Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Potential for Speleotourism Development in Eastern Serbia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The region of Eastern Serbia is a highly dominant karst terrain with numerous geological and geomorphological features, especially caves. The speleotourism potential of these caves and other geosites still remains fully unrevealed. In this paper, we analyzed several caves with immense geotourism potential. These caves include Ceremošnja Cave, Ravništarka Cave, Resavska Cave, Rajkova Cave, Lazareva Cave and Vernjikica Cave. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the speleotourism potential of Eastern Serbia and to determine the current state and speleotourism potential of caves located in this area by applying the modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM). The results indicate that further speleotourism development should primarily be focused towards Rajkova Cave which has the highest main values. The results also emphasize the importance of additional (tourist) values which are currently at a low level among all analyzed geosites. This especially refers to tour guide service, interpretive panels and promotional activities which proved to be key elements at these types of destinations. Major improvement of these elements is necessary in the future in order to attract a larger number of visitors to these sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aley T (2010) Management strategies for responding to white-nose syndrome in bats. Natl Speleol Soc News 68(2):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (2010) Caves and karst geotourism in Australia. In: Dowling R, Newsome D (eds) Global geotourism perspectives. Goodfellow Publishers Ltd, Oxford, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Antić A, Tomić N (2017) Geoheritage and geotourism potential of the Homolje area (eastern Serbia). Acta Geoturistica 8(2):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boškov J, Kotrla S, Jovanović M, Tomić N, Lukić T, Rvović I (2015) Application of the preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM): the case of the Bela Crkva municipality (Vojvodina, North Serbia). Geographica Pannonica 19(3):146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Božić S, Tomić N (2015) Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: comparative analysis from two perspectives—general tourists’ and pure geotourists. Open Geosci 7:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno DE, Crowley BE, Gutake JM, Moroni A, Nazarenko OV, Oheim KB, Ruban DA, Tiess G, Zorina OS (2014) Paleogeography as geological heritage: developing geosite classification. Earth Sci Rev 138:300–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation. Can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario 18:293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigna AA, Burri E (2000) Development, management and economy of show caves. Int J Speleol 29(1):01–1):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il. Quaternario 18:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas CR (2010) The role and importance of cave microclimate in the sustainable use and management of show caves. Acta Carsologica 39(3):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djurović P, Mijović D (2006) Geoheritage of Serbia—representative of its total geodiversity. Collection of papers - Faculty of Geography at the University of Belgrade 54:5–18

  • Erhartič B (2010) Geomorphosite assessment. Acta Geogr Slov 50(2):295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillieson DS (1996) Caves: processes, development and management. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillieson DS (2011) Management of caves. In: van Beynen PE (ed) Karst management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 141–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1997) Geotourism—selling the earth to Europe. In: Marinos PG, Koukis GC, Tsiambaos GC, Stournaras GC (eds) Engineering geology and the environment. A.A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 2955–2960

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.postojnska-jama.eu/sl/novice/2017/rekordno-poslovanje-obtozbe-zavrzene/. Accessed 7 April 2017

  • Lazarević R (1975) Rajkova Cave. Local community “Boža Stojanović”, Majdanpek

  • Lazarević R (1981) Cave adaptation for tourism in Serbia. Collection of papers of 8th Yugoslav speleological congress, Belgrade

  • Lazarević R (1988) Ceremošnja, 2nd edn. Working Organization for hospitality and tourism Partizan, Kučevo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarević R (1998) Karst of Dubašnica, Gornjan and Majdanpek. Serbian Geographical Society, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  • Lješević M (1981) Aesthetic factors in cave decorating for tourism. Collection of papers of 8th Yugoslav speleological congress, pp 167–171

  • Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK (2012) Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helv 62:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrović J (1971) Resavske Caves. Serbian Tourist Council, Belgrade

  • Petrović A (2006) Speleotourism in Serbia—conditions and development perspectives. Collection of papers - Faculty of Geography at the University of Belgrade 54:183–194

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing the tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie 11(3):189–196. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Din Quat 31:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie 11(3):197–208. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomić N (2011) The potential of Lazar Canyon (Serbia) as a geotourism destination: inventory and evaluation. Geographica Pannonica 15:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomić N, Božić S (2014) A modified geosite assessment model (MGAM) and its application on the Lazar Canyon area (Serbia). Int J Environ Res 8(4):1041–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomić N, Marković SB, Korać M, Mrđić N, Hose TA, Vasiljević DA, Jovičić M, Gavrilov MB (2015) Exposing mammoths: from loess research discovery to public palaeontological park. Quat Int 372:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vujičić MD, Vasiljević DA, Marković SB, Hose TA, Lukić T, Hadžić O, Janićević S (2011) Preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM) and its application on Fruška Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta Geographica Slovenica 51:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White S, Wakelin-King GA (2014) Earth sciences comparative matrix: a comparative method for geoheritage assessment. Geogr Res 52(2):168–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn M, Erhartič B, Komac B (2009) La Slovénie, berceau du géotourism karstique. Karstologia 54:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zouros NC (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. The case of the Lesvos island coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by project 176020 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

    Nemanja Tomić, Aleksandar Antić, Slobodan B. Marković & Tijana Đorđević

  2. Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Gosposka ulica 13, SI 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Matija Zorn & Mateja Breg Valjavec

Authors
  1. Nemanja Tomić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aleksandar Antić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Slobodan B. Marković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tijana Đorđević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matija Zorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mateja Breg Valjavec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nemanja Tomić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomić, N., Antić, A., Marković, S.B. et al. Exploring the Potential for Speleotourism Development in Eastern Serbia. Geoheritage 11, 359–369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0288-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0288-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation