setting. EPA 600/2–87–035:622

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan S, Nair AM (2004) Geographic information system and groundwater quality mapping in Panvel Basin, Maharashtra, India. Environ Geol 45(6):753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha H (2006) Vulnerability assessment for Gaza strip Palestine using DRASTIC. Environ Geol 50:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalousha HM (2011) Mapping groundwater contamination risk using GIS and groundwater modelling. A case study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Arab J Geosci 4:483–494. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0135-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babikeri IS et al (2005) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamlgahara Heights, Glfu Prefecture, Central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DB (1990) Groundwater quality assessment through cooperative private well testing: an Ohio example. J Soil Water Conserv 45:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodier MW, Frank KD, Spalding RF (1993) Nitrate-N movement in a fine textured vadose zone. J Soil Water Conserv 48:350–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughriba M, Barkaoui A, Zarhloule Y, Lahmer Z, Houadi BE, Verdoya M (2010) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Angad transboundary aquifer using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment. Arab J Geosci 3:207–220. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0072-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breabăn IG, Paiu M (2012) Application of drastic model and GIS for evaluation of aquifer vulnerability: study case Barlad City area. Water resources and wetlands, Conference Proceedings, Tulcea—Romania, ISBN: 978-606-605-038-8, pp 588–593

  • Burchat A et al (2006) Mapping the groundwater vulnerability in North Rhine–Westphaline, Germany. Environ Eng Sci 23:574–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitsazan M, Akhtari Y (2009) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran. Water Resour Manag 23(6):1137–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ckakraborty S, Paul PK, Sikdar PK (2007) Assessing aquifer vulnerability to arsenic pollution using DRASTIC and GIS of North Bengal plain: a case study of English Bazar Block, Malda District, West Bengal, India. J Spat Hydrol 7(1):101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • De Silva CS, Hohne S (2005) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and protection measures—an example from Sweden. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka 34:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • El Naqa A (2004) Aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC index at Russeifa landfill northeast Jordan. Environ Geol 47:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J (1995) Comparison of sampling schemes in constructing DTMs from topographic maps. ITC J 1:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammouri N, El-Naqa A (2008) GIS based hydrogeological vulnerability mapping of groundwater resources in Jerash Area-Jordan. Geofísica internacional [Int Geophys] 47(2):85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasrotia AS, Singh R (2005) Groundwater pollution vulnerability using the drastic model in a GIS environment, Devak-Rui watersheds, India. J Environ Hydrol 13:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Peiffer S (2006) Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS technologies in groundwater hydrology: past, present and future. Bayreuth University Press, Bayreuth

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Sebastian J (2005) Vulnerability study of pollution upon shallow groundwater using Drastic/GIS. A paper presented in the 8th Annual International Conference and Exhibition in India, Map India. Geomatics, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Chowdhury A, Chowdary VM, Peiffer P (2007) Groundwater management and development by integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems: prospects and constraints. Water Resour Manag 21:427–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic NZ, Adams S, Thomas A, Fey M, Beekman HE, Campbell R, Saayman I, Conrad J (2006) Improved DRASTIC method for assessment of groundwater vulnerability to generic aqueousphase contaminants. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 92:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YJ, Hamm SY (1999) Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 7(2):227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masetti M et al (2008) Spatial and statistical assessment of factors influencing nitrate contamination in groundwater. J Environ Manag 86:272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant J (1994) GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(9):1117–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Muheeb MA, Jaradat RA (2010) Evaluation of aquifers vulnerability to contamination in the Yarmouk River basin, Jordan, based on DRASTIC method. Arab J Geosci 3:273–282. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0074-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nageswara RK, Narendra K (2006) Mapping and evaluation of urban sprawling in the Mahadrigedda watershed in Vishakhapatnam metropolitan region using RS and GIS. Curr Sci 91:1552–1557

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single parameter sensibility analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Proceedings of the HydrolGIS application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management. IAHS, Vienna, pp 559–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad RK, Singh VS, Krishnamacharyulu SKG, Banerjee P (2010) Application of drastic model and GIS: for assessing vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer. Environ Monit Assess 176:143–155. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1572-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A (2007) A GIS based model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28(1):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28(1):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission Atlas (2005) Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission Atlas for Jharkhand State, vol I & II. National Remote Sensing Agency, Department of Space, Govt. of India, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao SM, Mamatha P (2004) Water quality in sustainable water management. Curr Sci 87(7):942–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao YS, Reddy TVK, Nayudu PT (1997) Groundwater quality in the Niva River basin, Chitoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 32(1):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert MG (2001) Calibration of the DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping method. Ground Water 39:625–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samey AA, Gang C (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in West Mitidja: Blida City, Algeria. J Appl Sci 3(7):500–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Saro L (2003) Evaluation of waste disposal site using the DRASTIC system in the Southern Korea. Environ Geol 44:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secunda S, Collin M, Melloul AJ (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manag 54:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid S, Hazarika MK (2007) Geographic information system for the evaluation of groundwater pollution vulnerability of the Northwestern Barind tract of Bangladesh. Environ Res J 1(1–4):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S (2012) GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a review. J sRisk Res 15(8):991–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedema LK, Rycroft DW (1983) Land drainage: planning and design of Agricultural Drainage Systems. Batsford, London, p 376

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovar M, Rodriguez R (2004) Vulnerability assessment of aquifers in an urban–rural environment and territorial ordering in Leon, Mexico. Geofis Int 43(4):603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2007) Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Landfill Leachate Induced Arsenic Contamination in Maine, US—Intro GIS Term Project Final Report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

  • Wen X, Wu J, Si J (2009) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing shallow groundwater vulnerability in the Zhangy Basin, north western China. Environ Geol 57(6):1435–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to the Central Ground Water Board for providing the weathered zone thickness data and to the Indian Meteorological Department for providing the rainfall data for the study area. Authors (SS and AST) acknowledge the financial assistance under the UGC Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shekhar, S., Pandey, A.C. & Tirkey, A.S. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer. Arab J Geosci 8, 1385–1401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1285-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1285-2

Keywords

Navigation