Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Educational Potential Assessment of Geodiversity Sites: a Proposal and a Case Study in the Basque Country (Spain)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Informal education facilities help schools to engage in meaningful outdoor geology experiences, providing educational materials and a learning environment that meet rigorous scientific and educational standards. In some cases, these sites focus on the general public and do not share the same educative paradigm of schools. Likewise, due to the particular nature of Earth sciences, many geological processes can be difficult to explain with the usual interpretative resources. In this context, we consider whether the pedagogical potential of geological interpretation sites is being fully developed. This study proposes a methodology for assessing the educational value of geodiversity sites through the analysis of the educative resources and interpretative tools, including panels, guided tours and written guides. The method can be useful to evaluate facilities on an individual basis, but it also allows comparisons of different sites in a determined area or region. This methodology has been used in the assessment of interpretation centres in 11 areas of geological interest in the Basque Country (Spain). Results highlight some differences that emerge among the educative facilities and that should take into account by managers and educators, such as the lack of importance given to geology in contrast with other sciences in most exhibitions, or the absence of free-access educational materials useful for teachers in the preparation of their visits, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afonso AS, Gilbert JK (2007) Educational value of different types of exhibits in an interactive science and technology center. Sci Educ 91:967–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen S (2002) Looking for learning in visitor talk: a methodological exploration. In: Leinhardt G, Crowley K, Knutson K (eds) Learning conversations in museums Mahwah. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 259–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen S, Gutwill J (2004) Designing with multiple interactives: five common pitfalls. Curator 47:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almquist H, Stanley G, Blank L, Hendrix M, Rosenblatt M, Hanflingand S, Crews J (2011) An integrated field-based approach to building teachers’ geoscience skills. J Geosci Educ 59:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D, Kisiel J, Storksdieck M (2006) Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: discovering common ground in three countries. Curator 49(3):365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apedoe XS (2008) Engaging students in inquiry: tales from an undergraduate geology laboratory-based course. Sci Educ 92:631–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balliet RN, Riggs EM, Maltese AV (2015) Students’ problem solving approaches for developing geologic models in the field. J Res Sci Teach 52(8):1109–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basque Government (2011). Geoturismo sostenible en la red de espacios naturales protegidos de la Comunidad Autónoma Vasca. http://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2ingdib/es/contenidos/documentacion/geoturismo/es_doc/index.shtml. Accessed 1November 2019

  • Batzri O, Assaraf OZ, Cohen C, Orion N (2015) Understanding the earth systems: expressions of dynamic and cyclic thinking among university students. Sci Educ Technol 24:761–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayas J, Blanco R, Gutierrez J (2000) Evaluación de la calidad de las visitas guiadas a espacios naturales protegidos. Tópicos en Educación Ambiental 2(5):69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollati I, Pelfini M, Pellegrini L (2012) A geomorphosites selection method for educational purposes: a case study in Trebbia Valley (Emilia Romagna, Italy). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 35:23–35. https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2012.35.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusi D, Zamorano M, Casellas RM, Bach J (2011) Reflexiones sobre el diseño por competencias en el trabajo de campo en Geología. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra 19(1):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Overeem I, Berlin M (2013) Taking it to the streets: the case for modeling in the geosciences undergraduate curriculum. Comput Geosci 53:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, Durán JJ, García-Cortés Á, López-Martínez J (2009) Geological heritage and geoconservation in Spain: past, present, and future. Geoheritage 1:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, Berrio MP, Belmonte A, Durán JJ, López-Martínez J (2010) Geological diffusion among the general public: principles, techniques and methods for the design of written information. Bol R Soc Esp Hist Nat Sec Geol 104:93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo J (2012) Interpretative panels about the geological heritage—a case study at the Iguassu falls National Park (Brazil). Geoheritage 4:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreras J, Druguet E (1998) The geological heritage of the cap de Creus peninsula (NE Spain): some keys for its conservation. Geol Balc 28(3–4):43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayla N (2014) An overview of new technologies applied to the management of geoheritage. Geoheritage 6:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2014) Lessons from US fossil parks for effective informal science education. Geoheritage 6:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodick J, Orion N (2003) Measuring student understanding of geological time. Sci Educ 87(5):708–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escorihuela J (2017) The role of the geotouristic guide in earth science education: towards a more critical society of land management. Geoheritage 10(2):301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou-Nikolakis P, Iliopoulos G (2012) Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage 4:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feher E (1990) Interactive museum exhibits as tools for learning: explorations with light. Int J Sci Educ 12:35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fermeli G, Meléndez G, Koutsouveli A, Dermitzakis M, Calonge A, Steininger F, D’Arpa C, Di Patti C (2015) Geoscience teaching and student interest in secondary schools-preliminary results from an interest research in Greece, Spain and Italy. Geoheritage 7:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippini-Fantoni S, Bowen JP (2008) Mobile multimedia: reflections from ten years of practice. In: Tallon L, Walker K (eds) Digital technologies and the museum experience: handheld guides and other media. Alta Mira Press, Lanham, pp 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Francek M (2012) A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. Int J Sci Educ 35(1):31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajek G, Zgłobicki W, Kołodyńska-Gawrysiak R (2019) Geoeducational value of quarries located within the ,Małopolska Vistula River Gap (E Poland). Geoheritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00395-w

  • Geyer C, Neubauer K, Lewalter D (2013) Public understanding of science via research areas in science museums: the evaluation of the EU project NanoToTouch. In: Locke L, Locke S (eds) Knowledge in publics: beyond deficit, engagement and transfer. Cambridge Scholars, London, pp 50–74

    Google Scholar 

  • González N (2008) Una investigación cualitativa y etnográfica sobre el valor educativo y el uso didáctico del patrimonio cultural. Enseñanza Ciencias Soc 7:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandgirard V (1995) Méthode pour la réalisation d’un inventaire de géotopes géomorphologiques. UKPIK Cahiers de l’Institut de Géographie de l’Université de Fribourg 10:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadachilleos S, Valanides N, Leou M (2004) Construction of knowledge in non-formal settings. Sci Educ Int 15(2):125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose T (1995) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ Interpr 10(2):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Leigh J, Morin P, van Keken P (2006) GeoWall: stereoscopic visualization for geoscience research and education. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26(6):10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Chan L (2009) The consumption of museum service experiences: benefits and value of museum experiences. J Hosp Mark Manag 18:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel J, Ancelet J (2009) Uncovering visitor conceptions of fossils and the fossil record. Visitor Stud 12(2):133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tourism 2(2):80–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická́ vrchovina Highland (eastern part of theCzech Republic). Geoheritage 8(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansigu C, Bosse-Lansigu V, Le Hebel F (2014) Tools and methods used to represent geological processes and geosites: graphic and animated media as a means to popularize the scientific content and value of geoheritage. Geoheritage 6:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EB, Baker DR (2010) A call for a new geoscience education research agenda. Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. Paper 122

  • Magagna A, Ferrero E, Giardino M, Lozar F, Perotti F (2013) A selection of geological tours for promoting the italian geological heritage in the secondary schools. Geoheritage 5:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín C. (2011) Estudio analítico descriptivo de los centros de interpretación en España, Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Barcelona

  • Martín I, Martín F (2014) Diagnóstico y evaluación de centros de visitantes del Parque Nacional de las Cumbres de Guadarrama: propuestas de actuación. PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 12(1):107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales J (2001) Guía práctica de la interpretación del patrimonio. Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Cultura

  • Mortensen MF, Smart K (2007) Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. J Res Sci Teach 44(9):1389–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz M (2008) Evaluación y financiación del uso público en espacios naturales protegidos. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

  • National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamupangedengu E, Lelliott A (2012) An exploration of learners’ use of worksheets during a science museum visit. Afr J Res Math Sci Technol Educ 16(1):82–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion N, Hofstein A (1994) Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. J Res Sci Teach 31:1097–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull (suppl Bd) 46:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Alves MIC (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho natural park. Geogr Helv 62(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piqueras J, Achiam M (2019) Science museum educators’ professional growth: dynamics of changes in research–practitioner collaboration. Sci Educ:1–29

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie 11(3):189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing ‘scientific’ and ‘additional’ values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer C (2003) Technological novelty and open-endedness: two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. J Res Sci Teach 40(2):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwan S, Grajal A, Lewalter D (2014) Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educ Psychol 49(2):70–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa national park (Spain). Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 11(3):197–208. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran LU, King H (2011) Teaching science in informal environments: pedagogical knowledge for informal educators. In: Corrigan D, Dillon J, Gunstone R (eds) The professional knowledge base of science teaching. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Trend R (2009) Commentary: fostering students’ argumentation skills in geoscience education. J Geosci Educ 57(4):224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zecha S, Regelous A (2018) Promoting geodiversity education by using earthcaching in National Geoparks. Geoheritage 10:637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island – coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Nerea Casas for her help.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basque Government under Grant PT10267.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Science Didactics, Faculty of Education, Philosophy and Anthropology of Donostia-San Sebastián, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain

    Josu Sanz

  2. Department of Mathematics and Science Didactics, Faculty of Education of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain

    Teresa Zamalloa, Gurutze Maguregi, Lola Fernandez & Isabel Echevarria

Authors
  1. Josu Sanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teresa Zamalloa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gurutze Maguregi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lola Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isabel Echevarria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josu Sanz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanz, J., Zamalloa, T., Maguregi, G. et al. Educational Potential Assessment of Geodiversity Sites: a Proposal and a Case Study in the Basque Country (Spain). Geoheritage 12, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00432-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00432-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation