Abstract
Earth dam site selection is one of the most important problems in water resources management. It depends on a set of qualitative and quantitative criteria, and they may even be in conflict with each other. This study aims to develop a multicriteria decision-making approach to locate the dam site and construct a multipurpose earth dam in Harsin City at the western part of Iran. For this purpose, firstly, the influential criteria for locating the earth dam site were determined using a comprehensive literature review and the experts’ opinions. Then, some watersheds in the surrounding areas of Iran’s Harsin City were studied and four feasible sites proposed. In the final stage, these sites, in order to construct a multipurpose earth dam, were prioritized using the analytic hierarchy process approach and the most optimal site was selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 131:326–335
Ahmed SA, Tewfik SR, Talaa HA (2002) Development and verification of a decision support system for the selection of optimum water reuse schemes. Desalination 152:339–352
Anand Raj PA, Kumar DN (1996) Ranking of river basin alternatives using ELECTRE. Hydrolog Sci J 41:697–713
Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman N (1966) Manual de reference du programme electre. Note De Synthese et Formaton, no. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, France
Bojan S (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238
Cai X, Lasdon L, Michelsen AM (2004) Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 130:4–14
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York
Choi DJ, Park H (2001) Analysis of water privatization scenarios in Korea with multicriteria decision making techniques. J Water Supply Res T-AQUA 50:335–352
Chuntian C, Chau KW (2002) Decision aiding three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control. Eur J Oper Res 142:625–631
Cooper WW, Sieford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1:1–24
Despic O, Simonovic SP (2000) Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:11–33
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin
Hyde KM, Maier HR, Colby CB (2005) A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making. J Environ Manage 77:278–290
Janssen R (1996) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Kheireldin K, Fahmy H (2001) Multi-criteria approach for evaluating long term water strategies. Water Int 26:527–535
Limon GA, Martinez Y (2006) Multi-criteria modeling of irrigation water market at basin level: a Spanish case study. Eur J Oper Res 173:313–336
Marianna G, Laia F-M, Alessandra B, Simona T (2011) Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manage 92:665–675
Montazar A, Behbahani SM (2007) Development of an optimized irrigation system selection model using analytical hierarchy process. Biosyst Eng 98:155–165
Montazar A, Zadbagher E (2010) An analytical hierarchy model for assessing global water productivity of irrigation networks in Iran. Water Resour Manag 24:2817–2832
Nitirach S, Vilas N (2011) Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: a case from Thailand. Desalination 268:141–149
Opricovic S (1998) Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17:211–220
Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Enrg Rev 8:365–381
Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples: la methode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75
Roy B (1978) ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférencesen présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO 20:3–24
Roy B, Bertier P (1973) La methode Electre II: Une application au media-planing. In: Ross M (ed) VIIeme Conference Internationale de Recherche Operationnelle, Dublin, OR72, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 291–302
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Safari M, Ataei M, Khalokakaie R, Karamozian M (2010) Mineral processing plant location using the analytic hierarchy process—a case study: the Sangan iron ore mine (phase 1). Min Sci Technol 20:0691–0695
Stefan H, Andrew H (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184:255–265
Weng SQ, Huang GH, Li YP (2010) An integrated scenario-based multi-criteria decision support system for water resources anagement and planning—a case study in the Haihe River Basin. Expert Syst Appl 37:8242–8254
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their valuable and useful comments and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank Pandam Consulting Engineers Company and Kermanshah Regional Water Company for providing practical information and data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yasser, M., Jahangir, K. & Mohmmad, A. Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in the west of Iran. Arab J Geosci 6, 3417–3426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x