Abstract
Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO fishing areas 27 and 31). The potential risk to human health through fish consumption was assessed using the maximum limit for mercury intake of 1.3 μg methylmercury Kg body weight−1 week−1. The results show that carnivorous species presented higher mercury content (range 0.03–0.88 μg g−1) when compared to omnivorous (range 0.003–0.19 μg g−1) in all sampling sites. Furthermore, demersal fish exhibited higher mercury levels (range 0.01–0.88 μg g−1) than the pelagic species (range 0.003–0.38 μg g−1) did. From the 38 species analysed only Zeus faber presented mercury levels (0.68 ± 0.07 μg g−1) above the maximum limit (0.5 μg g−1) established for human consumption. On the other hand, mercury intake can be higher than the recommended due to the consumption of 13 species from fishing area 27 (Azores archipelago and Northwest Portuguese coast) and one species (Cynoscion nebulosus) from fishing area 31 (Southeast Mexican coast). However, only the consumption of Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo from the fishing area 27 is discouraged. Thus, the fish consumption per capita in a specific area can exceed the limits of mercury ingestion, even when the mercury content in the fish is below the recommended for consumption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Adams DH, Sonne C, Basu N, Dietz R, Nam DH, Leifsson PS, Jensen AL (2010) Mercury contamination in spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus: an assessment of liver, kidney, blood, and nervous system health. Sci Total Environ 408:5808–5816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.019
Afonso C, Lourenço HM, Pereira C, Martins MF, Carvalho ML, Castro M, Nunes ML (2008) Total and organic mercury, selenium and α-tocopherol in some deep-water fish species. J Sci Food Agric 88:2543–2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3379
Andersen JL, Depledge MH (1997) A survey of total mercury and methylmercury in edible fish and invertebrates from Azorean waters. Mar Environ Res 44:331–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(97)00011-1
Azevedo LS, Pestana IA, da Costa Nery AF, Bastos WR, Souza CMM (2019) Variation in Hg accumulation between demersal and pelagic fish from Puruzinho lake, Brazilian Amazon. Ecotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02118-x
Backstrom CH, Buckman K, Molden E, Chen CY (2020) Mercury levels in freshwater fish: estimating concentration with fish length to determine exposures through fish consumption. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 78:604–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00717-y
Bebianno MJ, Santos C, Canário J, Gouveia N, Sena-Carvalho D, Vale C (2007) Hg and metallothionein-like proteins in the black scabbardfish Aphanopus carbo. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.02.003
Buck DG, Evers DC, Adams E, DiGangi J, Beeler B, Samánek J, Petrlik J, Turnquist MA, Speranskaya O, Regan K, Jonhson S (2019) A global-scale assessment of fish mercury concentrations and the identification of biological hotspots. Sci Total Environ 687:956–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.159
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2009) Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption: individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits. Environ Res 109:343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.002
Castro P, Huber M (2008) Marine biology, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York
Chakraborty P (2017) Mercury exposure and Alzheimer’s disease in India - an imminent threat? Sci Total Environ 589:232–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.168
Choy CA, Popp BN, Kaneko JJ, Drazen JC (2009) The influence of depth on mercury levels in pelagic fishes and their prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:13865–13869
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2018) Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme codex committee on contaminants in foods 12th session working document for information and use in discussions related to contaminants and toxins in the GSCTFF, CF/12 INF/1 Utrecht, The Netherlands, 12 - 16 March 2018, FAO/WHO
Conaway CH, Black FJ, Gault-Ringold M, Pennington JT, Chavez FP, Flegal AR (2009) Dimethylmercury in coastal upwelling waters, monterey bay, California. Environ Sci Technol 43:1305–1309. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802705t
Costley CT, Mossop KF, Dean JR, Garden LM, Marshall J, Carroll J (2000) Determination of mercury in environmental and biological samples using pyrolysis atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation. Anal Chim Acta 405:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00742-4
Custódio FB, Andrade AMGF, Guidi LR, Leal CAG, Gloria MBA (2020) Total mercury in commercial fishes and estimation of Brazilian dietary exposure to methylmercury. J Trace Elem Med Biol 62:126641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126641
Di Lena G, Casini I, Caproni R, Fusari A, Orban E (2017) Total mercury levels in commercial fish species from Italian fishery and aquaculture. Food Addit Contam Part B 10:118–127
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2015) Dietary guidelines for Americans 2015–2020. Government Printing Office, Washington
EFSA Scientific Committee (2015) Statement on the benefits of fish/seafood consumption compared to the risks of methylmercury in fish/seafood. EFSA J 13:3982
Ethier ALM, Scheuhammer AM, Bond DE (2008) Correlates of mercury in fish from lakes near Clyde Forks, Ontario, Canada. Environ Pollut 154:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.01.009
EU (2008) Commission Regulation (EC) No 629/2008. OJ L 173, 2 July 2008, p. 6–9
FAO (2020) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229e
Ferreira da Silva S, de Oliveira LM (2020) Mercury in fish marketed in the Amazon triple frontier and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 248:125989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125989
Froese R, Pauly D, Editors (2019) FishBase. World wide web electronic publication version. www.fishbase.org. Accessed 12 2019
Innes JK, Calder PC (2018) The differential effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 19:532
Jackson AC (2018) Chronic neurological disease due to methylmercury poisoning Canadian. Can J Neurol Sci 45:620–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2018.323
Junqué E, Garí M, Llull RM, Grimalt JO (2018) Drivers of the accumulation of mercury and organochlorine pollutants in Mediterranean lean fish and dietary significance. Sci Total Environ 634:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.335
Kershaw JL, Hall AJ (2019) Mercury in cetaceans: exposure, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Sci Total Environ 694:133683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133683
Koletzko B, Uauy R, Palou A, Kok F, Hornstra G, Eilander A, Moretti D, Osendarp S, Zock P, Innis S (2010) Dietary intake of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in children – a workshop report British. J Nutr 103:923–928. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509991851
Lee BJ, Kwon SY, Yin R, Li M, Jung S, Lim SH, Lee JH, Kim KW, Kim KD, Jang JW (2020a) Internal dynamics of inorganic and methylmercury in a marine fish: insights from mercury stable isotopes. Environ Pollut 267:115588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115588
Lee JY, Hwang GW, Naganuma A, Satoh M (2020b) Methylmercury toxic mechanism related to protein degradation and chemokine transcription. Environ Health Prev Med 25:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00868-3
Marrugo-Negrete J, Vargas-Licona S, Ruiz-Guzmán JA, Marrugo-Madrid S, Bravo AG, Díez S (2020) Human health risk of methylmercury from fish consumption at the largest floodplain in Colombia. Environ Res 182:109050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.109050
Mason RP, Jacob RF, Shrivastava S, Sherratt SCR, Chattopadhyay A (2016) Eicosapentaenoic acid reduces membrane fluidity, inhibits cholesterol domain formation, and normalizes bilayer width in atherosclerotic-like model membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Biomembranes 1858:3131–3140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.10.002
Milatou N, Dassenakis M, Megalofonou P (2020) Mercury concentrations in reared Atlantic bluefin tuna and risk assessment for the consumers: to eat or not to eat? Food Chem 331:127267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127267
Monteiro L, Isidro E, Lopes H (1991) Mercury content in relation to sex, size, age and growth in two scorpionfish (Helicolenus dactylopterus and Pontinus kuhlii) from Azorean waters. Water Air Soil Pollut 56:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00342283
Moriarity RJ, Liberda EN, Tsuji LJS (2020) Subsistence fishing in the Eeyou Istchee (James Bay, Quebec, Canada): a regional investigation of fish consumption as a route of exposure to methylmercury. Chemosphere 258:127413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127413
Pinho MR, Menezes G (2009) Demersal fishery off the Azores. Boletim do Núcleo Cultural da Horta 18:85–102
Polak-Juszczak L (2018) Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury in the tissues and organs of fish from the southern Baltic Sea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:34181–34189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3336-9
Pugach S, Clarkson T (2009) Prenatal mercury exposure and postnatal outcome: clinical case report and analysis. Clin Toxicol 47:366–370
Sarkar T, Alam MM, Parvin N, Fardous Z, Chowdhury AZ, Hossain S, Haque ME, Biswas N (2016) Assessment of heavy metals contamination and human health risk in shrimp collected from different farms and rivers at Khulna-Satkhira region, Bangladesh. Toxicol Rep 3:346–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.03.003
Silva CAd, Tessier E, Kütter VT, Wasserman JC, Donard OF, Silva-Filho EV (2011) Mercury speciation in fish of the Cabo Frio upwelling region, SE-Brazil Brazilian. J Oceanogr 59:259–266
Sousa MC, Ribeiro A, Des M, Gomez-Gesteira M, deCastro M, Dias JM (2020) NW Iberian peninsula coastal upwelling future weakening: competition between wind intensification and surface heating. Sci Total Environ 703:134808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134808
Stergiou KI, Karpouzi VS (2002) Feeding habits and trophic levels of mediterranean fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish 11:217–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020556722822
Sulimanec Grgec A, Kljaković-Gašpić Z, Orct T, Tičina V, Sekovanić A, Jurasović J, Piasek M (2020) Mercury and selenium in fish from the eastern part of the Adriatic Sea: a risk-benefit assessment in vulnerable population groups. Chemosphere 261:127742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127742
Teh LCL, Sumaila UR (2013) Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish Fish 14:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00450.x
Unoki T, Akiyama M, Kumagai Y, Gonçalves FM, Farina M, da Rocha JBT, Aschner M (2018) Molecular pathways associated with methylmercury-induced Nrf2 modulation. Front Genet. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00373
Válega M, Abreu S, Pato P, Rocha L, Gomes AR, Pereira ME, Duarte AC (2006) Determination of organic mercury in biota, plants and contaminated sediments using a thermal atomic absorption spectrometry technique. Water Air Soil Pollut 174:223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9100-7
Vieira HC, Bordalo MD, Morgado F, Soares AMVM, Abreu SN (2017) Mercury content in the white and dark muscle of Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) along the canning process: implications to the consumers. J Food Compos Anal 56:67–72
Vieira HC, Morgado F, Soares AMVM, Abreu SN (2015) Fish consumption recommendations to conform to current advice in regard to mercury intake. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9595–9602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4635-z
Vieira HC, Rendón-von Osten J, Soares AMVM, Morgado F, Abreu SN (2020a) Contribution of commercial fish species to human mercury exposure: an evaluation near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. J Food Compos Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103688
Vieira HC, Rendón-von Osten J, Soares AMVM, Morgado F, Abreu SN (2020b) Mercury bioaccumulation in the long-fin squid Loligo forbesi near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: implications to human exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 203:110957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110957
Wang Y, Xie Q, Xu Q, Xue J, Zhang C, Wang D (2019) Mercury bioaccumulation in fish in an artificial lake used to carry out cage culture. J Environ Sci 78:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.11.016
WHO (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation, 28 January–1 February 2002. World Heath Organization/Food and Agricultural Organization, Geneva
WHO (2008) Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
Xu X, Wang W-X (2017) Mercury exposure and source tracking in distinct marine-caged fish farm in southern China. Environ Pollut 220:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.021
Zhang H, Guo C, Feng H, Shen Y, Wang Y, Zeng T, Song S (2020) Total mercury, methylmercury, and selenium in aquatic products from coastal cities of China: distribution characteristics and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 739:140034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140034
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due for the financial support to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020), to FCT/MEC through national funds. The authors also thank FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) for the PhD Grant of Vieira, H. C. (PD/BD/127808/2016). Bordalo, M.D. is funded by national funds (OE), through FCT, I.P., in the scope of the framework contract foreseen in the numbers 4, 5 and 6 of the article 23, of the Decree-Law 57/2016, of August 29, changed by Law 57/2017, of July 19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HCV: Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Formal analysis, Writing—Original Draft. MMBR: Investigation; Writing—Review and Editing. MDB: Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Writing—Review and Editing. ACMR: Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Writing—Review and Editing. AMVMS: Resources; Funding acquisition; Writing—Review and Editing. SNA: Supervision; Methodology; Writing—Review and Editing. FM: Supervision; Resources; Writing—Review and Editing. JRO: Supervision; Methodology; Writing—Review and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests (financial or non-financial).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vieira, H.C., Ramirez, M.M.B., Bordalo, M.D. et al. Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment. Expo Health 13, 361–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7