Skip to main content
Log in

Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in the west of Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earth dam site selection is one of the most important problems in water resources management. It depends on a set of qualitative and quantitative criteria, and they may even be in conflict with each other. This study aims to develop a multicriteria decision-making approach to locate the dam site and construct a multipurpose earth dam in Harsin City at the western part of Iran. For this purpose, firstly, the influential criteria for locating the earth dam site were determined using a comprehensive literature review and the experts’ opinions. Then, some watersheds in the surrounding areas of Iran’s Harsin City were studied and four feasible sites proposed. In the final stage, these sites, in order to construct a multipurpose earth dam, were prioritized using the analytic hierarchy process approach and the most optimal site was selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 131:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SA, Tewfik SR, Talaa HA (2002) Development and verification of a decision support system for the selection of optimum water reuse schemes. Desalination 152:339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand Raj PA, Kumar DN (1996) Ranking of river basin alternatives using ELECTRE. Hydrolog Sci J 41:697–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman N (1966) Manual de reference du programme electre. Note De Synthese et Formaton, no. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris, France

  • Bojan S (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42:2261–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Lasdon L, Michelsen AM (2004) Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 130:4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi DJ, Park H (2001) Analysis of water privatization scenarios in Korea with multicriteria decision making techniques. J Water Supply Res T-AQUA 50:335–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuntian C, Chau KW (2002) Decision aiding three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control. Eur J Oper Res 142:625–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Sieford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Despic O, Simonovic SP (2000) Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KM, Maier HR, Colby CB (2005) A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making. J Environ Manage 77:278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R (1996) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheireldin K, Fahmy H (2001) Multi-criteria approach for evaluating long term water strategies. Water Int 26:527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limon GA, Martinez Y (2006) Multi-criteria modeling of irrigation water market at basin level: a Spanish case study. Eur J Oper Res 173:313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianna G, Laia F-M, Alessandra B, Simona T (2011) Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manage 92:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montazar A, Behbahani SM (2007) Development of an optimized irrigation system selection model using analytical hierarchy process. Biosyst Eng 98:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montazar A, Zadbagher E (2010) An analytical hierarchy model for assessing global water productivity of irrigation networks in Iran. Water Resour Manag 24:2817–2832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitirach S, Vilas N (2011) Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: a case from Thailand. Desalination 268:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (1998) Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Enrg Rev 8:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples: la methode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1978) ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférencesen présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du CERO 20:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B, Bertier P (1973) La methode Electre II: Une application au media-planing. In: Ross M (ed) VIIeme Conference Internationale de Recherche Operationnelle, Dublin, OR72, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 291–302

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Safari M, Ataei M, Khalokakaie R, Karamozian M (2010) Mineral processing plant location using the analytic hierarchy process—a case study: the Sangan iron ore mine (phase 1). Min Sci Technol 20:0691–0695

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefan H, Andrew H (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng SQ, Huang GH, Li YP (2010) An integrated scenario-based multi-criteria decision support system for water resources anagement and planning—a case study in the Haihe River Basin. Expert Syst Appl 37:8242–8254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their valuable and useful comments and suggestions. The authors would also like to thank Pandam Consulting Engineers Company and Kermanshah Regional Water Company for providing practical information and data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ataei Mohmmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yasser, M., Jahangir, K. & Mohmmad, A. Earth dam site selection using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study in the west of Iran. Arab J Geosci 6, 3417–3426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0602-x

Keywords

Navigation