Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementatie van EBP: Professionals in een context

  • TOEPASSING IN DEPRAKTIJK
  • Published:
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice

De implementatie van zowel evidence-based behandelingen als het evidence-based gedachtegoed verloopt vaak moeizaam. Om het primaire proces te veranderen wordt veel inspanning gericht op de professional. Dat lijkt niet voldoende te zijn. Is die professional zo onwillig? Nee, de professional handelt in een context die minstens zo belangrijk is in implementatieprocessen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  1. Pravikoff DS, Tanner AB, Pierce ST. Readiness of U.S. nurses for evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs 2005; 105:40–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozsoy SA, Ardahan M. Research on knowledge sources used in nursing practices. Nurse Educ Today 2008; 28:602–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson C, McCaughan D, Cullum N, Sheldon T, Raynor P. Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care nursing: why viewing decision-making as context is helpful. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52:432–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Plas M, van Engelshoven I, Mintjes-de Groot J. Doorbreek de rituelen. Utrecht: LEVV; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn Makic MB, VonRueden KT, Rauen CA, Chadwick J. Evidence-based practice habits: putting more sacred cows out to pasture. Crit Care Nurse 2011; 31:38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Splunteren P, van den Bosch A, Kok I, Nuijen J. Evaluatie van ggz-doorbraakprojecten. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 2011; 66:518–532.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carrion M, Woods P, Norman I. Barriers to research utilization among forensic mental health nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 6:613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kajermo KN, Boström AM, Thompson DS, Hutchinson AM, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L. The BARRIERS scale – the barriers to research utilization scale: a systematic review. Implementation Science 2010; 26:5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Knops AM, Legemate DA, Oude Rengerink K, Heineman MJ, et al. Implementation of evidence-based practice: outside the box, throughout the hospital. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2011; 69(2):87–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence tot best practice: effective implementation for change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003; 362:1225–1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implementation Science 2006; Feb 22.

  12. van Achterberg T, Schoonhoven L, Grol R. Nursing implementation science: how evidence- based nursing requires evidence-based implementation.

  13. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Walrath-Greene CM. Evidence-based practice implementation: the impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice. Implementation Science 2009; 31 Dec.

  14. VanDeusen LC, Engle RL, Holmes SK, Parker VA, Petzel RA, Nealon SM, et al. Strengthening organizations to implement evidence-based clinical practices. Health Care Manage Rev 2010; 35:235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ambrose D. Managing complex change. Pittsburgh: The Enterprise Group; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Hees S, van der Vlist P, Mulder N. Van weten naar meten: ROM in de ggz. Amsterdam: Boom; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ProPersona Centre for Education and Science, Arnhem, The Netherlands

    Bea Tiemens

  2. Centrum voor Zorgmonitoring, Wolfheze, The Netherlands

    Bea Tiemens

  3. Indigo Service Organisatie, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Bea Tiemens

  4. Fontys Hogeschool Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Guus Munten

  5. Kwaliteit en Proces Innovatie, AMC Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hester Vermeulen

  6. Amsterdam School of Health Professions, Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hester Vermeulen

Authors
  1. Bea Tiemens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guus Munten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hester Vermeulen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

senior wetenschappelijk medewerker, directeur, hoofd Onderzoek

docent en onderzoeker

stafadviseur en senior onderzoeker, lid lectoraatebn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiemens, B., Munten, G. & Vermeulen, H. Implementatie van EBP: Professionals in een context. NED. TIJDS. EVID. PRACT. 10, 4–7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12468-012-0002-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12468-012-0002-y

Search

Navigation