Abstract
Transit agencies implement limited-stop (express) bus services as a mean to provide an attractive and competitive transit service. The Société de transport de Montréal (STM), the transit agency providing service on the Island of Montréal, Canada, implemented a limited-stop service to run parallel to route 67 Saint-Michel, a heavily used bus route. The design process regarding which stops to include in the new service involved an evaluation of several scenarios and an estimation of running time savings. In this paper, we use archived vehicle location and passenger count data to measure changes in on-time performance and running times, and to compare these changes to previous estimates through a before-and-after study. In addition, an on-site survey is conducted to measure the riders’ perception of time savings. Implementing a limited-stop service yielded to 4.6 minutes savings in running time for the new limited service; meanwhile, the existing regular service experienced an increase of 0.8 minute in average running time, an increase that could be due to a new smart card system introduced in the same period. The running time savings for the limited-stop service fall in the expected estimates made by the research team, which strengthens our trust in the methodology used to select stops and to estimate savings. Finally, the study shows that riders are generally satisfied with the new service. They also tend to overestimate the savings associated with the implementation of the new limited-stop service by 4 to 7 minutes more than the actual savings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abkowitz M, Engelstein I (1983) Factors affecting running time on transit routes. Transp Res Part A 17(2):107–113
Abkowitz M, Tozzi J (1987) Research contributing to managing transit service reliability. J Adv Transp 21:47–65
Agence métropolitaine de transport (2003) Enquête origine-destination 2003. Montréal, QC
Berkow M, El-Geneidy A, Bertini R (2009) Beyond generating transit performance measures: visualizations and statistical analysis using historical data. Paper presented at the Transportation research board 88th annual meeting, Washington DC
Bertini R, El-Geneidy A (2004) Modeling schedule recovery processes in transit operations for bus arrival time prediction. J Transp Eng 130(1):56–67
Conlon M, Foote P, O’Malley K, Stuart D (2001) Successful arterial street limited-stop express bus service in Chicago. Transp Res Rec 1760:74–80
Crout DT (2007) Accuracy and precision of TriMet’s Transit Tracker system. Paper presented at the Transportation research board 86th annual meeting
Dueker KJ, Kimpel TJ, Strathman JG, Callas S (2004) Determinants of bus dwell time. J Public Transp 7(1):21–40
El-Geneidy A, Strathman J, Kimpel T, Crout D (2006) The effects of bus stop consolidation on passenger activity and transit operations. Transp Res Rec 1971:32–41
Environment Canada (2008) Climate data online. Retrieved June 16, 2008, from http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climateData/canada_e.html
Ercolano JM (1984) Limited-stop bus operations: an evaluation. Transp Res Rec 994:24–29
Furth P (2006) Using archived AVL-APC data to improve transit performance and management. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Furth P, Day B (1985) Transit routing and scheduling strategies for heavy demand corridors. Transp Res Rec 1011:23–26
Furth P, Hemily B, Muller T, Strathman J (2003) Uses of archived AVL-APC data to improve transit performance and management: review and potential (TCRP Web Document No. H-28). Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
Furth P, Muller T (2007) Service reliability and optimal running time schedules. Paper presented at the Transportation research board 86th annual meeting
Guenthner RP, Sinha KC (1983) Modeling bus delays due to passengers boardings and alightings. Transp Res Rec 915:7–13
Hensher DA, Stopher P, Bullock P (2003) Service quality-developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transp Res Part A 37:499–517
Kimpel T, Strathman J, Bertini R, Bender P, Callas S (2004) Analysis of transit signal priority using archived TriMet bus dispatch system data. Paper presented at the 84th transportation research board annual meeting, Washington DC
Levinson H (1983a) Analyzing transit travel time performance. Transp Res Rec 915:1–6
Murray A, Wu X (2003) Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning. J Geogr Syst 5(1):93–107
Schweiger CL (2003) Real-time bus arrival information systems. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Silverman N, Orosz T, Zicklin A (1998) Practitioner’s forum: limited-stop bus service at New York city transit. J Transp Eng 124(6):503–509
Société de Transport de Montréal (2009) Un service de bus plus rapide et compétitif grâce à la création de la ligne 467 express Saint-Michel et à l’implantation de mesures prioritaires. Retrieved March 22, 2009, from http://www.stm.info/info/comm-09/co090319b.htm
Strathman JG (2002) Tri-Met’s experience with automatic passenger counter and automatic vehicle location systems. Center for Urban Studies, Portland State University, Portland
Strathman JG, Dueker KJ, Kimpel TJ, Gerhart RL, Callas S (2002) Evaluation of transit operations: data applications of Tri-Met’s automated bus dispatching system. Transportation 29:321–345
Strathman JG, Dueker KJ, Kimpel TJ, Gerhart RL, Turner K, Taylor P et al. (2000) Service reliability impacts of computer-aided dispatching and automatic location technology: a Tri-Met case study. Transp Q 54(3):85–102
Strathman JG, Hopper J (1993) Empirical analysis of bus transit on-time performance. Transp Res Part A 27(2):93–100
Tétreault P, El-Geneidy A (2010) Estimating bus run times for new limited-stop service using archived AVL and APC data. Transp Res Part A 44(6):390–402
Vuchic V (2005) Urban transit: operations, planning and economics. Wiley, Indianapolis
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El-Geneidy, A.M., Surprenant-Legault, J. Limited-stop bus service: an evaluation of an implementation strategy. Public Transp 2, 291–306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-010-0030-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-010-0030-9