Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carotid Atherosclerosis and the Risk of Stroke

  • Molecular Imaging (ZA Fayad, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stroke attributable to carotid atherosclerosis is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. The clinical management of carotid atherosclerosis presently relies on the degree of stenosis determined by angiography. Degree of stenosis is limited in stratifying patients’ risk of stroke. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging have resulted in the ability to directly assess atherosclerotic plaque components, morphology, and biomechanical stress levels. Components of atherosclerosis, including lipid-rich necrotic core, fibrous cap thickness/disruption, and intraplaque hemorrhage, are promising emerging indicators of stroke. Information beyond luminal stenosis from magnetic resonance imaging may allow for improved detection of patients at risk of stroke from carotid atherosclerosis. We review the recent literature on the relationship of magnetic resonance imaging detected plaque components and cerebrovascular events. Clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid plaque components are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2–e220.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gorelick PB. Carotid endarterectomy: where do we draw the line? Stroke. 1999;30:1745–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuo F, Gardener H, Dong C, Cabral D, Della-Morte D, Blanton SH, et al. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors explain the minority of the variability in carotid plaque. Stroke. 2012;43(7):1755–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, Cai YQ, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;240:464–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cappendijk VC, Kessels AG, Heeneman S, Cleutjens KB, Schurink GW, Welten RJ, et al. Comparison of lipid-rich necrotic core size in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:1356–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung HM, Moody AR, Singh N, Bitar R, Zhan J, Leung G. Late stage complicated atheroma in low-grade stenotic carotid disease: MR imaging depiction–prevalence and risk factors. Radiology. 2011;260(3):841–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moody AR, Bitar R, Leung G, Maggisano R. Looking beyond the lumen does make all the difference. Stroke. 2006;37(7):1648; author reply 1649.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moody A. Stroke: cause and effect–seek and ye shall find. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):406–8.

  11. Funaki T, Iihara K, Miyamoto S, Nagatsuka K, Hishikawa T, Ishibashi-Ueda H. Histologic characterization of mobile and nonmobile carotid plaques detected with ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(4):977–83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura T, Tsutsumi Y, Shimizu Y, Uchiyama S. Ulcerated carotid plaques with ultrasonic echolucency are causatively associated with thromboembolic cerebrovascular events. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.06.015.

  13. Topakian R, King A, Kwon SU, Schaafsma A, Shipley M, Markus HS. Ultrasonic plaque echolucency and emboli signals predict stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Neurology. 2011;77(8):751–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aldemir E, Apaydin M, Varer M, Uluc E. Echolucency of carotid plaques and cerebrovascular events. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:399–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Homburg PJ, Rozie S, van Gils MJ, van den Bouwhuijsen QJ, Niessen WJ, Dippel DW, et al. Association between carotid artery plaque ulceration and plaque composition evaluated with multidetector CT angiography. Stroke. 2011;42(2):367–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. U-King-Im JM, Fox AJ, Aviv RI, Howard P, Yeung R, Moody AR, et al. Characterization of carotid plaque hemorrhage: a CT angiography and MR intraplaque hemorrhage study. Stroke. 2010;41(8):1623–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:2051–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Delay GS, Allder S, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107(24):3047–52.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Saam T, Chu B, et al. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation. 2005;112:3437–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bitar R, Moody AR, Leung G, Symons S, Crisp S, Butany J, et al. In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology Rsna. 2008;2008:259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwee RM, van Engelshoven JM, Mess WH, ter Berg JW, Schreuder FH, Franke CL, et al. Reproducibility of fibrous cap status assessment of carotid artery plaques by contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2009;40:3017–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ota H, Yarnykh VL, Ferguson MS, Underhill HR, Demarco JK, Zhu DC, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences. Radiology. 2010;254:551–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh N, Moody AR, Gladstone DJ, Leung G, Ravikumar R, Zhan J, et al. Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men. Radiology. 2009;252(2):502–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Underhill H, Cai J, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI–initial results. Stroke. 2006;37:818–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PS, Auer D, MacSweeney ST, Moody AR, et al. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Davis JW, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002;105:181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Millon A, Boussel L, Brevet M, Mathevet JL, Canet-Soulas E, Mory C, et al. Clinical and histological significance of gadolinium enhancement in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke. 2012;43(11):3023–8. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.662692. Millon confirmed gadolinium enhancement of atherosclerotic plaque is associated with type VI plaque. Millon provides insight into location of gadolinium enhancement in the plaque, the possible mechanisms by which this enhancement occurs, and suggests that fibrous cap enhancement might be a precursor to plaque rupture.

  28. Kwee RM, Truijman MT, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, Prins MH, Franke CL, et al. Longitudinal MRI study on the natural history of carotid artery plaques in symptomatic patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42472.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun J, Underhill HR, Hippe DS, Xue Y, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS. Sustained acceleration in carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression with intraplaque hemorrhage: a long-term time course study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(8):798–804. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.014.

  30. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res. 2002;90:251–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. • McNally JS, Kim SE, Yoon HC, Findeiss LK, Roberts JA, Nightingale DR, et al. Carotid magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo signal is associated with acute territorial cerebral ischemic events detected by diffusion-weighted MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(3):376–82. Using an MP-RAGE sequence that is more sensitive to intraplaque hemorrhage compared with the traditional T1 weighted and time-of-flight sequences, McNally and colleagues demonstrated the association of intraplaque hemorrhage and stroke defined by diffusion tensor imaging.

  32. Kwee RM, Hofman PA, Gronenschild EH, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, ter Berg JW, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and cerebral white matter lesions: one-year follow-up study by MRI. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Qiao Y, Etesami M, Astor BC, Zeiler SR, Trout HH III, Wasserman BA. Carotid plaque neovascularization and hemorrhage detected by MR imaging are associated with recent cerebrovascular ischemic events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):755–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M, Enomoto Y, Asano T, Hara A, et al. Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215(2):399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  35. • Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Asano T, Kanematsu M, Takamatsu M, et al. High-intensity signal on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography indicates carotid plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during stenting. Stroke. 2011;42(11):3132–7. Yoshimura and colleagues demonstrated the ability of high-risk plaque defined by TOF high signal in the carotid plaque to be associated with embolism during carotid artery stenting. The use of a routinely used carotid imaging sequence such as TOF may be valuable in determining whether patient-centered therapy such as carotid artery stenting would benefit the patient.

  36. Kurosaki Y, Yoshida K, Endo H, Chin M, Yamagata S. Association between carotid atherosclerosis plaque with high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and subsequent ipsilateral ischemic events. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:62–7. discussion 67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. • Lindsay AC, Biasiolli L, Lee JM, Kylintireas I, MacIntosh BJ, Watt H, et al. Plaque features associated with increased cerebral infarction after minor stroke and TIA: a prospective, case–control, 3-T carotid artery MR imaging study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):388–96. Lindsay et al. reported that patients with minor stroke or TIA have a higher proportion of complex plaque, particularly in the group with stenosis less than 70 %, compared with asymptomatic controls. Fibrous cap rupture was associated with greater FLAIR and diffusion-weighted imaging brain lesions.

  38. • Freilinger TM, Schindler A, Schmidt C, Grimm J, Cyran C, Schwarz F, et al. Prevalence of nonstenosing, complicated atherosclerotic plaques in cryptogenic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):397–405. In up to 40 % of ischemic stroke patients, no definite etiology can be established despite extensive work-up. Freilinger et al. demonstrate that arterio-arterial embolism from complicated non-stenosing carotid atherosclerotic plaque may be the responsible etiology.

  39. Yoshida K, Sadamasa N, Narumi O, Chin M, Yamagata S, Miyamoto S. Symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis with intraplaque hemorrhage and expansive arterial remodeling is associated with a high relapse rate refractory to medical treatment. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(5):1143–50. discussion 1150–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Du J, Wasserman BA, Tong W, Chen S, Lai S, Malhotra S, et al. Cholesterol is associated with the presence of a lipid core in carotid plaque of asymptomatic, young-to-middle-aged African Americans with and without HIV infection and cocaine use residing in inner-city Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Cerebrovasc Dis (Switzerland: Basel). 2012;33(3):295–301. doi:10.1159/000334661.

  41. Zhao X, Underhill HR, Zhao Q, Cai J, Li F, Oikawa M, et al. Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: a comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Stroke. 2011;42(2):347–53.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kwee RM. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and cerebral white matter lesions. In: Cardiovascular Image Processing, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 19th Annual Meeting. 2011. Available at http://toc.proceedings.com/13329webtoc.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2012.

  43. Gao H, Long Q, Kumar Das S, Halls J, Graves M, Gillard JH, et al. Study of carotid arterial plaque stress for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Biomech. 2011;44(14):2551–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Walsh SR, Li ZY, Graves MJ, et al. Association between biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic carotid plaques and subsequent ischaemic cerebrovascular events–a longitudinal in vivo magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:485–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Graves MJ, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based biomechanical stress analysis of carotid atheroma: a comparison of single transient ischaemic attack, recurrent transient ischaemic attacks, non-disabling stroke and asymptomatic patient groups. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Freilinger T, Dimitriadis K, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Dichgans M, Saam T. Stroke while squeezing a pimple: traumatic rupture of a vulnerable carotid artery plaque. Neurology. 2011;76(3):305–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rubin MF, Rosas SE, Chirinos JA, Townsend RR. Surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease in CKD: what’s under the hood? Am J Kidney Dis. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2011;57(3):488–97.

  48. Ueda K, Watanabe Y, Katsumata T, Kaneko T, Otori T, Utsumi K, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and cerebral white matter lesions are more advanced in acute ischemic stroke patients with renal dysfunction. Clin Nephrol. 2011;76(4):290–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chou CC, Lien LM, Chen WH, Wu MS, Lin SM, Chiu HC, et al. Adults with late stage 3 chronic kidney disease are at high risk for prevalent silent brain infarction: a population-based study. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2120–5.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Teng Z, Degnan AJ, Sadat U, Wang F, Young VE, Graves MJ, et al. Characterization of healing following atherosclerotic carotid plaque rupture in acutely symptomatic patients: an exploratory study using in vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:64.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Falk E, Sillesen H, Muntendam P, Fuster V. The high-risk plaque initiative: primary prevention of atherothrombotic events in the asymptomatic population. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011;13:359–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yarnykh VL, Terashima M, Hayes CE, Shimakawa A, Takaya N, Nguyen PK, et al. Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koktzoglou I, Li D. Submillimeter isotropic resolution carotid wall MRI with swallowing compensation: imaging results and semiautomated wall morphometry. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:815–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NS/ARM are supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), Radiology Society of North America (RSNA) R&E Foundation, Physicians’ Services Incorporated Foundation, and the Cardiovascular Collaborative Sciences Program, University of Toronto.

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan R. Moody.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, N., Zavodni, A.E. & Moody, A.R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carotid Atherosclerosis and the Risk of Stroke. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 6, 25–33 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-012-9178-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-012-9178-9

Keywords

Navigation