Skip to main content
Log in

Distancing, Yet One

  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the debate about whether distancing has occurred between American Jewry and Israel one of the two sides is more convincing than the other, but both sides focus on samples of the more identified Jewish population thus ignoring the more marginal that are quite crucial in adjudicating this debate. Age specific cross-sectional data from the more broadly representative NJPS unequivocally show a blurring among the younger of the strong sense of interest, affective involvement, responsibility and caring that American Jewry historically displayed toward Israel and its needs. However, the demonstrable existence of similar patterns of Jewish identification in the U.S. and in Israel provides powerful evidence to persisting coherence in contemporary symbolic and institutional perceptions over the opposite thesis of a Jewish identification stemming from the variable circumstances of local contexts. Jews in the U.S. and in Israel may be distancing from each other, but they still are part of one Jewish peoplehood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For some of the following materials I am indebted to my colleagues Shlomit Levy, Uzi Rebhun and Dalia Sagi.

References

  • Cohen, S.M., and A.Y. Kelman. 2010. Thinking about distancing from Israel. Contemporary Jewry. doi:10.1007/s12397-010-9053-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaPergola, S. 2005. Was it the demography? A reassessment of U.S. Jewish population estimates, 1945–2001. Contemporary Jewry 25: 85–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaPergola, S. 2008. World Jewish population 2008. In American Jewish year book, vol. 108, ed. D. Singer, and L. Grossman, 569–620. New York: American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaPergola, S., S. Levy, U. Rebhun, and D. Sagi. 2009. Patterns of Jewish identification in the United States, 2001. In Theory construction and multivariate analysis: Applications of facet approach, ed. D. Elizur, and E. Yaniv, 305–318. Tel Aviv: FTA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. 1968. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33: 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C., B.T. Phillips, and L. Saxe. 2005. National Jewish population survey 2000–01: A guide to the perplexed. Contemporary Jewry 25: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, B.A., and A. Keysar. 2009. American religious identification survey (ARIS 2008). Hartford: Program on Public Values, Trinity College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler-Berkowitz, L., S.M. Cohen, J. Ament, V. Klaff, F. Mott, and D. Peckermen-Neuman. 2003. The National Jewish Population Survey 2000–01: Strength, challenge and diversity in the American Jewish community. New York: United Jewish Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. 2008. Smallest space analysis of Jewish identification indicators in Israel 2000. Unpublished paper, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

  • Levy, S., H. Levinsohn, and E. Katz. 2002. A portrait of Israeli Jewry: Beliefs, observances, and values among Israeli Jews 2000. Jerusalem: The Guttman Center of the Israel Democracy Institute for The Avi Chai Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, E., B. Kosmin, and A. Keysar. 2002. American Jewish Identity Survey: An exploration in the demography and outlook of a people. New York: The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, U. 2001. Recent developments in Jewish identification in the United States: A cohort follow-up and facet analysis. In Papers in Jewish Demography 1997, ed. S. DellaPergola, and J. Even, 261–279. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebhun, U., and S. Levy. 2005. Unity and diversity: Jewish identification in America and in Israel 1990–2000. Sociology of Religion 67(4): 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasson, T., C. Kadushin and L. Saxe. 2010. Trends in American Jewish attachment to Israel: An assessment of the “distancing” hypothesis. Contemporary Jewry. doi:10.1007/s12397-010-9056-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thighe, E., C. Kadushin, and L. Saxe. 2009. Jewish population in the US 1990 vs 2000. Waltham: Steinhardt Social Research Institute, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio DellaPergola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DellaPergola, S. Distancing, Yet One. Cont Jewry 30, 183–190 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-010-9038-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-010-9038-3

Keywords

Navigation